adam246 Posted April 9, 2004 Share Posted April 9, 2004 Just bought a new Tikka T3 Lite (stainless barrel/synthetic stock)in a .270 Win - I'm getting a scope on it and had a question. I'm definatly going w/ a Bushnell 3200 Elite w/ FireFly reticle in a 3 x 9 - BUT...what's the opinion on the different objective sizes available? I can go w/ 3x9x40mm or the 3x9x50mm. I'm leaning towards the 50mm but A)does it make that much diff. in brightness B)will it fit the rings that came w/ the gun or will I need to buy new ones to get the scope high enough to clear the barrel and C)is it gonna really throw the weight/balance out of whack & be so clumsy as to be not much fun....?!?! BTW - I can order a 3x9x50mm online for $220 - the 3x9x40mm around here is about $230...Mostly deer hunting but want to get into varmint/predator hunting as well in the future... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birddog7mm Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Odds are,that you'll have to go to a little taller ring if you decide on the 3x9-50. If the reason that you're wanting to go to the 50 is for the brightness factor you might consider looking at either the leopold Vari-XIII series or better yet the Leica series of scopes. I own both,ones on a 7mm and the other is on a 35 whelen. I've never had a problem with either scope. The bottom line is that you're paying for the glass. Of the two, I would lean towards the Leica line of products. You would never go wrong with either of them though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts