Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
polarsusd81

Dan, Ken, or Steve - Canon 1D question.

Recommended Posts

Any of you guys ever use the original 1D? I found a great deal on one and wanted to see what you guys know about them. One of the main concerns would be battery life. I would be shooting without post-shot review to conserve battery, but do you guys know about how many shots one could get with a fully charged battery? I know it is only a 4.1 MP sensor but from what I have read, the images have much more life to them than even the newer lower end bodies. The AF performance is one of the huge advantages of the camera. I guess I am trying to find out if I should really do it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom, I have only shot the 1D a couple of times, and I don't know what to tell you about battery life.

As for owning the 1D compared with other cameras, you're getting into so many tradeoffs of age and performance that a person could write a book on them. IMO there was a huge level of improvement in the 1 series after Canon split it into the two separate lines. The 1Ds and 1D Mk2 each provided strong advances over the 1D, and there are 1D2 and 1Ds bodies on the market with tons of life left in them for around $1,000.

There's no doubt the silky shutter button, autofocus performance and a bunch of other 1 series goodies are much better than even the newest entry-level bodies, and that can have an impact on a photographer's performance. If a certain piece of gear makes a person feel better about their work and more interested in it, then that's a good piece of gear to own.

That being said, for me it would depend on just how good the deal was. I mean, if I found a 1D for $300 I might jump on it, while at $600 I'd pass it by.

I don't worry much about Mp count. I've seen large prints from the 4.1 Mp 1D that were stunning. I'm interested in where you read the 1D images have more "life" to them than the lower-end bodies. I've shot a lot of 1 series bodies, as well as using the xxD series bodies daily, and using low-end bodies a backups for a couple years, and I can't say I agree with the idea that native IQ from the 1D has more life than lower-end camera bodies.

Lots, lots to think about when making such a decision. For me, saving a bit more and picking up a 1D2 would be the route to take. That's just me though.

Good topic. Makes a person think things through. It'll be real interesting to hear Dan's and Ken's perspectives on this. smilesmile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is at 400, so it is a little more than your number to pull the trigger, but well below what you said you wouldn't consider it. I might see if I could get it for 350. I talked to the guy and he said they get about 400 shots with 5 second review.

Sorry, it was in comparing to some of the earlier bodies. I misread some reviews on the other FM.

The seller is a pretty high end advertising photographer.

Your point about being more interested because of a certain piece of gear would definitely apply in this scenario. Don't get me wrong the XT is great, but having the XT in combo with a 1D would be awesome at that price.

Maybe I am getting overly excited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom, the excitement is understandable. Any time I have a 1 series in my hand, I'm VERY reluctant to return it to its owner. gringrin

But 400 images on a battery charge is horrible. You couldn't even shoot a wedding on one charge. How many batteries does it come with? My guess would be a new 1D battery should hold for many more images than that, and if these are the original batteries they are well worn out, probably. I don't know if the 1D uses the same batteries as the the rest of the 1 series (up to the Mk3, which uses a different battery).

If so, it's easy to get new batteries. Canon still sells them, and so do some knock-off companies. If it takes its own battery and not those in the later 1 series, I'd definitely find out if you can still get some of them.

And we haven't talked about shutter count. I believe the 1D was rated to 200,000 shutters. If this guy's a pro and has used that body since it came out, it may well be that it's approached or exceeded the shutter rating. Do you have a shutter count from him?

Edit: OK, did a little searching and found on the B&H Web site that the 1D takes the same battery as the rest of the 1 series until the Mk3, so you can still buy them. However, that'll definitely drive up the cost of your purchase. I haven't priced out the knock-offs, but the Canon 1D batteries run about $120 new. If he's only including one battery that gets 400 images per charge, I'd definitely tell him $350 is as high as you'll go. If there are two batteries that seem OK, and if the 1D simply used so much battery power that 400 is all you can get (the later the camera model, the more efficient they seem to be on power consumption), then I'd be inclined to pay the money. Battery charge may not be a big issue for the guy. If he did most of his ad work in studio, he could just use the adapter and plug the camera into a wall outlet for power. You won't have that option.

Edit II: Canon says a freshly charged good battery in the 1D should be good for 500 images at normal operating temps, so it appears the camera simply was a hog for power consumption. I don't know if that was RAW or JPEG numbers, or if it matters which mode is used. It might be that more shots can be gotten in jpeg mode since they are smaller files. So maybe it boils down to how many batteries the guy's including. And shutter count, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no personal experience with the 1D. The only person I know who used and/or uses one is a newspaper guy who bought one when studying to be a journalist in college. He now works for a paper, has had the camera overhauled at least once, and uses nothing else. I guess it's a testimonial of sorts. No other thoughts besides what Steve said as to improvements in sensors and other features since the 1D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have shot the 1D a few times, I do prefer the Mark II. The 400 shot per battery seems to be around the average for that camera. That has always been the knock on it. The next big concern would definitely be shutter count. Replacing a shutter on a 1 series is $350 to $475. Suddenly that $350 or $400 dollar camera my not be such a great deal.

A lot of guys keep a 1D around because of the flash sync speed, if I recall it is 1/400s. Nice feature to have. I know sports guys that keep one around as a backup just for that reason alone.

