Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Cheeser

Problem with '91 Grand Prix

6 posts in this topic

Hi guys -

OK, this one has me stumped, maybe one of you guys can help.

I have a 91 Pontiac Grand Prix LE, 3.1 V6 AT, PS, PB. I bought it this winter, and after checking it over I noticed that the twin electric fans weren't coming on. Well, it was winter and I don't think they come on until 210 degrees (or something like that) so I didn't worry too much about that, but I thought that they should kick on when I turn the A/C on max, correct? When I turned it to Max A/C, the compressor didn't engage, so I figured the system had a leak and I believe there is a pressure switch on the low side that won't engage the compressor unless there is 5-10 PSI in the system.

Anyways, I didn't worry too much about it, until now. On a whim, (my wife was complaining about it cry) I threw my gauge on it today, and low and behold the system is good on R-12. However, the A/C compressor won't engauge, and now I suspect the fans aren't coming on either. I was stuck in traffic on 494 the other day and I noticed that the temp climbed all the way to 225 and I didn't hear the fans. I checked all of the fuses in the fuse panel, as well as the ones on both the left and right service panels. I also replaced the relays. I have power at the relay plug, and when I bypass the relay it will turn the fans on and it will also engage the A/C compressor. What am I missing? Help! eek

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not uncommon for GM's to wait to turn the fan on until the temp reaches 220-230 degrees. It is important to use a scan tool to see what temps the are actually being read by the car.

What relay did you bypass?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are three relays; two for the fans, and one for the A/C compressor. I checked all three, one at a time of course.

If your wondering about the two sensor problem that commonly occurs on the 3.1 V6, I have replaced the sensor below the thermostat with a 2-wire sensor and compared the gauge reading to the scan tool - they are now within 1 or 2 degrees of one another, so I'm pretty sure the gauge is fairly accurate. I know what your saying about the fan coming on at high temps; the last corvette I worked on didn't come on until 232. Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure 4 will chime in sooner, but I would have to look at the diagram to give you some more pointers. If you bypassed the a/c relay than I would be concerned that the message is not getting to the relay. I'm not sure specifically how it is controlled but I might be suspicious of the control head. I won't be able to take a look until Monday but like I said when 4 sees this he will likely chime in with some specifics for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I have been out all day, and I am on my laptop now, so I will check in the am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would first start by checking to make sure you have power on 2 pins of each relay. Then jump a ground to the primary sides of the relays and see if the stuff works. In other words you want to do the ecm's job of grounding the relays. If it works then, you are down to a ecm input, a wire or a bad ecm.

Here are the diagrams.

coolingfans.jpg

accompressor.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Love the curvature of the antlers.   Beautiful mount!
    • Not a monster for sure but he makes the season a success. I wasnt going to be able to hunt tomorrow because of a first communion, not afternoon today because of my dads birthday, and only evenings Monday&Tuesday.  So time was limited and i am more than happy to eat jake. Here he is.
    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
  • Our Sponsors