Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
hovermn

Older vs, Newer 25 outboard

Recommended Posts

I have a '74 Johnson 25 hp short shaft on a 14' lund D/W. Speed is around 16-20 mph with 2 people, gear and a deck. This motor is not easy on gas, but it runs pretty decent.

How much of a difference would a newer motor have over mine. I think I remember hearing something about older outboards measured hp at the motor, while newer outboards are measured at the prop. Is this right? What year did they switch?

I guess I'd be happier with a more fuel efficient motor, a little better speed, and the peace of mind that goes with a newer motor. I was on the St. Croix between Hudson and just North of Stillwater yesterday, 16 miles round trip. I went through about 4 gals of gas. That can't be good, right?

Think I'd gain anything from a '90's outboard over the 70's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 70's 18hp Evinrude on my old 14ft boat. I could do about 17-20mph when light, and about 13-16mph when loaded up. If you went 16 miles and used 4 gals of gas compared to what I know mine use to do I'd say that sounds about right and maybe even good. As far as the peace of mind goes well... I used to love my old motor cause the compression checked out good and it always ran. There is a lot of room for opinion there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I really didn't have a basis to go by with the fuel, just thought it was a bit much. I have to be honest, I'm used to flying a hovercraft, which got much better mileage.

I know I lost some speed when I put a deck in the boat. The addition of 2 adults, gear, 2 batteries and trolling motors. The boat is weighted down some.

Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are probably fine with the motor you have, though a newer fuel injected motor or 4 stroke will get better mileage. I have a '76 14' Lund, pretty much the same boat with a flat floor, no deck up front though. I also run a transom mount t-motor and the battery is in the back. I have a 82-83 Mariner 15 horse longshaft. I have clocked with GPS at 31 with just me and gear, 25.5 with two guys and gear, and 17-18 with three guys and gear. My question to you is related to your prop. What do you have for a prop on that motor? I used to have a 12p prop on mine, broke a blade off and decided to replace it with a 10.5p prop. I decided to do that because I could just feel that the motor wasn't working to its full potential. I put that 10.5p prop on and she roars across the lake now. I would guess you probably have a 14p or 15p prop, and stepping down to a 12p or 13p prop might get her going for you. But that is only if the motor isn't revving as high as it should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have added...does the boat pop right up on plane or does it plow a bit before she goes up on plane? When you are in glass calm water how much faster can you go than when you are in a windy/choppy situation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference?

Approximately 10% of HP is lost in the gearcase. So yea, about 2 1/2 hp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't read the pitch on my prop now, but I've been told it's a power prop, light on the pitch. I've tried 2 props with larger pitch, but it's pretty boggy and gave a great reduction of speed.

As far as planing, it doesn't pop right up, but takes a little bit. It also seems to take the motor a while to reach full RPM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought an '07 Lund 1425 Classic tiller last year w/ a 25 HP Merc 4 stroke. Heavy boat for the size. Long story short, for performance and safety reasons I went from the factory 9.25" X 12.5" aluminum prop to a 10" X 9" composite prop.

I can now get 22 mph (gps) at 95% WOT with the livewell full and my 225 lb rear end, all in the back. It pops up on plane in about 5 to 7 seconds. I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour.

wow, that seems pretty good. At 22mph, that's 22 mpg which would equal almost 150 miles per 6 gallons.

I have a larger 14ft with a late 80's 25hp merc. I'd estimate that I can go about 30 miles at WOT per 6 gallon tank. That's with 2 guys/gear/etc

I don't think the mileage in the original post is all that bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • I am ready except it looks like it’s going to be warm and buggy.
    • My buddy does the same always revs the four wheeler up before he leaves. On his sits he would have someone else drive him in bait while he gets in the stand they rev the four wheeler and take off. Dinner bell come and get it
    • No clue yet somewhere with a cheap motel and some public land
    • Who's ready for the season? Cant wait!
    • After a while we only started hunting evening because we never had any come in the AM. We also started making a bit of noise when baiting (rattling cans) when we had two Bears working. They started coming in right after we baited so the bait, after noon and stay behind hunter seemed to work pretty well.
    • sorta helps, I'll find it...  thanks... me and google just got it.....     have to go see!!
    • Hall of Fame? You must be joking...... Every player starts out like that. No one starts out with a 23 m dollar contract. He still averaged about 15 million per year for his career, that average probably goes up if he plays past 2018. I think he will be ok.
    • Joe was also the 74th highest paid player the year he won the MVP. You may say he is over paid now but he was underpaid 1st half of his career. @Bobby Bass   I don't think Joe is a future Hall of Famer, not even close to borderline but a great player none the less. I think if the Twins would have made a deeper playoff runs back when Morneau was healthy and Santana was Cy-young would have helped. But Joes playoff numbers are terrible. I could maybe see HOF if he would have stayed at catcher his entire career though..... But he will more than likely end up winning a gold glove at 2 positions, and with one being catcher that is pretty elite.
    • Big Dave most if not all pro contracts are paying you for what you have already done with the hope that you will continue to produce. Looking at todays contract Joe's is not to out of line for a future Hall of Famer
    • Great! He is finally earning a contract close to what he is being paid. 
  • Our Sponsors