Jump to content

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. 😀

Playoffs anyone??

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Since being convinced by Big Dave that the only fair way to select the Super Bowl teams is through a 13 person committee, it seems silly to have all these playoff games. Until other major sports catch up to the FBS process, I'll choose...

Arizona, Pittsburgh, Indianapolis & Detroit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Games were OK to watch. I thought the two late games were much better each day. Glad to see Dallas gets the game handed to them by the stripes. Pretty bogus to announce the penalty and then pick the flag up.

Couple thoughts.

1. The Bengals should fire Marvin Lewis tonight

2. Dez Bryant is a pie stain

3. Cam Newton is the my most hated player in the league. I love how he does the Jared Allen and fakes the phantom injury and pretends every motion hurts, and then once its apparent the game is over he is running up and down the sideline like there's nothing wrong. What a fraud!! Not to mention he sucks as a QB.

4. Never bet against Baltimore in the playoffs

5. We need to get a real disruptive DE across from E Griffen

6. Larry Fitzgerald is on his way to the Vikings

7. Andrew Luck will eventually win a Superbowl

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would of been easier for the Cowboy defender to turn his head if Pettigrew let go of his face mask ....Lions suck. They need to find a coach that has a pair or find a punter who can kick more then 10 yards when the pressure is on if they want to get anywhere.

Clam Newton is a turd bucket, that's why I picked against them. That game was a 50/50 flip a coin pick IMO.

It would be sweet to get Fitz....8 yrs ago. They can keep him and his MONSTER contract. We already have 1 overpaid vet as our #1 we don't need another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but I'll be pulling for the Packers over JJ's Boy's.I still think the road to the SB(NFC) runs thru Seattle & in the AFC it's still hard for me to go against Brady/Belicheck.I have to agree with FOF that neither NFC game will be close IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me

Balt over NE

Seattle over Carolina

GB over Dallas

Denver over Colts

I cant bet against the Ravens anymore. Everytime I do in the playoffs the kick my butt. They have had good success playing @ NE in the playoffs.

Seattle simply too much and Scam Newton is a terrible QB/ human being

GB offense should be able to overpower Dallas D and Demarco Murray gonna put a cold ball onto the ground.

Dont think the NFL is ready for Luck to beat Manning yet. However, Manning is kind of a choker in the playoffs, but he reserves it for a later game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there will be any major upsets unless you think the Colts over the Broncos is major... I have:

IND over DEN

GB over DAL

SEA over CAR

NE over BAL

Ditto. Homo and the girls get blown out as does Carolina. New England wins it at the end and the colts win in OT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking there has to be one home team that will lose. Would love to see it be Seattle but thinking it's going to be the packers that are the one home team to lose this weekend. Just can't see them stopping the run game enough and would not be surprised if Bryant has a huge game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • They sound like my wife DonBo.  In the spring she can't understand why i go off to hunt when she just looks out the window and there they are. Good luck.  
    • About 20 years ago my homewaters "Wisconsin Driftless" were teaming with brook trout.  If you fished hard for an entire day you could land over 150 brook trout. Not all of them were tiny.  Back in the good old days I averaged 100 brook trout a morning.  My go to lure was a size six Panther Martin Fly Pattern. Gold body and blade with an orange tail with a tuft of black in the tail.  About 15 years ago that changed.  The numbers turn a dramatic turn downward.   This event seems like a dejavu happening from 50 years ago.  I remember anglers scratching their heads back then and trying to figure it out.  Back then the Wisconsin Department Of Natural Resources was a tiny department and had many fewer staff.  The drop in the brook trout population was attributed to over harvest back then.   Fast forward to 15 years ago.  The same event happened and with angler reporting and science leading the way the Wisconsin Department Of Natural Resources figured out the reason for the crazy drop in the brook trout population.   Science tells us that over harvest 50 years ago was "not" the problem. The DNR has been studying the problems.  Yes I said "Problems". It is three fold.  The brook trout are being pushed out of their historical waters by brown trout.  The brown trout are bigger and with the waters warming in my area the browns are comfortable with the waters the brook trout call home.  A brook trout typically likes colder water and browns don't.  The DNR even shocked out browns from waterways and removed them.  They have put up barriers to try to keep out the browns so the brook trout can flourish again.   The third and worst problem for brook trout are "Gill Lice".  They are a parasite  that attaches to the brook trout's gills and compromises their breathing. Browns do not have problems with gill lice. The once prolific brook trout streams of the driftless are now almost devoid of brook trout. The DNR has done much research and tried many things to solve the problem.   The DNR has attached a scrub brush to every stream exit site so you can clean off your boots to avoid cross contamination of streams. The DNR has a liquid solution it tried. They dipped the trout in the liquid to remove the gill lice.  It worked but the trout were re-infected shortly thereafter in the stream.  The stream could not be treated.   Many streams in my home water have no kill regulation for brook trout and a bigger harvest limit for browns. The DNR even stocked different strains of brook trout right on top of infected brook trout.  They were looking for a strain that was more resilient against gill lice.  Nothing seemed to work.    This season I fished one of my more prolific brook trout streams from the past.  As I fished I pondered and tried to figure out how this could have possibly happened.  I caught zero brook trout on the stretch.   As I drove home I compared 50 years ago and now.  The best indicator of the future is the past.  I have no specialized training but here is what 58 years of trout fishing caused me to deduce. The brookies had the gill lice 50 years ago too and they were decimated and they then cycled out. They were not around for the parasites to attach to so gill lice numbers dropped also.  The brook trout took a hiatus and cycled back 20 years ago.  The brook trout will return.  They will cycle back.   A month ago I fished my former favorite brook trout stream.  I was targeting browns.  I was going to harvest some.  I was going to try and do my part to try and bring back the brook trout.  I fished a short stretch and was astounded at the extra large male brook trout I caught.  It was gill lice free.  I contacted the fisheries staff to check if they had stocked big brooder brook trout in the stream and they had not.  I was quite encouraged because of the huge male brookie and zero gill ice.  I returned two weeks later and caught my personal best brook trout.  She was gill lice free. My fingers are crossed and I hope nature has reset itself and my brook trout come back with a vengeance. 
    • good to see your pic's again!!!  
    • i'd do it for beer!!!!!!!!!👍😂
    • It would only affect people who get paid for doing the processing.
    • They don't need data!!🤗 Just a way to collect more feed.😂   I personally believe it is B.S.
    • wife hikes a lot and drags me along often....really weird being close to water without a rod in my hand.
    • Wife and I pointed the Jeep northward and saw sights.
    • Vikes are garbage. I swore them off prior to this season after they did nothing in the draft/off season to address the O-Line, then they doubled down on poor decisions by re-upping Speilman's and Cousin's contracts.    I hope they don't win another game all season and then they blow the whole thing up. I like Zim, but it doesn't seem like he's a good HC.    Sunday's are more enjoyable without the Purple Face Palm. 
  • Topics

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.