- 0
-
Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)
-
-
-
Bear can relate too. Tell Leech to start a new account named Leech5, we'll know who he is.If he has any trouble, Bear can walk him through it. -
-
-
-
-
A holiday message leech asked me to pass on. He said he can't seem log on here no more I can relate
-
We put those derned veggies in with our kielbasa. This one was vennie from last year’s mule deer.
-
-
-
Topics
-
Question
Deep_Sinker
Looking for some comments on these two transducer options. Last year, I had a 27c with the 50/200 and loved it. I fish with downriggers quite a bit. The 50 Khz would show the balls and the thermocline pretty easily to 100-140' depths. Question is will the 83 Khz do as good of a job? What could I expect with the 83? Have heard the cone is wider than the 50 and should expect better reading than the 50.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.