Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
UdeLakeTom

Area 154 goes lottery

Recommended Posts

There seems to be some concern with some hunters now that hunters know that this permit area will be Lottery for the 2008 season. After five years of either Intensive or Management where hunters could tag more than one deer, it is understandable that this change may not be welcomed by all. So why this change?

First, let's look at some of the history of this permit area and the advent of three types of permit area regulations. Prior to 2003, all permit areas were lottery or perhaps bucks only depending on the population level. With lottery, a certain number of antlerless permits were made available depending upon what we wanted the population to do.

After the severe winters of 1995-96 and 1996-97, permit numbers were restricted for a few years but were gradually increased as populations in the various permit areas increased. We will look at PA 154 from 1999 on as that was the year that we made major changes to permit area boundaries.

Prior to 1999, PA 154 was generally the area south of Hwy 210 and west of Hwy. 47 and encompassed some 174 square miles. It is now some 760 square miles bounded by County Road 3 on the north over to Hwy. 169, south to Hwy. 210, east to Hwy. 65, south to Hwy. 18, and then west to Mille Lacs Lake. These changes were made in an attempt to follow ecological subsections. However, we need to have well defined boundaries such as roads but they do not always follow subsection boundaries. As is the case with PA 154, the north boundary is on County Road 3 because there is nothing south of there to use.

Beginning in 1999, with the new PA 154, 4,563 hunters applied for 1,200 antlerless permits offered and 960 antlerless deer were registered. By 2002, the deer population steadily increased with mild winters and good habitat. That year 6,500 permits were offered but only 5,118 hunters applied. Those permit holders registered 2,863 deer. Clearly the lottery system was not getting the job done by harvesting enough antlerless deer to reduce the population down to goal levels.

In 2003 Managed and Intensive Harvest strategies were added to the Lottery Permit Area designations. This allowed hunters to purchase bonus permits to take up to 2 deer in a Managed Permit Area and up to 5 deer in an Intensive Permit Area. It also meant that all licenses were either sex licenses if a hunter was hunting in a Managed or Intensive Permit Area.

In 2003 the original designation for PA 154 was Managed but then chronic wasting disease was discovered in the elk herd southwest of Aitkin. Due to that, PA 154 was changed from Managed to Intensive so that we would be pro-active in reducing the herd and stopping the spread of CWD if it was found to be in deer. Luckily it was not.

During the 2003 deer season, the antlerless harvest in PA 154 increased 27 percent to 3,646 deer and has been decreasing each year since then and down to 2,617 in the 2007 season. The purpose then for Intensive and Managed designations was to reduce the deer herd down to the population goal for a given Permit Area which we have now reached in PA 154. Actually, according to the population model, we are below the goal that was established through a public process a few years ago. This process established the pre-fawn goal at 17 deer per square mile and the model indicates that the pre-fawn level was 15 deer per square mile this spring. Our recommendation from the field for PA 154 was to go lottery for this fall and make available 3,000 antlerless permits. With 3,000 antlerless permits and if we assume a Winter Severity Index of 100 for this winter the population model predicts a harvest of 1,400 antlerless deer and 1,600 bucks and will stabilize the population.

I'm sure it is hard for some to understand this change when there appears to be a lot of deer out there. As stated, the pre-fawn goal is 17 and the model indicates it is at 15 deer per square mile. That's a pre-fawn number so since June 1, fawns have been born, mortality has occurred (car kills, predator kills, etc.) so right now there could be upwards of 27 deer per square mile. The model indicates that by the opening of the deer season, there should be around an average of 22 deer per square mile (about 5 bucks and 17 antlerless per square mile). Obviously deer are not evenly distributed over the entire area so what you might see now or during the hunting season can be much higher or lower than that.

The model is the best we have to work with. While the numbers may not be what's actually out there, it clearly indicates a downward trend in the population so we need to react to that. Perhaps we could have gone with Managed again (which we did last year instead of Lottery) and then get a severe winter that would really set us back and have severely restricted antlerless permits for several years. PA 154 is therefore lottery this year with 3,000 permits being available. If you hunt PA 154, remember to apply for an antlerless permit by Thu., Sept. 4.

Dave Dickey is DNR Area Wildlife manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • I think we are both kinda right, I'm pretty positive that he saddled up and rode out of Sillytown at that time to never return. But he did come back to the cooking forum, a quick search confirms that. And when in somebodies house, ya gotta play by their rules. You have to adjust, just like in life. I have had the banhammer brought down on me a couple times and  have been a moderator. That takes some talent. lol I've said it before, Sillytown is the only place in my life that I deal with politics. I find it entertaining in the context here. There is not a single political post by me on my Facebook feed. You should lighten up a tad Del, then maybe I and others wouldn't pick on you as much. Enjoy the good eats coming up next week Del. Duff
    • 3k plus or minus a couple hundred depending on engine size I think
    • They are kinda neat.  Id like to see someone try and pull a smaller wheelhouse with one.  Anyone know prices?
    • You heard wrong and he left on his own, multiple times....
    • I have been adding a little equipment to my butchering hobby every year and this year I am going to add a bandsaw to the mix.  On the WWW there are a bunch of them in the 280-450 range that all look like rebranded clones of each other.    Then, from there it looks like the next jump is the Rikon/grizzly model that has bearing guides, a better blade and it looks like a better fit and finish for 650- 800 depending on the retailer. Does anyone have any experience with either of these types or anything similar?  I'm not going to spend the dollars to get a commercial model.     
    • Ya its been a long day. I don't know if I'm a puss or what but I havent even been able to eat today. Never lost a deer before. Hopefully never again. Worst part is I don't know what went wrong I would make exact same shot again.
    • Awesome thank you  
    • Sorry Charlie.  Way I heard it, the lords didn't like him having a plug for his sight in his .sig so he moved on, like many of the cooking folks did to another place.   I am there too, so come on over....  Just leave the politics here.  
    • Gee Dave, you are sure a  believer in the overprotective government.   I bet you cook all your eggs hard, and your chicken to 165.  You need to read up on pasteurization... It's a time and temperature thing. 
  • Our Sponsors