• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
DonBo

Public Invited: DNR Elk Mgmt. Meeting

Recommended Posts

Minnesota’s elk management plan will be the focus of two upcoming

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) public meetings.

The plan will address population levels, crop depredation and hunting

season management of wild elk in northwestern Minnesota.

Meetings are scheduled for 7 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, at the

Greenbush-Middle River School gymnasium, 401 Park Ave. in Greenbush, and

7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 5, at DNR headquarters, 500 Lafayette Road, St.

Paul.

Elk are native to Minnesota but likely were nearly extinct from the

state in the early 20th century.

In 1935, the transport of rocky mountain elk, combined with natural

immigration from Manitoba

and possibly North Dakota, have resulted in small elk populations in

Kittson and Marshall counties.

DNR wildlife staff will present parts of the draft plan, facilitate

discussion of issues and answer questions. Comments received will help

complete the draft plan, which will be available for formal comment

before it is finalized.

Copies of the draft plan and comment forms are available online. Copies

also are available at:

DNR headquarters in St. Paul

DNR regional wildlife office, 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N., Bemidji,

218-308-2700

Thief Lake WMA, 42280 240th Ave NE, Middle River, 218-222-3747

Karlstad Area Wildlife Office, 202 Main St. N, Karlstad, 218-436-2427.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question I have been thinking about for awhile. With the thousands of acres of state and federal land in Northern MN why can't they look into tranplanting the herds to these lands? Or keep the herds small in the current areas and start new heards on the government land? Hunters pay alot of money to hunt Elk out west. And with the number of deer hunters in the state you would think there would be alot of interest in increasing the elk hunting opportunities, not to mention the increased revenue for the businesses in those areas and the DNR instead of having them in an area where they are considered a nuisance.

I'm sure there is no simple answer, but would like to know if there has ever been any thought about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PostFrontal, I like your thinking. If the elk are a problem, solve it don't just change it. People pay a lot of money to hunt elk and I'm sure if Minnesota had a larger herd there could be quite a bit of money to be made. If the elk are a problem for farmers they should move the elk and expand the herd to allow for more hunting opportunities. Of course this might not be possible, but I like this idea more than removing the herds entirely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks, The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is involved and is lobbying to get the elk plan changed. They have granted a lot of money to habitat inporvement over the years in NW Minnesota.

If you would like to see the elk flourish, attend these meetings and make your feelings known. In addition consider joining the RMEF and attending a banquet.

Here is my testament to what kind of experiences can be had with Minnesota elk.

http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/ub...Min#Post1518925

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've tried to relocate the Grygla Elk herd East into Beltrami state forest. The elk always move back to the farmer's fields north of Grygla. The thousands of acres of state land in northern minnesota isn't very good elk habitat. If you were an elk, would you pick tromping around in the swamp foraging for food over grazing in a sunflower field?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crappie Killer is correct - elk will go where they want to go. In addition, once cows have a bond with a particular area for calving, they tend to hang there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never hunted Elk, but it has always been something I have wanted to do. I've considered joining the RMEF but since I haven't hunted for them, I didn't really think I would have alot to contribute. So I'm new to the issues with it but read everything I can that I run across about it. So forgive me if my questions seem naive.

Ck-you live in the area, what is feeling of the community up there about the Elk heard? Is it something they want to find a way to make work to improve the hunting and viewing opportunities like Gissert is talking about? I'd assume there could be potentially a large influx of dollars to the area if it was done right. Or is the depradation too out of control that they just want the herd kept small?

If RMEF and the DNR changed the focus of their grant money to habitat management in the State Forests so they could support a new elk herd there would that be possible? And then keep the NW herd small if that is what the community wants?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it's dangerous to speak for other people, since I'm not a politician, but since I've lived here most of my life, I'll tell you what I think.

Some farmers in the elk range have adapted to the elk herd, and put some of their land in CRP or just hayland. But the ones that still plant crops...I think would like to see them disappear somehow. When 40 elk move through a soybean crop, they're more like cattle, not deer. They really can mess things up.

