Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Johnny_Namakan

Cut on Paw?

5 posts in this topic

This weekend I went up to the shack to put out the cameras. The excursion was pretty uneventful until we got back to the truck. I noticed a little blood on the back seat where the dog was laying. She was acting normal and didn't appear to be in pain. I got out of the truck and went into the back seat and checked her over. i couldn't see blond anywhere and figured it was a bug bite that bled a little. So anyway, 1 1/2 hours later we get home and I let her out of the back seat and into the house. As she's walking through the kitchen she's leaving large amounts of blood in her tracks. I check her over and her front paw is covered in blood. Now I'm thinking she's been bleeding for the past 1.5 hours so I run out to the truck to to see if there is a pool of blood in the back seat. Nope nothing there, just the little drops that I spotted when we first packed up and left the woods. Anyway, I go back into the house and check her over. I have her sit and then I lay down to "look under the hood" so to speak. I wash off her paw thouroughly but still can't see a cut. Then I see the blood coming from between her pads. The cut isn't on the actual pads of her feet it's up inside, between the foot pad and the toe pads. I got some peroxide in there and got a better look and the cut and it looked pretty nasty. It's about 1/4"-1/2" long, but looked pretty deep. This all happened Saturday. I almost called the vet but I didn't. My plan was to first of all, try and get the bleeding to stop. If I could do that then I'd wait until today to bring her in, much cheaper than after hour emergency rates. I was able to stop the bleeding. I'm thinking that when she jumped out of the truck when we got home it must have opened the cut up. Since there was just a drop of blood in the truck it must not have been bleeding badly. So anyway, I put some triple antibotic ointment on it and wrapped it in gauze and kept it pretty tight to keep the cut closed. It hasn't bleed since Saturday and I've been changing the gauze twice a day along with putting more anitbotic ointment on it. My question is this: Is a cut on the foot like this something that would be stitched or would the vet do the same thing I am currently doing? If I call and ask the Vet I know what he'll say, "bring her in and let's take a look." Then $200 later I'm doing the same thing that I already am doing. I wouldn't think you could stitch this because just walking on it would probably rip the stitches open. Good luck trying to keep a dog off its feet too. I keep telling her that she has to lay down and stay off that foot, but for some reason she doesn't understand. grin She doesn't appear to be in pain, so doesn't limp or anything, and she still wants to run around and play fetch, which I won't allow her to do off course. My fear is infection, but with the gauze and ointment I should be able to keep that to a low risk. My hope is that with all the hunting dog owners on here that somebody will have first hand knowledge of treatment for this. Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you have it taken care of. I would just watch it but if you cleaned it up and have been keeping ointment on it you should not have anything to worry about.

I would save the $200.00 and just keep watching it.

Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to my pooch while hunting pheasants. We found a patch of grass in the middle of corn field... it turned out to be a junk pile. She cut basically the "webbing" between her toes on her front paw.

My vet did not stitch it; he just superglued it, put some antibiotics on there, wrapped it tight and I was out of there less than $50 later. She hunted the next day with the wrap on and had no issues. The bandage fell off a couple days later so I bought some antibiotics, ace bandage tape and some gauze and made my own wrapping for pheasant hunting the next weekend.

Hope this helps a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....

My vet did not stitch it; he just superglued it....

This is what I would do. The dog may not like it because it stings like the dickens, but I have done this in the past and then rubed some anticeptic on it and been good to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, guys. I do have some of that Liquid Bandage at home, which is basically superglue with an anticeptic. I was thinking of using that, but like it was mentioned, it stings pretty good. I think I'll put some of that on tonight and wrap it up good again. Darn dogs, they have to learn to be more careful! laugh Kind of makes me wonder WHEN she actually sliced her foot. It could have been right when we got into the woods for all I know. She probably ran on that darn thing for two hours before I noticed. High tolerance for pain I guess!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Rather than the concepts of teams I think it more appropriate to think in terms of philosophies. Each "team" has a philosophical way of dealing with certain issues: tax codes, immigration, war on drugs etc,  So even though your candidate may be weak you are going to vote, not for them, but for that teams way of dealing with those issues.   A simple example would be tax codes.  The democrats think individual taxes for the top 10%'s should be increased where the republicans believe that reducing taxes on that same 10% will stimulate growth through trickle down economics.   So in essence, you're not voting for a particular candidate, you're voting for the team that will deal with these issues in a way you feel is best. 
    • Like Obabma, he sets up a straw man false premise and then proceeds to attack said straw man.      He is deceived by the fact that the most polarized folks are the ones making the noise, thereby creating a false impression.    You persist in wanting to discuss this article.  Why is that?      
    • So lets recap.   Decriminalization will not reduce prison populations by a noticeable amount.    Will not reduce crime.   Will not reduce monies spent combating drug suppliers and dealers.   Will not lower the consumption rates.    - Will allow regular everyday citizens who use/possess and get caught, not ruin their lives with a crippling criminal record.   May encourage the the habitual users to seek treatment/help.      Which I have no issues with.   My issues are saying with decriminalization it will save tax payers any money.   That's my beef.    
    •   I didn't see the Socialist party listed

    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
  • Our Sponsors