MN Shutterbug Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 I've always wondered when the maximum hp is stated for a particular boat, does it make any difference if it's 2 stroke or 4 stroke, especially on an older boat maybe before 4 strokes were around? My question is because of the additional weight of the 4 stroke. Or isn't that a factor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slammer Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Most new 4/stk's are lighter than almost any 2/stk of same horsepower. My 2013 150 4 stk Merc is 10 pounds lighter than the 2001 150 EFI i had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delcecchi Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 I've always wondered when the maximum hp is stated for a particular boat, does it make any difference if it's 2 stroke or 4 stroke, especially on an older boat maybe before 4 strokes were around? My question is because of the additional weight of the 4 stroke. Or isn't that a factor? I don't believe that is a factor. I think there is a formula that they use that comes from the coast guard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Most new 4/stk's are lighter than almost any 2/stk of same horsepower. My 2013 150 4 stk Merc is 10 pounds lighter than the 2001 150 EFI i had. I don't know if this is necessarily true. One must compare apples to apples. Number of cylinders, shaft length, etc. Here's some comparisons I found. Granted, this was found on Evinrude's HSOforum and without knowing the exact models being compared it's nearly impossible to determine if they compared apples to apples. For simplicity I bold typed the 2-strokes in the comparison. Evinrude E-tec 150HP 418Yamaha 4-stroke F150 466Yamaha 2-stroke HPDI 150 468Mercury 4-stroke Verado 150 L4 510Mercury 2-stroke Optimax 150 431Honda 4-stroke150 478Suzuki 4-stroke DF150TX 474 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 I don't believe that is a factor. I think there is a formula that they use that comes from the coast guard. I think I would agree. I'm sure there are a lot of factors that go into the calculation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marine_man Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 I think on "older" boats (pre-mid 1990's?) 4 stroke additional weight didn't factor in much; however, there is no "correction factor" that I'm aware of to offset as well.marine_man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delcecchi Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 I goooogled and found this from the governmenthttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2002-title33-vol2/pdf/CFR-2002-title33-vol2-sec183-43.pdfgood place to start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh.P 86 Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 I don't think two stroke to four stroke will be enough weight to make a difference. Also weight isn't the only factor. The H.P rating is to ensure it is safe to handle as well. I looked into converting my side council 1660 pro v to a tiller and I could only go 67% of max H.P compared to remote steer. It was rated for 100 H.P so I could have only went to 65 horse tiller. Or change the decals.lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.