Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Do you run chains on your front tires?


slick2526

Recommended Posts

I think it would really depend if you intend on pulling a lot. If you do then on all 4 would be important, but if you are mainly using it to get through snow with a small portable in two behind, then I think you are ok with just the rear. Most of the time its clearance issues that you run into with the depth of the snow before you run out of traction.

I personally dont even run chains. I pull an otter lodge fishhouse behind my Arctic Cat and only been stuck once where I needed assistance. The other times I am able to jockey it back and forth to get it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I run chains on the rear and my front tires are studded. I have no issues pulling the portable and the wheel house but I watch out and avoid big drifts when pulling the big house. Reason I studded the front tires it was hard to turn on ice with very little snow but now with the studs, the front tires turn very well, no pushing trying to turn or corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't own one of these things but I have to ask, since it seems like several folks do two only -- why would you run only two? Just the hassle of putting all 4 on? Or is it the cost of the additional 2 chains? Or do the front chains degrade performance somehow (other than traction)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manufacturers recommend not using chains on the front due to excessive wear on the front diff. My argument has always been if the machine is 4x4, how is it any different than spinning the tires and the front suddenly gains traction coming out of some mud or putting the front under load or stress while in 4x4?

Not that I'm discrediting what the mfgr's are saying. I just don't think it's as bad as they claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manufacturers recommend not using chains on the front due to excessive wear on the front diff. My argument has always been if the machine is 4x4, how is it any different than spinning the tires and the front suddenly gains traction coming out of some mud or putting the front under load or stress while in 4x4?

Not that I'm discrediting what the mfgr's are saying. I just don't think it's as bad as they claim.

Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation. Seems like it could hold some merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up V-bar chains for my 1999 Spotrsman 500. I had to return the set for the front tires. Not enuf clearance the chain would hit left front steering arm. Rear set fit good and plowed driveway at cabin for the first time this year with over 12" of snow on the ground. What a difference rear chains make! If I could only have chains on the front that machine would go through anything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I run studded diamond pattern on the rears and two link v bars on the fronts. Any quad with a macpherson strut type of suspension will have issues with chain clearance in the front. I believe polaris is the main user of this suspension geometry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.