Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hovermn

Older vs, Newer 25 outboard

10 posts in this topic

I have a '74 Johnson 25 hp short shaft on a 14' lund D/W. Speed is around 16-20 mph with 2 people, gear and a deck. This motor is not easy on gas, but it runs pretty decent.

How much of a difference would a newer motor have over mine. I think I remember hearing something about older outboards measured hp at the motor, while newer outboards are measured at the prop. Is this right? What year did they switch?

I guess I'd be happier with a more fuel efficient motor, a little better speed, and the peace of mind that goes with a newer motor. I was on the St. Croix between Hudson and just North of Stillwater yesterday, 16 miles round trip. I went through about 4 gals of gas. That can't be good, right?

Think I'd gain anything from a '90's outboard over the 70's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 70's 18hp Evinrude on my old 14ft boat. I could do about 17-20mph when light, and about 13-16mph when loaded up. If you went 16 miles and used 4 gals of gas compared to what I know mine use to do I'd say that sounds about right and maybe even good. As far as the peace of mind goes well... I used to love my old motor cause the compression checked out good and it always ran. There is a lot of room for opinion there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started to switch from crank shaft to prop shaft rating in 1983.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I really didn't have a basis to go by with the fuel, just thought it was a bit much. I have to be honest, I'm used to flying a hovercraft, which got much better mileage.

I know I lost some speed when I put a deck in the boat. The addition of 2 adults, gear, 2 batteries and trolling motors. The boat is weighted down some.

Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are probably fine with the motor you have, though a newer fuel injected motor or 4 stroke will get better mileage. I have a '76 14' Lund, pretty much the same boat with a flat floor, no deck up front though. I also run a transom mount t-motor and the battery is in the back. I have a 82-83 Mariner 15 horse longshaft. I have clocked with GPS at 31 with just me and gear, 25.5 with two guys and gear, and 17-18 with three guys and gear. My question to you is related to your prop. What do you have for a prop on that motor? I used to have a 12p prop on mine, broke a blade off and decided to replace it with a 10.5p prop. I decided to do that because I could just feel that the motor wasn't working to its full potential. I put that 10.5p prop on and she roars across the lake now. I would guess you probably have a 14p or 15p prop, and stepping down to a 12p or 13p prop might get her going for you. But that is only if the motor isn't revving as high as it should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have added...does the boat pop right up on plane or does it plow a bit before she goes up on plane? When you are in glass calm water how much faster can you go than when you are in a windy/choppy situation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference?

Approximately 10% of HP is lost in the gearcase. So yea, about 2 1/2 hp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't read the pitch on my prop now, but I've been told it's a power prop, light on the pitch. I've tried 2 props with larger pitch, but it's pretty boggy and gave a great reduction of speed.

As far as planing, it doesn't pop right up, but takes a little bit. It also seems to take the motor a while to reach full RPM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought an '07 Lund 1425 Classic tiller last year w/ a 25 HP Merc 4 stroke. Heavy boat for the size. Long story short, for performance and safety reasons I went from the factory 9.25" X 12.5" aluminum prop to a 10" X 9" composite prop.

I can now get 22 mph (gps) at 95% WOT with the livewell full and my 225 lb rear end, all in the back. It pops up on plane in about 5 to 7 seconds. I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour.

wow, that seems pretty good. At 22mph, that's 22 mpg which would equal almost 150 miles per 6 gallons.

I have a larger 14ft with a late 80's 25hp merc. I'd estimate that I can go about 30 miles at WOT per 6 gallon tank. That's with 2 guys/gear/etc

I don't think the mileage in the original post is all that bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We live in some sort of Bizarro world now - Sarah Palin calling Trump sinfully stupid.     Here's another one from Ann Coulter, who literally wrote a book "In Trump We Trust"    
    • You do realize that if the taxes were done that way, the cities would get $2.53 billion richer, and rural areas would get $2.53 billion poorer. The 7 county metro pays substantially more taxes (nearly 2/3 of the states total) than the other 80 counties in Minnesota combined, but only receives roughly half of the state expenditures.   Sorry to break it to you, but rural America is not fiscally solvent. Those citiots you speak of are bankrolling the entire country. It's easy to see on this chart: more urban states are to the left (givers) and more rural states are to the right (takers).  
    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
  • Our Sponsors