wanger29 Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 Caught this in a spot which has neither. Shoot me your thoughts on what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loos15 Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 wow coool. looks like baby ski... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DHanson Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 It's too young to know for sure. Pike can look like muskies when they are in the fingerling stage and vice versa. I know it looks like a muskie, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess pike, just because pike are in just about every pond or lake that has any fish existence whatsoever, and muskies, well, they are a rarity as far as how many lakes and rivers they live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolas hanson Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 Thats a muskie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanger29 Posted October 3, 2008 Author Share Posted October 3, 2008 I wish I had a better camera. The coloring was that of a young ski. But yeah, pretty young fish. I stated in another report how it was too small and jumpy to count or see spores Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b1gf1sh1 Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 thicker dark markings, thinner light markings = esox luciusthinner dark markings, thicker light markings = esox masquinogy or esox masqui-luciusyou be the judge. ... also a pure muskie fingerling has a cream colored stripe on the back, and from what i know a tiger may or may not have one and be dark olive green on the back like a pike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esox_Magnum Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 Hard to tell when their that small but looks like a tiger. Catch it in a few more years and we'll know for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRedig Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 I'd guess a pure or tiger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodmaker Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 Looks like a 'ski to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoxMN Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 I sent a pic that looked just like that to the DNR to ask if I had a muskie in my little lake, and he answered that it was a pike, that they look just like that when small. There is a bar on the back, top, and I can't recall if it has the bar if its a pike or ski, but that was the main thing he said is the difference. I wish I still had the pic, but can't find it. Cool little guy either way though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dano_the_jigasaurus Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 the only way to actually tell the difference between the two that young is to check the jaw pores on the underside, pike will have 10 or less pores and a musky will typically have 15-18 pores (but can range (12-20)). tight lines dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b1gf1sh1 Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 heres a pic of a muskie fingerling, note the wider light, thinner dark lines. can't see the top but theres a cream colored stripe on top. based on the pictures above, i see a dark olive green top, that is a northern pike. of course i'm assumeing it was caught here and not out east. i don't know jack about pickerel fingerlings. on a side note, i got a couple nice pike and about a 41-42 inch muskie this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b1gf1sh1 Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 i did a little more searching and found these. pretty different really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Kuhn Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 It's a pike. The size of the spots on a northern stay pretty much the same their whole lives. When they are that small, they tend to be vertical and start to stretch out horizontally as the fish gets bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippman Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 I agree about it being a pike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkeezerLeo Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 yes, small pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanger29 Posted October 5, 2008 Author Share Posted October 5, 2008 Cool! Very interesting info, thanx for looking that up for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrklean Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 im gonna have to agree after seeing those other pics its a pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts