Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  

A Year in the Life of the White-tailed Deer

Recommended Posts

A Year in the Life of the White-tailed Deer

What times the Rut?

Karl V. Miller

School of Forest Resources

University of Georgia

By the time you read this, the peak of the rut should be pretty much history for most of

the state. However, if you should happen to be hunting in the extreme southwestern

corner of the state, you can still look forward to a rut peaking sometime in mid-


In last month’s issue of GON, Daryl Kirby presented an excellent article on the timing of

the rut. Accompanying the article was a map indicating the timing of the peak of the rut

in various regions. This map provided some invaluable information to help hunters plan

their trips afield depending on where they hunt.

The map also provided some of the clues for a biological riddle that has intrigued

biologists and hunters alike for decades. An astute deer enthusiast certainly would have

noticed that the peak of the rut across the state can vary by as much as 2 months, and

most of this variation is due to the rut occurring progressively later in an east-to-west

direction. This trend continues beyond the state borders, with an earlier rut in coastal

South Carolina, and a progressively later rut through Alabama, Mississippi and into

Louisiana. Interestingly, the rut gets earlier again in east Texas and then progressively

later across the Lone Star state.

The riddle here is ‘Why should the rut vary across the state and the Southeast?’ and

related to that is the question of ‘What then is the mechanism that triggers the rut?’

If you pose these questions to 10 different biologists, you’re likely to receive 10 different

opinions, because we really don’t know the answers. There have been numerous theories

proposed which suggest a variety of influences such as a genetic cue depending on the

stocking source of the deer, the lunar cue dependent on the timing of the full moon, and

the herd age structure and sex ratio. Let’s take a look at these theories based on some

scientific data (but liberally sprinkled with my opinion!).

One thing that we know for certain is that in the temperate regions of North America, the

breeding chronology of whitetails is primarily under the influence of changing

photoperiod. Deer, like a variety of other animals, are short-day breeders. This means

that their breeding season occurs at a time when the length of the day is decreasing.

Inside the deer’s brain is a gland called the pineal gland that secretes a hormone called

melatonin. However, this gland only secretes melatonin under the influence of darkness.

So, as nights grow longer, the portion of the day during which melatonin is secreted

increases. So, it is in this way that deer can keep a ‘chemical clock’ that tracks the

changing seasons. As the duration of melatonin secretion increases, it allows a series of

other physiological changes to occur. Testosterone levels in the buck start to increase

resulting in maturation of the antlers, shedding of velvet, increased aggression, increased

sperm production, and increased interest in the does. Similar things occur in the does,

with increased ovarian activity resulting in changing levels of estrogen and progesterone,

which ultimately culminate with estrus and ovulation.

In the northern portions of the whitetail’s range, timing of reproduction is critical. Fawns

born too early as a result of early breeding would be at risk of a spring storm, or maternal

does may not have had sufficient time to restore body condition in the spring to provide

sufficient care. Similarly, late born fawns may not have sufficient time to grow and

develop sufficient fat stores to allow them to survive their first winter. In addition,

photoperiod changes much more rapidly in more northerly latitudes, allowing the

melatonin clock to time reproduction more precisely.

In southern ranges, the timing of reproduction is less critical, and fawns born early or late

likely would have a greater chance of survival than those born ‘up North’. Photoperiod

also changes more slowly in southern latitudes. Therefore, because seasonal climate

changes are not as severe, fawns born in central Georgia in late May or early June tend to

have about the same survival rates as fawns born in July in portions of Alabama, or even

August in Mississippi.

So, although photoperiod is the overriding factor that ensures that breeding in the South

occurs in the fall or winter, the somewhat forgiving climate in the southern states allows

the timing of the rut to differ among different deer herds. But the questions remain: Why

do different deer herds have different rutting periods across the south? and What triggers

the rut in the different areas?