For me the shutter count would a big factor. That camera is still producing beautiful images, but there may be better values to consider. As a remote, backup type camera with high sync speeds I would consider it, as a primary...well I would have to think hard about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never counted specifically, but even when using IS lenses I've been routinely able to get well beyond 1,500 images from a 1D2 or 2n with a fresh battery. On the recent sharp-tailed grouse shoot with Ken I was using a 1D Mk3 and an IS lens and captured about 1,300 jpegs before the battery dropped down to 2/3 full. They just seem to get better and better on power consumption.

Now, the autofocus motor uses a lot of battery power on the 1D, and if you use it for posed work you'd be able to leave it on manual focus, which would help. In a wedding situtation, you could continue to use your XT for candids with a longer lens and reserve the 1D for the posed images. In many posed wedding situations, you could even use the power adapter and an extension cord and run off a wall outlet. If you have two batteries for it and can also use electrical power, that'd be plenty for most weddings. Also in most cases, when one battery is done you can usually have it charging somewhere nearby while you're using up the second battery.

Just some more food for thought. You already know which way I'd go. But I'll add that if you get two good batteries and the shutter count isn't over half way toward the rated max, I'd be very tempted to pick it up at $350-400.

On the other hand, for $400 or a bit over you could pick up a good used 30D and have a more modern camera with more megapixels and excellent noise performance. Ahhh, the options never end! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have decided against it. I asked for a shutter count and if there was an additional battery and I got a "no" for both questions. I think it is safe to say I wont get that one.

Thanks for the help guys. It seemed like a great deal at first, but upon further review, better to use the money for something else.

The battery consumption really does seem poor. Thinking about what I get with the grip and sterling teks in the XT, the 1D isn't even worth comparing. I just didn't know what you guys get with the big boy cameras.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to chime in late with this (although already been covered) it's not unusual for me to get 2000+ clicks with my Mark II and a good battery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom, my next body will almost certainly be a 1D Mk2 or Mk2n. You can find lightly used Mk2 bodies all day long on used Web sites for $1,000 to $1,200. It's worth saving for.

The fact that they wouldn't give you a shutter count is telling. You can easily find out the shutter count on a 1 series Canon body. I'd bet this one is WAY up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Tom that makes it a no brainer, no shutter count, no sale! Especially on a 1D! I'm with Ken and am normally +2,000 shots per battery on the IIN. The 50D from what I can see is even better than that. Better than the 20D/30D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, I agree. I've got the grip with the two batteries for the 50D, and it seems like 2-3 weeks between changes sometimes. I don't shoot a lot, every day, but I shoot every day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Bald Eagle skimmed over on Saturday.  Today after the relatively light snow there are many areas where the cracks look like water came up through and discolored the ice.  At least that what I think happened. Since there was only an inch or so of snow I am surprised that it pushed the ice down and let water come up.  Anyone else have an explanation?
    • I am assuming it was either an Ion, SM Lithium, or drill setup... If it is, no need for a slush copter. I put my slush bucket over the hole... drill... then reverse. In 12" of ice I can do 6 holes with one dump of the bucket. Every 6" beyond that takes another dumping of the bucket.
    • I have the parts on order to get the unit set up for the ice.  I ended up buying a marcum lithium shuttle for my LX7 and then plan to mount the Helix on the shuttle that came with my LX7.  I am hoping to find walk-able ice in my area this weekend and hopefully the parts show up before then so i can give it a go.  I have the pre-chirp model of the helix so with a little luck i can get them to cooperate.
    • Big home game tonight against a very young and vastly improved Calgary team.  Should be a great game.
    • I sold my old 4 stroke and bought a new electric this year because of the fumes.  Even drilling 4 holes nearly gassed me every time.  
    • I'd be careful about extending these older guys at this point....extending Koivu was a mistake and if Staal proves out and he's worth it we can sign him later...like we should have done with Koivu...but we've already been down that discussion. Agree on the 3 on 3 OT wins...we showed more aggressiveness, it paid off...and then it becomes a confidence factor which we certainly should have going forward.  Big game tonight.  
    • If you're rolling with 4 and a half inch car speakers which seem pretty standard for wheelhouses, you're just not gonna get much for bass out of the things, especially if they are el cheapos.  Which also seems pretty standard for wheelhouses. I don't own a wheelhouse, but for the portable, the boat, the garage, etc, I use a Bluetooth speaker.  Lasts all day on a charge and puts out pretty rich sound for $100.
    • Yup... you're right. 3000# for both brakes and licensing
    • Electrics augers are crazy nice in wheelhouse. I know that propane and 4-strokes give off WAY less fumes then the augers of yesteryear... but the new auger setups essentially have a slush copter built in with the reverse option.
    •   Not a chance that Nils is closing, quite the opposite as they can't make them fast enough. The Tanaka powerhead and transmission made by Hitachi (great product btw)was discontinued a few years back along with many other Tanaka power tools.   I thought that might effect Nils but timing and trend of going electric plus new higher torque drills and lithium higher amp hr batteries made the transition seamless.      
  • Our Sponsors