Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Steve Foss

Proper Mossberg choke tube?

7 posts in this topic

Never been a slugster before (always rifles), but I've got a Mossberg 500A I'm shooting for deer. Standard barrel, 12 gauge, 2 3/4 inch 1 oz standard slugs. It's got a modified choke tube. I thought that might knock down the wings on the slugs and hurt accuracy, since I was told at the shooting store standard slugs should be shot through an improved cylinder. None of the stores had improved tubes that fit my gun, so I went with a skeet tube, which I was told is just a touch more open than an improved.

Thoughts?

I'm sticking with the original barrel, and am not in the market for a rifled slug barrel and all that, since I'll be doing the pushing in thick woods while others post, and I won't even be able to see a deer farther than 50 yards, let alone shoot farther.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've hunted with slugs for many years and a few years ago, attended a seminar that covered many aspects of deer hunting including selecting the right ammunition. The diameters of rifled slugs vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. In order to find out which one shoots best through your barrel you'll need to try a few different brands. If you're using a modified choke, I would start by trying using Winchester, because from what I learned their rifled slugs are the smallest diameter. The next largest diameter is Federal and the largest diameter is made by Remington. I would also try Brenneke unless one of the above slugs shoots very well for you. With the skeet tube, I would try Remington. Before using a rifled barrel, I shot Remingtons through an improved cylinder and they worked very well. There may be some new rounds out there I'm not familiar with also.

Keep in mind that this information is about 10 years old, so manufacturers may have changed things in that time. You might want to check with a reliable gun shop to verify if that information is still accurate.

If you continue hunting with slugs, I would also highly recommend getting a rifled barrel with a cantilever scope mount for your Mossberg. I've got the same gun as you in a 20 ga. and have taken many deer with it from 50 to 120 yds. never firing more than one shot per deer. Most of those deer gave me very good targets - never needed to shoot one running, but my point is the rifled barrels are very accurate and worth the money.

[This message has been edited by uffdapete (edited 11-15-2002).]

[This message has been edited by uffdapete (edited 11-15-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Catfish,

Well once again I work in the Gun Industry and here is the skinny. You can shoot slugs through a modified choke but be aware it is NOT recommended. As you know the choke is a constriction of the barrel. By shooting slugs though a mod or more constricted barrel you run the risk of bananaing your barrel kind of like the cartoons. But serious harm or death could result.
Anyways uffdapete has a point. Different manufactures have a different combination of slugs that work for their particular group. All in all pattern your gun accordingly to what shoots the best with the skeet tube in. A skeet tube is actually a little bigger than a cylinder which is a little bigger than an IC. You may get some wobble when you shoot slugs outta a skeet tube. If you notice cuts in the paper when you shoot instead of nice O's then the slug is tumbling and you will need to find different ammo or a different choke.
Did some testing a few years ago and shot a smooth bore barrel with a mod choke using rifled slugs. I shot all the major brands (remington, winchester, federal, lightfield, hornady and brenekke) and found that at 50yrds nothing hit a 12 inch target. So yes, accuracy is compromised when shooting through a choke that is too small. Well hope this helps.

Good Luck! smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks gents. It helps. wink.gif

I've got 2 3/4 federal slugs that I'll be patterning through the skeet choke. We'll see. Probably, it's best I hunt up an improved, though, if the slugs tumble.

In the long run, uffda, I may get the slug barrel with the cantilever. Runs about $169 where I shop, though I posted an inquiry a month or two ago here if anyone had one for sale used and got no replies.

Mostly, I think I'm just trying to get through this season OK before buying a good used Savage model 99, or a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem for deer from now on. Then the shotgun will be only for the birds. I'm building my guns back up after selling them all off several years ago. Dumb, I know! Worst loss was the model 99 in .300 Savage, pre-WWII with the brass counter and full buckhorn sights. blush.gif

------------------
Steve Foss
Superior, Wis.
stfcatfish@yahoo.com

[This message has been edited by stfcatfish (edited 11-16-2002).]

[This message has been edited by stfcatfish (edited 11-16-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

stfcatfish
That selling off the Savage must really hurt!
But if you hurry there's one just like that on Gunsamerica.com for $835.00! Brass rotor and all!

I wish I had the money to get it, they were nice guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

stfcatfish,

I use a mossberg 500 for deer also, been think of upgrading to riffled barrel but have no need to. I shoot it with I.C. 3inch 1 o.z. remingtons and shoot 1 inch groups at 50 yards with normal ribbed vent sights. I would suggest going to find the I.C. choke, just because of the groups I recieve with my gun with this setup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Joneshat. I've got the ribbed barrel and double-bead sight like you. Think I'll look up an improved choke. An inch at 50 yards is as good as I'm going to need pushing the woods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We live in some sort of Bizarro world now - Sarah Palin calling Trump sinfully stupid.     Here's another one from Ann Coulter, who literally wrote a book "In Trump We Trust"    
    • You do realize that if the taxes were done that way, the cities would get $2.53 billion richer, and rural areas would get $2.53 billion poorer. The 7 county metro pays substantially more taxes (nearly 2/3 of the states total) than the other 80 counties in Minnesota combined, but only receives roughly half of the state expenditures.   Sorry to break it to you, but rural America is not fiscally solvent. Those citiots you speak of are bankrolling the entire country. It's easy to see on this chart: more urban states are to the left (givers) and more rural states are to the right (takers).  
    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
  • Our Sponsors