Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NETim

Lowrance sonar data sharing

12 posts in this topic

OK, I've got two 520c's in my new boat. They came with rev 1.7 s/w loaded on them.

I liked the idea of sonar data sharing, so I upgraded to rev 2.3 s/w. Haven't had the boat out since, so I don't know if it hurt me or not. (Only had the boat out 2x previously.)

Anyway I can display the depth data on the bowmounted 520 from the console unit, which I expected.

The question is, is it possible to share/display the actual sonar data on the bowmount unit, i.e., graphical data?

I'm satisfied with just the digital depth data but if I can get more out of the system, I'm all for it.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the new Lowrance Expansion Port let you share sonar data if you have the ethernet connections on your units? I haven't used one but I was under the impression that's why they came out with it, so you could share sonar info from 1 transducer between multiple displays at the same time????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it does, but I'm not sure if the broadband sounder is required also. It appears he was referring to the simple LowranceNET configuration in which you cannot share sonar AFAIK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, with just the 520s he for sure won't be able to share anything other than the digital depth reading.

I'm not sure but I think that adding the expansion port and the ethernet cables will allow sharing the sonar display. The Lowrance documentation on this isn't very clear though, and I don't think too many people are using it yet (probably because they already have a transducer on each sonar unit, but down the road as people buy new units maybe the expansion port will become a lot more popular).

I don't think the broadband sounder is required to share displays, I think that enhances your display (ie. deep water), and can be shared over the expansion port, but is not required. It's a pricey little bugger too grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not up to speed at all with this new whiz bang technology. The 520's are connected together via the NMEA and an ethernet interface. I'm not sure what each interface brings to the ballgame.

I would think the combination would be enough bandwidth to provide more than just the digital data but maybe that's in the future?

Thanks for the feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been eyeballing the broadband sounder but don't think it's worth it for the lakes I fish which are typically shallower. They say it really improves the clarity and definition from the promo videos I've watched but it'd be tough to justify that price for that much gained.

I think you may be right about just needing the expansion port and not the broadband sounder to share sonar data. I know there was some confusion when it was debuted that the broadband sonar unit required the expansion port but it was found out that you do not if just connecting to one depthfinder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though Ranger told me that the two 520's were fully connected, I went ahead and looked the console unit last night. Lo and behold, the ethernet connector was empty.

I am tempted to get an ethernet cable to at least temporarily connect the two units just to see what, if anything, it will gain me.

Information on this is difficult to come by, even on Lowrance's HSOforum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still not sure, but now I read something that makes me think the ethernet cable between the two 520s might let you share the sonar display. I know this was not an option before the ethernet port and the newest software version, but now it might be an option. Like you say, there sure isn't very clear info about this yet. Your best bet might be to tough it out on hold with Lowrance and ask their technical staff, they should know right away if the ethernet cable will let you share the sonar diplay between two units. Post back and let us know what you find out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the the LMS-520 and the LCX-27 Networked together with the LowranceNet and the ethernet cable. The LowranceNet is like a computer network that allows you to share certain hardware between the units on the network. Most of the Networks are setup to just share the GPS Antenna, but can also be setup to monitor engine functions, fuel consumption and even livewell water temperature. With the Network the GPS can also share waypoints between the units. (they will not share trails,icons or back ground maps such as Navionics or Lakemaster)

The Ethernet cable allows you to share sonar display data between both units by specifying which transducer you which to utilize. Both units will only work off one transducer at a time and you select this in one of the MENU functions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ethernet cable allows you to share sonar display data between both units by specifying which transducer you which to utilize. Both units will only work off one transducer at a time and you select this in one of the MENU functions.

Nice. Thanks for the info. I've got 4 units networked together via the LowranceNet but they are all a few years old and predate the ethernet connection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the the LMS-520 and the LCX-27 Networked together with the LowranceNet and the ethernet cable. The LowranceNet is like a computer network that allows you to share certain hardware between the units on the network. Most of the Networks are setup to just share the GPS Antenna, but can also be setup to monitor engine functions, fuel consumption and even livewell water temperature. With the Network the GPS can also share waypoints between the units. (they will not share trails,icons or back ground maps such as Navionics or Lakemaster)

The Ethernet cable allows you to share sonar display data between both units by specifying which transducer you which to utilize. Both units will only work off one transducer at a time and you select this in one of the MENU functions.

OK, I haven't seen this option on the Menu but maybe it becomes active when the unit senses the ethernet connection?

Maybe I should just bite the bullet and give Lowrance tech support a call before I buy a cable, even it is only $40.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
    • Well Molly doesn't have any snow on her.   You been drinkin?  
    • 70 pages dealing with Donald Trump and I can't find much that says anything on the positive side, of course in the past year and a half he hasn't said much that's been positive either.
  • Our Sponsors