Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
magnum mike

Boating Safety certificate

21 posts in this topic

While you are getting all your documentation ready for your next Canadian adventure, add the boater safety certification to your list. New for 2009 the Ministry of Transportation has made a new requirement for anyone who operates a boat of any size on any Canadian waters. The regulation is enforceable starting September 2009 and the fine is $250 + surcharges. If no one in the boat has a certificate, the boat may be impounded and add those costs to the total.

You can take the Canadian course which means a trip to one of the approved sites listed on the MOT HSOforum OR if you have a valid certificate provided by your home state government (MN DNR). The Minnesota cert is available online and costs $20.

There is no mention of this on the Ministry of Natural Resources site or the OPP site. It is on the MOT site in the boating section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasn't this been the case if you were in Canada for more than 45 straight days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is only required, for non-residents of Canada, if they operate the boat, in Canada, for more than 44 consecutive days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike,

JCR is right, its if you are up there for more than 45 days straight. If you leave the country for 1 day then the 45 days starts over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way it's worded you don't even have to leave the country, as long as you don't operate the boat 45 consecutive days. However it's probably best to be conservative, and interpret the rule as you say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading the entire regulation it appears that this does not apply to every one who operates a boat in Canada. If you leave your boat in Canada more than 44 days it would apply. I doesn't seem to matter if you operate it or not.

B) is not a resident of Canada and whose pleasure craft is in Canada for less than 45 consecutive days;

If you have a camp or cabin in Canada and leave boats at the site, this rule applies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I aggree, that appears to be the wording on the more detailed document. This goes into affect, in Sept 2009, for older adults, and will require some action from those of us that have a place in canada. I took the Minnesota DNR on line test today, and got my Minnesota Adult Boater Education Certificate. It is rather tedious and takes two or three hours, but is pretty easy. You can't skip ahead, or take just the tests, as they force you to read and test each section. It costs twenty bucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JCR nailed this one. The online version is probably the easiest way to go but it is tedious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI

The law says OPERATE BOAT, not store or keep or dock...

If you are a non-resident and don't operate your boat for more than 44 days in a row, this DOES NOT APPLY TO YOU.

Period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the complete document rather than the first FAQ comment. There is a link to it below the part you are probably reading. It says the rule applies to non-residents if you have your boat in canada for more than 45 consecutive days. The certficate requirement is in Subsection 1.

2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person who

(a) is operating the pleasure craft under the supervision of an instructor as part of an accredited course;

(B) is not a resident of Canada and whose pleasure craft is in Canada for less than 45 consecutive days;

There is no mention of operating the boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Magnum Mike,

I have always thought that one could not keep their boat at their Canadian cabin. I transport mine back and forth over the border every trip. Does anyone leave their United States registered boat in Canada at their cabin? If someone has figured out a way to leave it there please let me know. John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our camp is fly-in only and the boats are Canadian registered

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a form E-99 that you can get at the border at no cost that allows you to leave your boat and trailer for the season. I have a cabin that I leave my boat at from early May until October each year. You just need to turn the E-99 back in at the border when you take your boat back to the US at the end of the season.

gonorth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information. How would someone from the states register a boat in Canada? I have even considered purchasing some property in International Falls just to store toys. It gets to be a hassle to haul 4 four wheelers and a boat from Indiana. John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact a Canadian attorney. The process is exponentially harder than what you encounter at customs with your 4 wheelers. Unless you spend a great deal of time in Canada, keep doing what you are doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just talked to the Customs agent at RR last week about leaving a boat in Canada (I have a cabin near Morson), and his suggestion was to import the boat instead of getting the E-99 form. Just get an appraisal on the boat, and the import fee is 5% of the value. One time charge. They take care of the paperwork (filing) and you're good to go. The kicker is if you're importing a trailer for the boat, and it's newer than 15 years old, there is another $200 charge and the trailer has to be registered with Canadian RV dept. Something to do with licensing for the road. The agent's suggestion was to find an old trailer to keep at the cabin to haul the boat if necessary. Also, apparently the trailer has to be inspected every so often, and we all know the way the marinas charge up north.

He really didn't even want to talk about the E-99 form, seemed to think it wasn't a good idea, Something about storage problems. He didn't elaborate.

More food for thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. I had never thought about importing the boat, sounds like that will work. I will also ask the free opinion of a lawyer if there is such a thing. John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FREE LAWYER? Bartender, I'll have what John is having!

Seriously, there are likely more ways to skin this cat than I am aware of. We resolved most of these issues in the early 80’s. Good luck with your quest and good fishing to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, don't get swindled. The E-99 form works great. I've used it foer years.

If you have a $30,000 boat, why pay $1,500 just so you can leave it at your own cabin?! Especially if you bring it home occasionally or for winter. Also, you must thb licnese the boat and trailer in Ontario.

It's amazing how much odd information these "officials'' give out. The odd thing is no two of them will ever say the same thing.

Anyhow, the E-99 is free. And the only agency that enforces it is the canada border Services, not MNR or even OPP, fyi.. it pays to know some cops.

Good luck all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

Call Pinewood Sports in Ft. Francis. They offer boat storage.

Hiddenbay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Youtube is the way to go. So many cool little self filmed fishing shows on there. Heck I have a channel myself where I record my fishing trips. Uncut angling is cool, I also like Peelindrag because he is out of Michigan like me. Screw those commercial filled, cheesy scripted fishing shows on tv. Times have changed in my opinion.
    • Krylon and Rustoleum both have aerosol primers for plastic.  
    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
  • Our Sponsors