Probably the most commonly proposed explanation for the differing breeding dates

across the South is that deer herds were restocked in the mid-1900’s with deer of varying

origin, and the current breeding dates reflect the origins of these herds. In other words,

there appears to be a genetic tie that dictates breeding chronology based on where the

deer originally came from.

However, in my opinion, the stocking source theory doesn’t explain all of the trends that

we see, and certainly is not well supported by the data. For example, the origins of the

deer herds in many Piedmont counties (and other parts of the state as well) were

primarily some of the coastal islands including Blackbeard, Ossabaw, and Jekyll. On

these islands, most breeding occurs in late September or early October. However, the

peak breeding in the counties receiving many of these deer usually falls around early or

mid-November. As another example, much of Alabama was restocked with deer

originating from Clarke and surrounding counties in the southwestern portion of the state.

However, the timing of breeding across Alabama can be highly variable. These and other

examples suggest that it is highly unlikely that there is a genetically-tied cue that triggers

when the rut will occur. We’ve been able to further substantiate this in our research

facility where we have been able to successfully change the timing of when does

naturally come in heat, something that couldn’t be done if the timing was based on


The timing of the full moon in September or October also has been suggested as the

triggering mechanism for the rut. Again, this clearly does not fit the data available

because moon phase is the same all across the South, and the timing of the rut is very

different. In a recent study, we looked at the breeding dates of >2,500 does from 7 states

across the United States, and found absolutely no relationship between breeding dates

and moon phase.

In a number of studies across the Southeast, the herd sex ratio and buck age structure has

been implicated as a major influence on the timing of the rut. Very heavy male harvests

with limited doe harvests leads to young male age structure and sex ratio skewed toward

females. In areas where a significant portion of the buck harvest occurs early, sex ratios

may be even more skewed at the time of the rut. These herd conditions can affect the rut

in two possible ways. First, the fewer the bucks to go around, the greater the chances that

a female will not conceive during her first estrous cycle. If that happens, she must wait

through another complete cycle (about 26-28 days) before coming into estrus again.

In addition, we’ve found that simply the presence of mature males can have an effect on

the timing of estrus in females. In a study that we conducted at the Smithsonian

Institution, we found that simply the scent of urine from males can have a stimulating

effect on the reproductive physiology of females.

Nevertheless, although age structure and sex ratio can have an effect on the timing of the

rut on local areas, it still does little to explain why rutting seasons vary broadly across the


Thus far, none of the mechanisms that have been proposed (as discussed above) seem to

provide a plausible explanation of why rutting times differ. Which leads me to my

opinion – deer herds differ in the timing of breeding simply because they can! Let me

explain what I mean. We know that changing photoperiod is the primary triggering

mechanism responsible for timing the breeding season. However, there may be some

small differences in how different deer herds time their reproduction based on

photoperiod. Or, stated differently, deer herds differ in how their ‘reproductive alarm

clock’ is set. Some may go off in response to photoperiod length typical of October,

whereas others may require more hours of darkness (i.e. longer melatonin secretion)

before the alarm goes off. However, the timing of the alarm is not set by genetic cues,

but rather this timing can be physiologically ingrained in the herd, and passed on from

mother to daughter. Studies have demonstrated that there are melatonin receptors in the

developing fetus that respond to melatonin levels in the mother. Therefore, it is possible

that the melatonin cue may be set in a female while still a fetus. Thus a daughter would

be expected to breed at roughly the same time as her mother. In this manner, the timing

of reproduction could be passed from mother through successive generations.

Unlike northern herds, environmental conditions are less likely to weed out those

individuals that breed at a different time. The possibility of winter mortality is not a

significant factor in the Southeast, and therefore does not limit breeding to one specific

optimal time. So, deer in Alabama may breed in December or January simply because

there is no overriding factor such as winter weather that forces them to breed earlier.

And, once this reproductive timing becomes ingrained in the deer herd, there may be little

reason to change. Fawns born earlier or later that the ‘normal’ fawning season may be at

increased risk for predation or other mortality, so the timing persists.

