Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
gritsnham

Deep Cranks

10 posts in this topic

Just wondering what kind of deep cranks some fmers like to use...i have always liked count down lures for deeper water(25ft plus) but just seeing what others like to use.

Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been a very big DT guy, but after last year, i fished alot of lucky crafts. There a awesome bait. The reason that i say that is becuase of the way the bait is made, and how it moves in the water.

You really need to get out there and try them, i think you would like them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love to deep crank... My deep cranking box is filled with.

Rapala DT16

Norman DD22

Bandit 300

Bandit 400

Poe 400

Poe 400+

Fat Free Shad

Of all of them I use the Poes probably the most, close behind the DT16s....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouuld go with the fat free shad, she can get down to 25 feet in a hurry, also i have actually experimented with some of the new deep diving tail dancers by rapala, and found them to do a good job as well on bass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That new Bandit 700 serious looks pretty sweet. Gonna have to give them a shot. I might even throw the $ down for some of those LCs' this year as well.

As for years past, I used the DTs' most of the time. The fish just like em'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya -

Ahh...what Deitz said. I love deep cranks, especially from mid-July on, and I think Deitz and I could probably trade tackle boxes and not notice the difference. (Although since he fishes tournaments and probably takes things a little more seriously than I tend to, I bet his hooks are sharp...) I really like Poes 400s, DT-16s, and I still have some of the old hand-glued Bandits that I really like, including some of the slow-sinking ones. I've had horrid luck with getting the newer Bandits to tune up and stay tuned. More or less given up on them.

A couple others that aren't on the list are the old classic Fat Rap, Bomber Model As, and Strike King Series 6s.

cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that you guys are talking about trolling depths when you talk about 25 ft - I don't even think David Fritts could do that when casting....20 ft is pushing credibility for casting I think and most folks are lucky to get a solid 15-16 ft.

I can understand it with a sinking lure and lots of patience but the others like DT's, DD-22's etc are either suspending or floating, no?

If you can do it, more power to you and I stand corrected - you must make 100 yd casts with 6 lb test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something really cool about fishing deep water crankbaits. I think most would agree that the feeling of knowing when those bass are going to bite after bumping off the rocks is pretty hard to beat! When it comes to deep cranks (ones that will dig 12-14 feet and deeper) I generally lean towards the DT-16's, Down Deep Rattlin Fat Raps, DD22, I too like the the Fat Free Shads. In my opinion though, the Fat Raps were one of the best cranks on the market, hate to see them phase out like they have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the new braids and deep diving cranks will get you down 22-25 feet, I've bumped bottom a lot in 20 FOW with 10 pound braid. Gotta make real long casts though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Youtube is the way to go. So many cool little self filmed fishing shows on there. Heck I have a channel myself where I record my fishing trips. Uncut angling is cool, I also like Peelindrag because he is out of Michigan like me. Screw those commercial filled, cheesy scripted fishing shows on tv. Times have changed in my opinion.
    • Krylon and Rustoleum both have aerosol primers for plastic.  
    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
  • Our Sponsors