• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Craigums

Gamma Line Color

Recommended Posts

Really this question applys to any brand fishing line. I was looking at some 4lb Gamma ESP ice for my panfishing rod and noticed you can order in clear or blue. What would be the pros and cons of each color? Does it really matter which you use? is the blue more or less visible to the fish?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lately, I've been staying away from the clear lines cause I find them too hard to see out on the ice. Have not seen the Gamma blue, but if it like Trilene's blue line, then that would be the way to go for me IMO.

I've used trilene's blue ice line and haven't noticed it hindering my catching success. Even if a colored was a concern, I could always tie on a floro leader.

Also used Cajun Red - again, much easier to see on the ice for me, didn't notice the fish having an problem biting on it.

Go colored, and tie on a clear leader if you feel necessary. I do this with my swivel rigs (for swim lures), tie main line (colored/braid/fireline) to swivel, then use a clear florocarbon leader & usually around 18+" long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colored lines are less likey to get stained. Then again I change my lines partially based on how stained it gets. It indicates how much I've used it.

Besides it also helps to keep track of which lines are which test# if you go with different colors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The blue is easier for you to see, and thus probably easier for the fish to see.. If you are a line watcher,(if you watch your line for bites) get the blue. If you are more about stealth, get the clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I like the colored line, not so much to line watch (cause I depend on feel or the spring bobber for bite detection) - I like it more for ease of tieing knotts out on the ice, can be tough to see clear line in poor light conditions with the snow/ice as background.

Also, with some of really light jigs, you have to feed line out by hand to get it down to depth more quickly (jig not enought weight to draw out line on its owne). When feeding the line it is VERY helpful to have line you can see so you can tell if it is going down the hole or just bunching up on top of the hole or around it.

You can use a clear leader to help with stealth at the jure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a higher vis line is not a concern to you ,stay with the clear. Gamma ESP Polar Ice is very low vis and good as is, no need for a Fluorocarbon leader.

If you line watch, or need a more user viewable friendly line color to manage your line, than blue is very handy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The blue is easier for you to see, and thus probably easier for the fish to see..

Generally agree. Blue is on the high end of the color spectrum and is affected very little by water. The visible color spectrum of fish still needs to be determined by science.

I would leave the blue line on the store shelf based on the science we know today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • big dave 2 and leech, darn good lookin meals!!!!  Dave have a good weekend!!!!
    • Ok Dave have a good weekend. Hope you get over the whole butt hurt Leech deal! Not sure where you got that I don't like folks smoking or grilling things?  I know I do enough. Have fun! 🙂  
    • Heavy rains across northwestern Wisconsin last weekend and early this week have flooded some roads and caused washouts on some highways, roads, state parks, forests and trails. According to the National Weather Service the area has received 7 to 12 inches of rain from Friday through Monday.Several park system property or portions of properties are closed due flooding. Amnicon Falls State Park, closed temporarily but has reopened, though some roads, trails and observation areas remain closed. Pattison State Park is open for camping only; all trails, observation areas, picnic and day-use areas are closed. There are washouts on the dam that forms Interfalls Lake and Highway 35 over the dam is closed. A campground and horse trail are closed at Governor Knowles State Forest and the day use areas along the river at Interstate Park are underwater.Water was roaring over Little Manitou Falls at Pattison State Park.Photo credit: Gervase ThompsonAll rivers in the region are running extremely high. The falls at both Amnicon and Pattison are roaring, but road closures mean observing the falls now is challenging. The Bois Brule and Flambeau rivers are high enough that some canoe launches and campsites are underwater. The water is making its way downstream and the Lower Wisconsin River is running very high with all sandbars submerged and canoeing and kayaking not recommended. The river is expected to crest Muscoda this weekend at 40,000 cubic feet per second. .
    • I'm still going to smoke this fatty while camping this weekend whether Leech likes it or not.....😋       See you fellers on Monday........
    • Rick didn't like all the "My Grills bigger and better then yours" posts!  😅
    • We switched to a new server. Had a glitch in our dB that lost a couple days of posts.
    • I ripped a hole in one of my favorite pairs of fishing shorts just need a decent sized patch to cover her up
    • I am not sure what happened either but we lost all of the posts last couple days not just this thread. And it looks like the same thing happened over on FM site as well. I know the site was down last night while I tried look at it.
    • We had no problems but only brought 10 extra gallons over.  We fished 5 days, pretty much running wherever we wanted and ended with 7 gallons remaining in the boat.  So, we burned 30 gallons of fuel in a 1785 Lund with 90 hp Mercury 4 stroke.   I thought that was pretty good!
    • Seems to me that we are missing an entire page from this thread that was here yesterday.... what gives?