Whatever the reason for the different rutting periods across the Southeast, there likely is

little that we can do to change them. Proper deer herd management may have some

minor impacts on the timing and intensity of the rut. But perhaps the best thing we can

do is to enjoy the diverse breeding seasons and be thankful that there are still a lot of

mysteries about this creature that we don’t yet understand.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Posts

    • Free agency is far from a sure thing, if there are young centers out there (big if) you have to compete with maybe 10 or 20 other teams and pay way over what you should. You have control of nothing and are at the whims of a player everyone is chasing. Same with trades, very easy to swing and miss. By most account we were in on Ryan Johansen with the Preds but Columbus wanted Jones over Brodin and I don't blame them. 
    • Good stuff but time wiill tell. Not buying the "oh we might lose him as a UFA" what, with that kind of money we could buy just as good and younger to give us more of a future...which we desparately need to be thinking about.  Fletch is walking a tightrope and it is going to break IMO.
    • Come on BB, you are better than that. You as much as anyone know that ONE player doesn't make an NHL Team a Stanley Cup contender so why put that blame on him. Sure, a player like Crosby certainly helps, but we aren't talking about the money that Crosby is getting here either. Comparing Koivu's contracts to equivalent players with similar production is quite compelling. He has performed better than many of his peers for his current contract and with the lower AV of his new deal if he continues similar numbers it will be a bargain. I wasn't too happy about the NMC either, but I take that as a bargaining chip so CF didn't have to go with a longer term deal. 2 years is sufficient and I think it works well for both parties. You are right, there are many people out there with more knowledge about the market and what he could have gotten elsewhere and when it may have made sense to sign him, but the fact is you don't want to wait to sign him until after the season for if no other reason at all than to allow him to be a UFA and hear other offers. This will be my last post about the Koivu extension because clearly we don't see eye to eye on whether it made/makes sense, but I assure you there are a large number of "hockey minds" that are in agreement with me on this. Here is some afternoon reading for you:
    • Red admiral i believe.
    • Btw......for you bass purists .... a couple days before the above success, I located mostly largemouth with one smallmouth on the edge of bulrushes adjacent to a deep drop off.  Probably a dozen fish in 20 casts with a Senko. Nothing of any real size. Always fun getting fish on four or five consecutive casts.
    • Great find! I did a little research and did not find an I.D.  Hopefully someone will know what it is.
    • You are 100% correct... a guy has to be smart about it. There is nothing magic about inverters... its takes a lot of DC juice to make a little AC juice. On the flipside though, I have a 120vac 32" TV/DVD player that only draws 51 watts AC.... meaning that it should (hypothetically) only draw 4.25 amps DC. Even with a 15% draw added for the inefficiency of the inverter, I am still under 5 amp. Usually I will run the generator for a few hours between 10 am and 2 pm. Then it is off until 7 pm or so... Then I will fill it up and let it run through out the night. It will run about 9 hrs on eco, so by 4 am or so it is out of gas... but the batteries are topped off nice to run the routine again. The 4 hr run isn't necessary, but does offer some security. With a 5 and a 7 yr old fishing with me the majority of the time, the TV usually doesn't turn off during the day.
    • I believe the crawlers are not natural forage and using them as bait emulates large larvae.  
    • Like I stated earlier and others with more knowledge than anyone on here have as well..we should have waited...I also was unaware of the no trade clause which he was able to get without any less $$...pure stupidity...we'll know in 8/9 months how this pans boot straps us from further improving the team with younger talent is my main issue. As far as a captain, lifelong wild...blah blah blah....if he is such a pillar, such a great player, such a leader of the team...where has he taken us? The playoff record speaks for itself....time to dump guys like Koivu at the soonest opportunity who have done all they can or at least decrease their pay in later years not increase them...they took us as far as they could...and we've already got vets like Parise, Suter, Spurgeon, Granlund, Coyle, Brodin locked in on long term deals; give one of them the C to carry us forward.  
  • Our Sponsors