As far as the hunter/tourism thing...sure, come up here and spend a boatload of money! I think the motel's rate is like 35 bucks a night, and sometimes he'll make you breakfast in the morning!

Now, the elk spend a lot of their time on private land, so you'd have to get hooked up with a local. I think most of the property owners in the area would allow you to hunt on their land for elk hunting.

Oh, and the elk reside in the TB zone, just a few miles south of where most of the infected deer have been shot.

This post sounds negative, but I actually like having the elk here, and often take the family out for a drive to see if we can find them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me being an outsider - I'll agree with what CK stated.

When I had my bull tag in 2005, they were hanging 2-3 miles east of where they typically rut. This was unusual, I was told. The key that year was beans. The cows were holed up in some public land (where the DNR would really like them to stay. This area was outside of the hunt boundary. Last September when we went camping, they were where they have traditionally been.

The cows (in 2005) would come out at night and feed in the beans. There were 30-40 acres in one corner that did not have much left. They holed back up well before light, and you just cant call bulls from over a mile away when they have that many cows.

I know there used to be reimbursment for depredation, I dont know how close it came to making things square with the farmers, or if the program exists anymore.

I now personally play the tourism game. We plan on going sometime every year to look at and watch elk. We eat in town, buy fuel, etc. I have really become attached to the area, and will also do grouse hunting trips, and maybe some late season muzzleloading. We dont spend a ton of money, but it is money that is a direct relation to the elk and my great experience. Grygla is a wonderful town.

As far as getting permission, not one landowner denied me. I think permission is a lot in how you ask. I made phone calls well in advance, and came up prior to the hunt to meet and thank them face to face. After the hunt was over, they all got thank you cards, wether I hunted their land or not. If someone shows up a day or two before season and trys to gain permission, then there might be some denials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • big dave 2 and leech, darn good lookin meals!!!!  Dave have a good weekend!!!!
    • Ok Dave have a good weekend. Hope you get over the whole butt hurt Leech deal! Not sure where you got that I don't like folks smoking or grilling things?  I know I do enough. Have fun! 🙂  
    • Heavy rains across northwestern Wisconsin last weekend and early this week have flooded some roads and caused washouts on some highways, roads, state parks, forests and trails. According to the National Weather Service the area has received 7 to 12 inches of rain from Friday through Monday.Several park system property or portions of properties are closed due flooding. Amnicon Falls State Park, closed temporarily but has reopened, though some roads, trails and observation areas remain closed. Pattison State Park is open for camping only; all trails, observation areas, picnic and day-use areas are closed. There are washouts on the dam that forms Interfalls Lake and Highway 35 over the dam is closed. A campground and horse trail are closed at Governor Knowles State Forest and the day use areas along the river at Interstate Park are underwater.Water was roaring over Little Manitou Falls at Pattison State Park.Photo credit: Gervase ThompsonAll rivers in the region are running extremely high. The falls at both Amnicon and Pattison are roaring, but road closures mean observing the falls now is challenging. The Bois Brule and Flambeau rivers are high enough that some canoe launches and campsites are underwater. The water is making its way downstream and the Lower Wisconsin River is running very high with all sandbars submerged and canoeing and kayaking not recommended. The river is expected to crest Muscoda this weekend at 40,000 cubic feet per second. .
    • I'm still going to smoke this fatty while camping this weekend whether Leech likes it or not.....😋       See you fellers on Monday........
    • Rick didn't like all the "My Grills bigger and better then yours" posts!  😅
    • We switched to a new server. Had a glitch in our dB that lost a couple days of posts.
    • I ripped a hole in one of my favorite pairs of fishing shorts just need a decent sized patch to cover her up
    • I am not sure what happened either but we lost all of the posts last couple days not just this thread. And it looks like the same thing happened over on FM site as well. I know the site was down last night while I tried look at it.
    • We had no problems but only brought 10 extra gallons over.  We fished 5 days, pretty much running wherever we wanted and ended with 7 gallons remaining in the boat.  So, we burned 30 gallons of fuel in a 1785 Lund with 90 hp Mercury 4 stroke.   I thought that was pretty good!
    • Seems to me that we are missing an entire page from this thread that was here yesterday.... what gives?