Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
fishinmajishin

Copywriting photos

5 posts in this topic

I have a pic I would like to share/post, but I really don't want to see it show up on someone's HSOforum some day. I once emailed some pics to a Canadian fishing outfitter I used, and he used them without permission in his brochures. I'm by no means an experienced photographer, but this one pic is really special to me.

So my question is, what do I need to do to "stamp" it so I can retain it as my own? Just insert some text over the photo?

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, sorry I asked. I guess it really wont matter. It's really not that great I guess.

This photo was taken at 11:30 pm on June 9th about 150 miles NE of Winnepeg. I did not edit the photo at all. As far as the camera settings I couldn't tell you. I was just enjoying an evening by the fire with out a sound or care in the world. It was bright overcast night like none you'll see here in Minnesota. hembryocampfire.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fishing, you can place text over it. That's what I do. But it just helps keep an honest person honest. If someone wants to pull an image off an online posting and use it for their own purposes, that's what they'll do.

You can pretty well prevent that by making the text so large across the photo that it would be a big pain to photoshop out, but then of course it makes the picture look bad, too.

It's a very nice picture, and I don't blame you for wanting to protect yourself.

For what it's worth, your photo is immediately copyrighted upon capture, but by registering it with the U.S. Copyright Office you can get more compensation if you sue someone for stealing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your info. I knew you'd reply. Ya after thinking about it and comparing it to "real" photography such as your work, this really doesn't merit any worry over copywriting issues. Thanks for the kind words anyhoo. The photo isn't the quality that you guys get, but I've got a simple digital camera that works for me. I just thought the photo was kinda neat and people might like to see it. Sorry I thought I read that 800 horizontal works but it appears the standard 640 would have been better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fishin, it's a photo that means a lot to you. That's all that really matters. No photo needs to be compared to others, IMO, because each stands on its own. Since you are pleased with it and it speaks to you, then you have satisfied the only one who is important in this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • which models of striker bibs/ coat?
    • That little doe is a sweetheart. Reminds me why I gave up hunting. But I did it for more than six decades from MN to MT to AK and Canada. Before somebody jumps in with a snide  comment, I don't care if YOU do it but it is just not for me any more. Carry on. Nice pix....couple nice looking bucks.
    • I fish for monster bass too. But yeah, when one is the master of walleyes one tends to be an elitist... 
    • I agree; stay away from the extended warranty.  If my dealership (Village Chevrolet) won't honor the original warranty, what makes you think they will honor an extended warranty?  This problem was discovered well before my warranty ran out and they still treated me like an ugly sister...
    • Knock yourself out. IMO, pro basketball is a terrible sport.         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           Here's what they think of the Gophers in Iowa.....    
    • Wait till they lose the game.....  
    • You two must be elitist walleye guys. 
    • I can't say I'm much in agreement with Gary Johnson on this issue and I can admit it. I will say however that it makes more sense than the deal Pence struck with Carrier.   1. The carrier deal handed away state money while still being a net LOSS of jobs in that state. Johnson's program enticed new business into his state and resulted in a net GAIN of jobs and probably tourism dollars as well.  2. I think these types of deals should be handled as locally as possible. It's called representative government. Maybe it makes sense in the New Mexico deal that it be handled at the state level since it probably effects the state as a whole at least to some degree but I don't know. The Indiana deal should have been handled locally, especially if any of the tax cuts promised were property taxes. Those benefit communities at a more local level and the jobs saved benefit communities at a more local level. The state government possibly should not be handling these things but the Federal Government most assuredly should not be involved in these deals.  3. I'm pretty sure that the threat of interference with federal contracts had much more to do with the Carrier deal anyway so why did they give Carrier any tax breaks? I thought Trump was a tough guy and a strong armer? In the New Mexico deal, tax cuts are about the only leverage someone would have to bring that extra revenue and jobs into the state.   I'll say it again, I'm really not in favor of the government picking winners and losers. I do think the Pence deal is something that happens every day but the only difference is it happens at a local level and you don't have a blow hard President-elect taking credit for it normally. Time will tell whether it was a good deal or if the rest of the manufacturing community will hold the Government for ransom now like every professional sports franchise does these days.    Gary Johnson is in favor of replacing the current Tax code with a 'Fair Tax" system.
    • I think Purple means, our BullHeads!
  • Our Sponsors