Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Reinstating a 5 year moratorium on wolf hunting


bd477

Recommended Posts

SF 666 Reinstating a 5 year moratorium on wolf hunting

Scheduled to be heard on Thursday, March 14

12 Noon

Room 107 Capitol

Committee on Environment and Energy

Chair: Sen. John Marty

1.1A bill for an act

1.2relating to natural resources; reinstating the five-year moratorium on wolf

1.3hunting;amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 97B.645, subdivision 9.

1.4BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

1.5 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 97B.645, subdivision 9, is amended to read:

1.6 Subd. 9. Open season; moratorium. Beginning June 30, 2013, there shall be

1.7 no open season for wolves

1.8 for a five-year period. After that time, the commissioner may

1.9prescribe open seasons and restrictions for taking wolves but only if population

1.10

management is deemed necessary and other means for controlling the wolf population are

1.11 explored. The commissioner must provide opportunity for public comment.

Bill:

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.ph...;version=latest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This could effectively end the wolf hunt for the foreseeable future and open the door for more lawsuits should they decide to try to reinstate a wolf hunt 5 years from now. Contact your representatives and let them know what you think!!!!

District Finder

Tell them it's the DNRs job to manage the wildlife in this state and not the legislatures!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SF 666 They are Devils I tell you! eek

No Wiser is right...put as much pressure as we can on our representatives to vote no on this bill at all levels and make sure it does not get added into any of the final omnibus bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But doesnt the city folk know what is best for everyone up north? Since they go up there a few times a year, to their 7500 sq ft cabin on weekends. They want to see these cool wolves in the wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, then maybe we should create a department, that is designed to look over the wildlife. Create seasons, and figure out what is best for the wild. Maybe they can name it something like Department of Natural Resources, or something like that. But I guess a bunch of tree hugging non working spoiled city kids know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks be477 and No Wiser for the heads up and reminder to contact your reps. Here is the response I received from my email to vote no on SF 666, from my rep Dave Osmek.

"Thanks for the message. You are absolutely correct and I support your position. 'Hunting is Conservation' is a three word phrase that encapsulates the whole matter. The DNR has already said that we do not need the moratorium.

We will hear the bill tomorrow or Friday in committee and I will do everything I can to not let it pass to the Senate Floor"

I hope others feel the same way but make your voice heard as No Wiser suggested. Follow the link and send them an email.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, then maybe we should create a department, that is designed to look over the wildlife. Create seasons, and figure out what is best for the wild. Maybe they can name it something like Department of Natural Resources, or something like that. But I guess a bunch of tree hugging non working spoiled city kids know better.

Hey I'm all for the DNR managing it too.

I'm thinking tree hugging spoiled city kids are probably about as bad as country folks that have the same no clue except from the other end of the rainbow. My point is I doubt that living up north in wolf country suddenly gives someone an expert opinion on population ecology, yet without fail, somebody starts talking about city folks vs. country folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it is in "their" backyard wink

How would you feel if those country folks decided it is best for the metro to go all back to gravel roads, and started to fight for it in the legislation? Since all that pavement, and concrete doesnt allow the aquifers to re establish, and absorb water. Would you not think they are trying to put their noses in where they dont belong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you feel if those country folks decided it is best for the metro to go all back to gravel roads, and started to fight for it in the legislation? Since all that pavement, and concrete doesnt allow the aquifers to re establish, and absorb water. Would you not think they are trying to put their noses in where they dont belong?

I'd probably argue against the idea based on the cons of such a proposal, rather than attempt to discredit those that came up with at as clueless rednecks with no job wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really think we have alot to worry about on this one in reality...with no support from the DNR, or the other side of the isle...I think it will really just die in commitee, and if it does somehow get through the senate, it will never pass the house...but then this is just another way of avoiding talking about the issues that the legislators should really be concentrating on like cutting spending, lowering our taxes, coming up with a balanced budget, and building a new casino to fund the Vikings stadium. grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And putting the screws to daycares that fraudulently bill the state for kids that don't show up. Several million of all of our dollars are wasted that way every year. If the state could hone in on where it's all wasted we'd be in such better shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, don't let them overpopulate to the point where they can't find food...this is already the case in some area's, I talked with a DNR trapper last fall and he said all the wolves they were catching were only at the 60 perctile in weight where they should normaly be for that time of year...(Mid Sept.)...and don't let the population get so high that they are wiped out by mange like so much of the fox population did when fur prices tumbled....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I concur with all said, hunting them will only help and strengthen them. I'll be curious to see in the farmland area where my uncles are at in Ottertail County, federal trapper took over 2 dozen in that area, hunters got some, trappers got a few, to see what the deal is now, Easter will be a good chance to get the report. Like it or not Peta, they will be guns loaded at the ready during this calving season which just began with calf # 1 today. Do they want to have a wolf conflict with their cattle no, will they defend their herd, in a heartbeat. Last Spring with plenty around they had 0 problems, but they are worried with all this ice and poor footing for the cattle, they've lost some do to slipping and breaking their hip(s) so each cow/calf right now means a lot to them and they had to relocate some cattle because of ice etc. and it's not nearly as close to the house. Maybe they do but why doesn't peta stand up for the moose situation ? Is it because they fear wolves are exascerbating(sp) the problem ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.