Down to Earth Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Looks like you guys will be facing Kyle Orton come next Monday. Not that it will matter anyways. I see the Vikes pounding away at the Bears for a convincing win. Hopefully my Packers can go into St. Louis and take care of business there as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Down To Earth,Pretty bold statement coming from a team that has yet to beat the Bears this year.....HUMMMMMMMMWindy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratosman Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 bears suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Wow,Witty retort, Strato, I thought that was the saying people were using for the Pack. You had better rack your brain and come up with something original.Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishyguy Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Some just don't get it. The Pack sucks and the Bears blow. There is a difference. Honestly, there is a very good reason the Bears are 9 point dogs but they still have a couple of healthy playmakers on defense, a receiver who can blow past a flat footed corner and Hester who can change a game faster than anyone. The Vikes should win but it would not shock me to see the Bears put up a struggle if they still have some fight left in them after a very difficult year. The Vikes were left for dead a few weeks ago and awoke suddenly. There is no reason the Bears might not do the same just to make a statement that they have some pride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratosman Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Was not a retort merely an observation. Here's another: Bears are execrable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 Quote:Down To Earth,Pretty bold statement coming from a team that has yet to beat the Bears this year.....HUMMMMMMMMWindy Windy,I should clarify as my bold prediction has nothing to do with the first Packer-Bears game. It has more to do with earlier in the season the Vikings went into Soldiers field put up 300+ yards rushing and beat the Bears 34-31 in a game the pretty much controlled the whole time. Only some Brian Griese late game heroics made it that close. Right now the Vikings have won 4 straight games and are playing outstanding football right now. The running game is clicking the defense is solid and the QB play is coming around nicely. Meanwhile the Bears D is no longer feared, they lost their starting RB(granted it was only Benson), and they are down to their #3 QB. I know Orton has a good win loss record, but you and I both know that record had more to do with the Bears D than Kyle Orton. Unless Orton pulls a Chad Hutchinson out from under his helmet, its going to be a long night for the Bears.As for that Packers game, it is unfortunate that that was one of the Packers worse games from a turnover standpoint. We moved the ball for the most part at will and if it weren't for the 5 turnovers we would have won that game. I predict come our visit to Soldiers field we'll have a result closer to our last visit to Soldiers Field rather than the one earlier this season. If your confident enough, I'll make an avatar bet with you. Pack win you front an avatar of my choice for 1 week. Bears win I'll front your avatar pick.Deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 DTEPoints????Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Fishy,I like you man! You "get it". Something that not everybody on the thread can say. Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Strato,Since you "re"plied to me, it would be closer to a "re"tort than an observation. In "re"ply to your "observation" that the Bears "suck", I would ask you, when was the last time the Queens "sucked" in the Super Bowl? The answer for the Bears would be, last year. Second question would be, when was the last year that the Queens won the Super Bowl. The answer for the Bears would be Super Bowl XX.Think about it!!!Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SledNeck Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Playing in the superbowl (and being dismantled by the colts BTW) and being one of the worst teams in the NFL this year makes the bears SUCK even more.Who is the most overrated player in the NFL????I know I know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratosman Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Well thanks for the history lesson...history. I will repay the favor with a lesson in current events. Vikings 7-6 = mediocre and improving quickly Bears 5-8 = sucking and sinking It's time to live in the present, the past is history, and I don't believe in history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 And Sled, When was the last time the Queens were "dismantled" in the Big Dance??? Now we are talking ancient history! LOL At least we got there and at least we won the thing, Queens can not say that. The last time the Queens were at the Dance they were wearing bell bottoms. Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I love this smack talk amongst our division. The Vikes should manhandle the bears, but the bears may not want to loose twice in the same season to a poor Vikings team, as Windy would put it. But if the Bears did loose to the Vikes 2 times in one season, then we would know that the bears do really blow! Just think, the bears lossed to the Vikings, when the Vikings couldnt score against 11 old ladies on a team. And the recievers couldnt catch a cold! Now we are playing all around football. With that being said, this is the Vikings, and I have seen them mess up and loose to worse teams then this bears team, when they were suppose to win. Go Vikes!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaco651 Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 31-17 VIKES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namtkd1 Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I agree. I haven't felt this good with the Vikings in a really long time. With an improved offense and a much better defense, I am thinking SuperBowl baby!Anyone with me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 Quote: Strato, Since you "re"plied to me, it would be closer to a "re"tort than an observation. In "re"ply to your "observation" that the Bears "suck", I would ask you, when was the last time the Queens "sucked" in the Super Bowl? The answer for the Bears would be, last year. Second question would be, when was the last year that the Queens won the Super Bowl. The answer for the Bears would be Super Bowl XX. Think about it!!! Windy WOW!, I always thought it was "backed into a corner Packer fans" who brought out the Super Bowl Trump card. Sounds like Bears fans use as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 Quote:DTEPoints????Windy Yes, I think we've already established that the Bears won the game because they scored more points. But sometimes the score doesn't always reflect what really happened in the game. In this game turnovers played a huge role. Jones had two fumbles in which the Packers were driving in Bears territory and Favre had an interception that gave the Bears a short field. Did you forget the Packers put up 430+ yards on the Bears defense? I don't think the turnovers will be there this game and without them the Bears will not win. Take also into account what has progressed since that first game. The Packers like last years game are playing good football and will have something to play for. The Bears on the other hand, despite it being a different scenerio will have nothing to play for. By the way, you never did give me a response to my avatar bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANDERSO Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Say windy, it's fun to live in the past isn't it?By the way, why dont you go and talk all your interesting viking smack talk on the FISHINGILLINOIS HSOforum cause your alittle out numbered if you want to trade "your mama jokes"!!! So ya but anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Until the Queens take home the hardware both Pack fans and Bears fans can and should use the Super Bowl trump card as often as possible! LOLAnd DTE I did respond to your Avatar challenge, I said, "Points?" Surely a high caliber team like the Packers (who are playoff bound with their potent offense and stingy defense) would love nothing more than to blow out the lowly Bears (who are in dissary with their injury riddled defense and a 3rd string QB) by at least 21 points so if you are feeling strong you should not mind spotting me 3 touchdowns? Bet?Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Strato,Using your theory, wouldn't the Queens and Bears record so far this year also be history? Recent history, but history just the same. I know that Pack fans are considering the loss to the Bears earlier this year as history! Just ax-ing?Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Banderso,Yo mamma is so fat, she got her own zip code!Bring it, Senorita!Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 Quote:Until the Queens take home the hardware both Pack fans and Bears fans can and should use the Super Bowl trump card as often as possible! LOLAnd DTE I did respond to your Avatar challenge, I said, "Points?" Surely a high caliber team like the Packers (who are playoff bound with their potent offense and stingy defense) would love nothing more than to blow out the lowly Bears (who are in dissary with their injury riddled defense and a 3rd string QB) by at least 21 points so if you are feeling strong you should not mind spotting me 3 touchdowns? Bet?Windy My misunderstanding. I thought your points comment was referring back to the final score of the first game. If you need to hide behind a points spread I'll do it. I'll give you the Vegas opening spread, which typically comes out the Tuesday before the weeks game, which I believe is Dec. 18 for the Bears/Packers. I'll post it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANDERSO Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 windy, yo mamma so dumb, she named her kid windy city walleye hunter and thought it would be a great idea to live in illinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windy City Walleye Hunter Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 DTE,I ain't gonna wait for no Vegas spread. Surely you have enough confidence in Brett and the boys to spot me 3 ???Touchdowns, that is!!! LOLCome on DTE, man up and pull the trigger. What's the worst that can happen, you have to look at the lovely Monsters of the Midway logo for a week.Windy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts