Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Lens for fishing shots


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Just curious if you have a favorite lens for shooting fishing pics in a boat? I'm mostly thinking about portrait shots where the angler is holding up the fish. I have a Nikon D-200 & have been using a Tamron 17-50mm which has worked great so far. Are there better options & what are the advantages? I'm new to digital photographer but I'm learning a lot from this forum.

Thanks, Vern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Vern, I think you've already got a great lens for fishing pictures.

There is a common photographic technique that makes fish look much bigger, and it required a wider angle lens. You zoom out as wide as you can go with an ultrawide zoom, the angler holds the fish far from his/her body, and the photographer gets really close to the fish to take the picture. Because of the distortion in such lenses, the fish is rendered bigger than life.

For your camera, the most affordable option I know of is the Sigma 10-20mm, which retails for about $475. On your camera, because of its sensor size, your 17-50 acts approximately like a 26-75mm lens. The 10-22, which is specifically designed for your sensor size, will act like a 16-35, and at 16/17mm, you have true ultrawide capability.

It's a chunk of change to lay out for a fish taking lens, but once you start using an ultrawide at the wide end, a host of new photographic options open up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are right on track with your lens choice. You want something wide enough to capture the subject but not so wide you end up with distortion...well let me rephrase that. If you want the fish to look a bit bigger a wider lens could do that smile A fish eye (no pun intended) lens will give you some real distortion that will give you some cool looks, but I would not consider it for ALL of my fish shots.

I think the creative use of flash can help the average fish shot out. But that is a whole another topic to cover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Vern, I think you've already got a great lens for fishing pictures.

There is a common photographic technique that makes fish look much bigger, and it required a wider angle lens. You zoom out as wide as you can go with an ultrawide zoom, the angler holds the fish far from his/her body, and the photographer gets really close to the fish to take the picture. Because of the distortion in such lenses, the fish is rendered bigger than life.

This is a shot that Steve took to give you a example of what he is talking about.

BigMouth-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one was shot by Deitz with my Canon 1DII (1.3x) crop and a 17-35 at 17mm (22mm converted).

3629928340_b285ea58e6_z.jpg

The fish was just over 20" long and was 5lb 6oz on the Berkley digital, but the photo makes it look much bigger. But this one isn't your typical long arm fish photo either. Angles from which you shoot a photo can make or break it. This shot Deitz was kneeling on the front deck to get a lower angle, and the fish more or less centered over my body and just slightly out in front, looks like it covers me up.

Then again, if you are looking for something different, longer lenses can do some pretty cool stuff too. This one was shot with the 1DII and a 70-200 at 200mm (260 converted).

5528036340_e1c1362d7b_z.jpg

For a boat, wider is likely going to win every time, but on the ice it can be a whole different story. Your 17-50 can probably do some pretty good work for you, but a bit wider like Steve recommended would sit quite nicely in the boat. Next time out, practice a few different angles in your boat and run your current lens on the wide side to see what you can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great information as usual guys! Great pic samples too. I'll keep practicing with this lens for now but I'm sure I'll add more options down the road.

- Vern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always more fun to be had, Vern. smile

The shot Jim put up I took with the Canon 30D and Canon 10-22mm. Because the 30D has a 1.6 crop sensor, the lens is the equivalent of 16mm when zoomed out as far as it'll go.

So 16-17mm equivalent is all you need to make an 11 pound laker's head look five times bigger than a 250 lb guy's head. Is that a fish picture lens or what! gringrin

But that's just one fish pic technique, and one that quite a few people frown upon, since it doesn't offer a realistic look at the size of the fish compared with the person in the pic. In any 16-foot or longer boat, your current camera/lens setup will be fine. smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • By The way that didn't work either!! Screw it I'll just use the cellular. 
    • It’s done automatically.  You might need an actual person to clear that log in stuff up.   Trash your laptop history if you haven’t tried that already.
    • 😂 yea pretty amazing how b o o b i e s gets flagged, but they can't respond or tell me why I  can't get logged in here on my laptop but I can on my cellular  😪
    • I grilled some brats yesterday, maybe next weekend will the next round...  
    • You got word censored cuz you said        B o o b ies….. haha.   Yeah, no… grilling is on hiatus for a bit.
    • Chicken mine,  melded in Mccormick poultry seasoning for 24 hours.  Grill will get a break till the frigid temps go away!
    • we had some nice weather yesterday and this conundrum was driving me crazy  so I drove up to the house to take another look. I got a bunch of goodies via ups yesterday (cables,  winch ratchet parts, handles, leaf springs etc).   I wanted to make sure the new leaf springs I got fit. I got everything laid out and ready to go. Will be busy this weekend with kids stuff and too cold to fish anyway, but I will try to get back up there again next weekend and get it done. I don't think it will be bad once I get it lifted up.    For anyone in the google verse, the leaf springs are 4 leafs and measure 25 1/4" eye  to eye per Yetti. I didnt want to pay their markup so just got something else comparable rated for the same weight.   I am a first time wheel house owner, this is all new to me. My house didn't come with any handles for the rear cables? I was told this week by someone in the industry that cordless drills do not have enough brake to lower it slow enough and it can damage the cables and the ratchets in the winches.  I put on a handle last night and it is 100% better than using a drill, unfortatenly I found out the hard way lol and will only use the ICNutz to raise the house now.
    • I haven’t done any leaf springs for a long time and I can’t completely see the connections in your pics BUT I I’d be rounding up: PB Blaster, torch, 3 lb hammer, chisel, cut off tool, breaker bar, Jack stands or blocks.   This kind of stuff usually isn’t the easiest.   I would think you would be able to get at what you need by keeping the house up with Jack stands and getting the pressure off that suspension, then attack the hardware.  But again, I don’t feel like I can see everything going on there.
    • reviving an old thread due to running into the same issue with the same year of house. not expecting anything from yetti and I already have replacement parts ordered and on the way.   I am looking for some input or feedback on how to replace the leaf springs themselves.    If I jack the house up and remove the tire, is it possible to pivot the axel assembly low enough to get to the other end of the leaf spring and remove that one bolt?   Or do I have to remove the entire pivot arm to get to it? Then I also have to factor in brake wire as well then. What a mess   My house is currently an hour away from my home at a relatives, going to go back up and look it over again and try to figure out a game plan.           Above pic is with house lowered on ice, the other end of that leaf is what I need to get to.   above pic is side that middle bolt broke and bottom 2 leafs fell out here is other side that didnt break but you can see bottom half of leaf already did but atleast bolt is still in there here is hub assembly in my garage with house lowered and tires off when I put new tires on it a couple months ago. hopefully I can raise house high enough that it can drop down far enough and not snap brake cable there so I can get to that other end of the leaf spring.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.