hovermn Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 I have a '74 Johnson 25 hp short shaft on a 14' lund D/W. Speed is around 16-20 mph with 2 people, gear and a deck. This motor is not easy on gas, but it runs pretty decent.How much of a difference would a newer motor have over mine. I think I remember hearing something about older outboards measured hp at the motor, while newer outboards are measured at the prop. Is this right? What year did they switch? I guess I'd be happier with a more fuel efficient motor, a little better speed, and the peace of mind that goes with a newer motor. I was on the St. Croix between Hudson and just North of Stillwater yesterday, 16 miles round trip. I went through about 4 gals of gas. That can't be good, right?Think I'd gain anything from a '90's outboard over the 70's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Stasney Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I had a 70's 18hp Evinrude on my old 14ft boat. I could do about 17-20mph when light, and about 13-16mph when loaded up. If you went 16 miles and used 4 gals of gas compared to what I know mine use to do I'd say that sounds about right and maybe even good. As far as the peace of mind goes well... I used to love my old motor cause the compression checked out good and it always ran. There is a lot of room for opinion there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boatfixer Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 They started to switch from crank shaft to prop shaft rating in 1983. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hovermn Posted May 30, 2008 Author Share Posted May 30, 2008 I guess I really didn't have a basis to go by with the fuel, just thought it was a bit much. I have to be honest, I'm used to flying a hovercraft, which got much better mileage. I know I lost some speed when I put a deck in the boat. The addition of 2 adults, gear, 2 batteries and trolling motors. The boat is weighted down some. Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polarsusd81 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I think you are probably fine with the motor you have, though a newer fuel injected motor or 4 stroke will get better mileage. I have a '76 14' Lund, pretty much the same boat with a flat floor, no deck up front though. I also run a transom mount t-motor and the battery is in the back. I have a 82-83 Mariner 15 horse longshaft. I have clocked with GPS at 31 with just me and gear, 25.5 with two guys and gear, and 17-18 with three guys and gear. My question to you is related to your prop. What do you have for a prop on that motor? I used to have a 12p prop on mine, broke a blade off and decided to replace it with a 10.5p prop. I decided to do that because I could just feel that the motor wasn't working to its full potential. I put that 10.5p prop on and she roars across the lake now. I would guess you probably have a 14p or 15p prop, and stepping down to a 12p or 13p prop might get her going for you. But that is only if the motor isn't revving as high as it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polarsusd81 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I should have added...does the boat pop right up on plane or does it plow a bit before she goes up on plane? When you are in glass calm water how much faster can you go than when you are in a windy/choppy situation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boatfixer Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 Any idea what the 70's 25 hp measures up in HP to a modern engine? Are we talking 2-3 hp, or isn't it a huge difference? Approximately 10% of HP is lost in the gearcase. So yea, about 2 1/2 hp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hovermn Posted June 1, 2008 Author Share Posted June 1, 2008 I can't read the pitch on my prop now, but I've been told it's a power prop, light on the pitch. I've tried 2 props with larger pitch, but it's pretty boggy and gave a great reduction of speed. As far as planing, it doesn't pop right up, but takes a little bit. It also seems to take the motor a while to reach full RPM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hula_Grub Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 I bought an '07 Lund 1425 Classic tiller last year w/ a 25 HP Merc 4 stroke. Heavy boat for the size. Long story short, for performance and safety reasons I went from the factory 9.25" X 12.5" aluminum prop to a 10" X 9" composite prop. I can now get 22 mph (gps) at 95% WOT with the livewell full and my 225 lb rear end, all in the back. It pops up on plane in about 5 to 7 seconds. I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I'd say I burn about 1 gallon per hour. wow, that seems pretty good. At 22mph, that's 22 mpg which would equal almost 150 miles per 6 gallons.I have a larger 14ft with a late 80's 25hp merc. I'd estimate that I can go about 30 miles at WOT per 6 gallon tank. That's with 2 guys/gear/etcI don't think the mileage in the original post is all that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts