Just found this forum. Figured I'd start rifling your archives for some info and ask some questions.
I think I have to replace my X60, so I've begun looking for a new setup.
Fshing that I do is usually confined to depths of less than 20 feet (I'm having a tough time thinking of the last time I was in water even 40 feet deep). Most of my fishing is in rivers and reservoirs. Most are fairly stained (not clear).
I'm hoping to get around problems I had in the past with the X60. Obvious ones were...in high spring water below dams...I had a tough time getting good image of anything but the bottom. Suspended particulate matter and other crud in the current I think pushed the thing to the limit. I had to mess with clarity and everything else to try and remove surface clutter, but I always figured I was removing fish, weeds, etc. To a lesser extent, I think this problem also appears in murky rivers with less current, but that still have lots of suspended crud.
So, now I'm looking.
Old prejudices die hard...but I think Humminbird is out of the picture.
From units I've seen, I'm thinking of a Lowrance x125, a Garmin 250, or Eagle 320 or 480's.
From quickie observation, the 250 had the easiest to read screen (in a store...not in sun), followed by the 480 and then the 125. Aside from that, I don't have much background on these suckers anymore, so my questions:
1) For the depths and type of water I fish, how much wattage is too little or too much. 2) What type of transducer would you guys be looking for (skimmer/puck, cone angle) 3) Any known issues with these units that would make you say "don't bother with this one?" 4) Any units I should consider instead? (I sort of considered the X51, X58, etc...but the menus looked like a pain to deal with) 5) On color units (like a 250C), is the unit's ability to discern fish any better than a tuned b&w with grayscale?
Well, that's enough bugging you for now. Thanks for your help.
[This message has been edited by Carphunter (edited 06-16-2004).]
Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to
not being the anchor person any more). With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely
that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing.
I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the
new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
Dang, new content and now answers.
First, congrats on the new boat!
My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V. 80 might be tops? I’m partial to MinnKota.
How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.
All weather or just nice weather?
Casting a lot or bait dragging?
Bobber or panfish fishing?
Spot lock? Networked with depth finders? What brand of depth finders?
We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha
motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor, wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will
want for this boat? Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke
Mariner motor) I will appreciate any help with these questions.
I went ahead and watched some of the MLF coverage. Wheeler didn’t make the cut but the bigger story was the Poche/Avera fallout.
Kinda funny listening to both sides of the story and putting together the scenario, reading between the lines.
Question
Carphunter
Just found this forum. Figured I'd start rifling your archives for some info and ask some questions.
I think I have to replace my X60, so I've begun looking for a new setup.
Fshing that I do is usually confined to depths of less than 20 feet (I'm having a tough time thinking of the last time I was in water even 40 feet deep). Most of my fishing is in rivers and reservoirs. Most are fairly stained (not clear).
I'm hoping to get around problems I had in the past with the X60. Obvious ones were...in high spring water below dams...I had a tough time getting good image of anything but the bottom. Suspended particulate matter and other crud in the current I think pushed the thing to the limit. I had to mess with clarity and everything else to try and remove surface clutter, but I always figured I was removing fish, weeds, etc. To a lesser extent, I think this problem also appears in murky rivers with less current, but that still have lots of suspended crud.
So, now I'm looking.
Old prejudices die hard...but I think Humminbird is out of the picture.
From units I've seen, I'm thinking of a Lowrance x125, a Garmin 250, or Eagle 320 or 480's.
From quickie observation, the 250 had the easiest to read screen (in a store...not in sun), followed by the 480 and then the 125. Aside from that, I don't have much background on these suckers anymore, so my questions:
1) For the depths and type of water I fish, how much wattage is too little or too much.
2) What type of transducer would you guys be looking for (skimmer/puck, cone angle)
3) Any known issues with these units that would make you say "don't bother with this one?"
4) Any units I should consider instead? (I sort of considered the X51, X58, etc...but the menus looked like a pain to deal with)
5) On color units (like a 250C), is the unit's ability to discern fish any better than a tuned b&w with grayscale?
Well, that's enough bugging you for now. Thanks for your help.
[This message has been edited by Carphunter (edited 06-16-2004).]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts