Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Checking from behind


Hockey Guy

Recommended Posts

I’m curious to find out what some of you guys that played (or play) hockey think about the current way the NCAA calls checking from behind. Now I know I’m kind of an ‘Old School’ player, but I can’t stress strongly enough how much I disagree with the way they are calling this penalty. Notice I’m not saying I disagree with real checking from behind being a penalty, just the way they are calling it.

If a player is facing the boards digging for the puck and a guy comes out of nowhere and nails him in the back, that’s checking from behind. That is a dangerous play and definitely should be called. I have a problem when two guys are racing each other for the puck and one guy turns his back at the last second. In my opinion, the guy that turned his back should not only expect to get hit, but pretty much expect that he’s going to be put through the glass for having the nerve to turn his back in the first place. If you are in any situation where you know you can get hit, you should be expecting to get hit. The guy from Wisconsin that got ejected on Friday night should never have gotten a penalty for that. First of all, I think he hit the Gopher player more from the side if anything, and you can’t tell me that the Gopher player didn’t expect to get hit in that situation.

The way they are calling it now is a joke. The player that turns his back should get a penalty for being stupid or a penalty for diving. What’s next? If a goalies not facing you, you can’t shoot the puck? Like I said, I’m old school. We used to have concussions when I was growing up too. We called them bad headaches and went back in the game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm 25 and played hockey my whole life. I agree that it is a joke. I don't want anyone to get hurt but that is going too far. I thought it was fine how it was before. Making the officials call a major and a game misconduct on any checking from behind is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ta[PoorWordUsage]

I agree completely. The worst part with these ticky-tac rules is players will over-exaggerate the actual hit to draw the big penalty. Refs should just pony up and call it a 2 min boarding. Only call the big one when it is blatant.

In my opinion there are way too many light penalties called anyway. After playing hockey all my life, I know the type of things that can take guys down. Sometimes it looks like a yard sale out there with guys flailing all over the place to draw penalties. A little hook on the arm and the guy will bring it up so it brushes his facemask and bingo off his feet. Gimme a break. Everybody knows that if you give that same guy a legitimate lane to the net, it would take a friggin train to take him down.

Let it go, Let em play, call the major stuff, or the things that really take away good scoring chances. Let the players decide who wins the game, not a whistle happy ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that they are calling more penalties because they just do stupid things and slashing sticks, holding, everything like that wouldnt be a fun game to watch and decide who wins... maybe deciding who wins doing the cheap stuff. I dont like it when players are in the corner faced to the boards and the opposite players behind the player cross checks in the back, it ticks me off, thats gotta hurt! But I like the way it is now even though there are some bad calls sometimes but we just have to deal with it, thats why we have legs to catch them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hockeyguy,

Well said. I couldn't agree with you more. I think the reason we have so many bad calls is that the referees are new to this call and cannot see what should be a 5 minute major, 2 minute call or non-call. It is a fast game and I think we need to let the refs have a year or so to make the right call. This can't go on forever, and I think it is only a matter of time before we see checking from behind for how it should be.

Look at diving calls or even interference calls. Obstruction? They still don't really know how to call that. That wasn't mastered overnight. Well, maybe in Grand Forks it was.

SIOUX!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.