Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Froggy4371

Powder for Hunting

11 posts in this topic

Ok So I want some opinions here. I have been shooting Triple 7 powder for about 5 years. I was talking with some buddys of mine and they all shoot pyrodex powder. They are both made by Hodgon and they are telling me that they are for the most part the same except pyrodex is a little bit dirter buring. What do you guys know about.

Froggy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Triple 777 is a little bit cleaner shooting. Has a little bit more of a tendency to create a harder ridge of dirtiness right at the bottom where the bullet seats than some of the other powders maybe? Not really an issue unless you try to shoot a lot of shots without swabbing the barrel out with a wet or cleaning patch followed by some dry patches.

Here is the really cool thing about Triple 777 loose powder. It is 15% more powerful than the other brands by volume. Therefore you use less powder to get the same velocity. 100 grains of loose triple 777 is actually the equivalent of 115 grains of powder.

This can become dangerous though in that if you shoot 150 grains of loose triple 777 you are actually shooting outside the safe zone of a lot of muzzleloaders. It's actually like shooting 172.5 grains of powder.

If you buy the pellets you are shooting the actual amount it says because they have changed the amount of grains to be equivalent to what it says. The 15% more powerful only applies to the loose.

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

777 is much cleaner with no strong sulfur smell. Shoot the 777 primers which aren't as hot and the supposed ring (which I never even got with regular 209 primers by the way) won't be a problem.

I'd never go back to Pyrodex...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I figured that I would stick with the triple 7 but just wanted some other opinions.

Froggy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't shot anything but loose triple 777 so I could only speak from my experience from that. The guy that initially helped set me up with everything to start with had been muzzleloader hunting for years and walked me through everything I needed to get started. My first muzzleloader hunt was elk hunting in Colorado so I was in their in early August which probably helped me out.

He recommended the triple 777 and it was what he would normally shoot unless he was shooting real black powder. I don't see any reason that you would need to switch powders.

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I figured that I would stick with the triple 7 but just wanted some other opinions.

Froggy

have u ever considered Shockeys pioneer gold? i guess its supposed to be the real deal my uncle uses it and swears by it but i havent had to muzzy hunt in a couple yrs so i havent bought any yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have thought about Shockeys powder but it is just to nice to have it in pellet form. There is to much to screw up with loose powder in my simple mind I think. Maybe I dont think and that is my problem smile

Thanks Guys,

Froggy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get the Shockey powder in pre-measured loads. They come tapered for easy loading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I will try that after this year then. I have never seen the pre-measured loads.

Froggy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I run out of loose powder or feel that my loose powder is going bad I'm pretty sure I'll switch over to a pellet style powder. It's a lot easier to deal with, and probably more accurate for how many grains of powder you are shooting each shot. I think that the pellets are significantly more expensive though.

Make sure you check the regs though because some states don't allow pellets. Just like some states don't allow Sabots style bullets. Minnesota allows both but not a scope. Colorado doesn't allow pelletized powder, sabot style bullets, or scopes and that was the first state that I hunted with a muzzleloader.

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I agree that it would be good if he did what he said he would do. However he did not do what he said he was going to do.    
    • took up to 153 in smoker.  I like it cold and fried. Have only eaten it cold so far from this one.    Found  this on a brining site. If you don’t have or don’t want to use curing salt containing sodium nitrite, you can brine meats without it. Without curing salt that contains sodium nitrite, the color of the cured meat will be gray rather than pink and the flavor is less sweet with a more pronounced “pickle” flavor. It turns out more like seasoned roast meat, than a cured meat.   It's nice and pink just like the others I have done, maybe the pickling salt somewhat cured it. who knows      
    • Where did you hear that food plots were to be banned?   I have seen about banning "feeding deer"  which I took to mean the classic set up a feeder and dump corn and alfalfa in it.     Jumping on areas immediately has been shown to be successful in preventing isolated cases from spreading and becoming endemic.   Once it becomes established in the herd, it seems as if controlling it is no longer possible.   It also seems as if CWD is fairly hard to catch for a deer, or else it would be all over everywhere and all the deer in an area like Dane county would have it.    Oh, and the infected deer could have come from a deer farm, or from Iowa where it has been detected in the county bordering MN on the SE.    
    • I wouldn't call myself wealthy, but I've made good life choices that have enabled me to buy my own land.  Still pack my own lunch and watch for sales at the grocery store.  I don't own land in SE MN, I own land in northern MN.  The reason I am concerned is that this will serve as a template for herd control tactics in other parts of MN.  Understand that the game management agencies have conferences where they talk about managing hunters.  You don't have to look any further than the work of Dr. Gary Alt in Pennsylvania.    I can't put my finger on exactly what is going on with the results the DNR has presented.  Were the samples snuck in by a nefarious actor?  I wouldn't rule it out.  Was the disease always here and just finally discovered?  I don't see why not.  Is there a unique environmental reason that CWD hasn't gotten a broad foothold here?  It's possible.    If the agency had some credibility going into this, I'd be on board pounding kool aid myself, but they don't.  So color me skeptical.  None of the WI border counties along zone 3 have CWD according to this map.  However, Burnett and Polk do and there is no monitoring on our side up there.  Can a scientist explain that to me?  Because the geographic barriers up there are non-existent compared to  the Mississippi River along zone 3.       
    • I made the decision to replace the pump every few years rather than the carpet.
    • On my aluminum skid house I've been using thread cutting stainless steel screws from Fastenal
    • There might be a pleasant surprise in the works.   In the meantime, it is entertaining to watch anyway....      
    • Huh---Guess you must have the butthurt.
    • You are cooking it before you eat it right? I've only heard people using Cure when using dehydrators or may be for jerky when using burger. I have never used the stuff but don't like or make dehydrated jerky.   Seem to still be alive!
    • Creepworm, I am somewhat angry.  The reason it's fool hardy to consider food plots any more threat than a farm field is that the intentions of the planter don't change the flavor of the forage.  A food plot is no more attractive than the edge of a 160 acre bean field that meets a fence line, swamp edge, or grove.     Now imagine there are no farm fields or food plots at all, not even a decent yielding apple tree.  Deer will still communicate via scrape trees and licking branches during the rut.  If the current belief is that the prions spread via saliva, what's to stop wild deer from licking a branch that an infected buck has licked?  What's to stop a buck from rubbing their face all over a contaminated branch?    My fear is that lots of deer are going to be slaughtered in an area that just happens to have been a hot target for eradication before CWD was found.  I'm also worried we're going to get all kinds of bad rules imposed that won't do squat to actually stop the spread if the disease is actually in MN.  I'm worried we'll lose a critical habitat tool that allows us in harsh winter kill areas to help the deer make it through winter (food plots).    It'd be interesting to watch the DNR try to ban food plots.  Good luck defining what is and is not a food plot. 
  • Our Sponsors