Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

Eagle vs Lowrance differences in fishfinders??

11 posts in this topic

tjwierz2,
Eagle and Lowrance are to the sonar world as GMC and Chevrolet are to the truck world. They are made by the same company and are (basically) the same units. You just get your choice what name you want stamped on it. Both are excellent top-of-the-line units. Tight lines!

------------------
Adam Johnson
www.adamjohnsonfishing.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I did, went to the websites. The X71 and the Fishmark 160 are EXACTLY the same. One sells for $220 the other for $280. I dont get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so Im in Gander Mtn this week and notice that the Eagle and Lowrance fishfinders are alomst identical. Eagle has a Fishmark 160 that is identical to the Lowrance X71. Same resolution, same features, same buttons in the same places. Except the Eagle is $60 cheaper. The clerk said he didnt know of any differences and thought they may use the same parts etc...

Eagle has the Fishmark 240, exactly like the Lowrance X91 as well, except the Lowrance has more watts power, but everything else is the same...except $80 on the price tag.

Basically, for every unit Lowrance has now...Eagle has something pretty much identical...except its $40-$90 cheaper.

Has anyone used the Eagle fishfinders much. What are the differences between these companies? Just look at them and they look identical.

[This message has been edited by tjwierz2 (edited 10-15-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eagle and Lowrance finders are made by the same company. The only thing i have "heard" is that some internal parts are higher quality in the lowrance (ie gold connectors), but they are basically the same units.
That being said, i have had an eagle ultra 160x160 for 6 years and its been great (wont even die so i can move up to a 240x240!)
I really think performance really depends on the operator. About 3 years ago i spent a considerable amount of "onthewater" time experimenting to really learn how to use/read it. By using the unit in manual and the split zoom feature i can get very good bottom seperation. Then last year I used a underwater camera to learn even better what different bottom contents look like on the locator, small rock vs larger, sand vs muck etc.
My fishing partner (wife) used to laugh at all the "fishes" on the screen. Now when i till her that we are passing over a couple of 'eyes and to get ready for a hit, she believes. She was quite impressed the first few times this happened and she hooked up just after "the warning" grin.gif Now it is expected out of me, and she's disappointed if she doesnt get a bump at least!!
I am looking very hard at the fisheasy 240x240 or the garmin 240 for my next locator.
Xplorer

[This message has been edited by Xplorer (edited 10-16-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will throw in a good word for eagle too, but that is all I have every run. Very good units! Never had a problem with any of the 3 I own. The 240x240 unit has excellent detail. With any LEI product you may have to adjust the sensativity level or you may pick up everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some differences between the X-71 and the Fishmark 160. About the only one that you can actually see is the flasher screen on the X-71 it is the round display that was on the X-65, the 160 does not have it. The otheer differences are in programing and you wont see much of a difference there.

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

am considering the X91 too, I'm trying to learn a few things(X91 vs X71) 3000 watts peak to peak or 1500 watts...is it a marked difference to the average fisherguy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you said it, "Marked difference" The unit will better display targets with more watts. Don't sell yourself short, most people cheat themselves out of one of the most important pieces of equipment. Get the x-91. Good Luck

------------------
MILLE LACS AREA GUIDE SERVICE
651-271-5459 http://fishingminnesota.com/millelacsguide/
click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much D-man, you sound serious....thats what I needed to know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TJ
If you fish much at night, take a look at the screens with the back light on. Throw your coat over your head and the display unit to get a true picture of what they will be like at night. Three years ago I went through the same questions you have now. I went with the Lowrance for the better backlighting, not sure if the same difference exists in this year's models but it's worth checking. If you want to see my X-75 in action, just call and we'll hit "The Bear" for an evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Good question, why didn't they find any more?  Did those two infected deer parachute in?  Were they dropped by a helicopter?  I find it fascinating they could get as far as Lanesboro and they only find two out of thousands.  Like I said, they're bad at conspiracy.    Policing the borders?  How about a billboard, a radio ad, or a twitter campaign?  How about having the highway patrol pull over anyone with hooves or antlers sticking outta their truck box or laying on a flatbed coming across the border on the interstate?    My wealth and land ownership shouldn't disqualify me from questioning the DNR.  It used to be a staple of a free country to question your government.  Somehow now it's more important to kneel before the all knowing DNR and take whatever they want to shove in our mouths?  If this is real science and a real mitigation effort, let's have a discussion about it.  If the DNR wants to stop this spread, why are they not welcoming with open arms feedback like mine when it comes to import enforcement, and an effective PR campaign?  Cause guess what fella, lots of deer got hauled home from all kinds of places infected with CWD by uninformed folks that are going to cut up those critters and throw the brains and spinal cords out in the woods at home.    So yeah, this is either a giant hoax, or the DNR has no idea what the hell they're doing. 
    • I just checked on the fans that I bought, there 4.7 inchs sq and 1.25 thick. I thought they were 5 inch thick but I was wrong. They are 110v and I think I will put one inside on the bottom plate and see how it works. And I like where you have your fishingstar.
    • Slowly getting the outside buttoned up 
    • Yea I had that idea too 
    • I saw three or four huts in the little wet area in the lake vadnais area just off country road F.   But they would probably get upset if you set traps there...    right next to the new path that goes south along the east side of the lake. 
    • In the olden days, pigs were fed garbage.  Trichinosis was a problem.  Then laws were passed so any garbage fed to pigs had to be cooked first.  Problem went away.   According to CDC there hasn't been a case of trichinosis except from eating wild game like bear meat for many years.  
    • From a quick google search it looks like waveinn.com or the bay of e might be your best bets, if you don't want to buy from shimano.
    • Does anyone know of a place you can get spare Shimano Sedona spools?? I run braid in the summer and don't want to run it on the ice.
  • Our Sponsors