Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. 😀

  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

B-man715

Why is it Illegal to dump Fish Guts?

Recommended Posts

Not trying to start an arguement, but does anybody know why you can't dump your fish guts into the lake??

I know this law has been on the books as long as I can remember (both in Wisconsin and Minnesota). And I abide by this law.

Seems like a waste of fish food wink

I guess I could imagine what a boat landing would look and smell like in August if everybody cleaned fish there........but what would be wrong with ice fisherman throwing some guts down a hole for the lake to recycle.

Nothing goes to waste in nature....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I could imagine what a boat landing would look and smell like in August if everybody cleaned fish there........but what would be wrong with ice fisherman throwing some guts down a hole for the lake to recycle.

Nothing goes to waste in nature....

This right here is prolly why. Could you imagine if everyone cleaned there fish at the landing. Not only would it absolutely smell but would also bring all kinds of critters to the guts. I have cleaned fish at the lake before doing a shore lunch on an island and dumped back into lake but that's usually on a camping trip or something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the sleeper house example, it is so you have proof of fish consumed during that day so the DNR can enfore daily limits and you can't just dump guts and keep another limit.

Other than that, i suppose it could get pretty ugly in some of shanty towns with everyone dumping guts down the hole.

Ecological wise, i dont see anything wrong with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Alaska we throw everything back into the River, granted that is moving and flushes into the ocean. However I do snag a dead carcass here and there, which is annoying.... It is tougher to reel in with the current than an actual live fish.

Where we launch for the deep sea fishing they have cleaning stations everywhere and animal proof waste bins. Works nice. Oceans and Rivers are large moving bodies of water and the waste doesn't just sit there.

I could see it becoming a real mess at the lake, especially a small lake. Unless they had those bins and cleaning stations with running water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TruthWalleyes -

What if you were to just gut the fish? Still have the whole fish minus the guts.

Most of the big landings on Michigan have grinders, not sure where it goes after that though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stray cat that lives under my deck would be VERY unhappy if I threw away her precious fish guts..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stray cat that lives under my deck would be VERY unhappy if I threw away her precious fish guts..

Ricky let you put a deck on your toolshed? That's 100% [PoorWordUsage]!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well nobody really answred the question??

i wonder that to i think old fish just die on the bottom dont they

i cant see it as polluting te lake must be a reason though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ricky let you put a deck on your toolshed? That's 100% shat-astic!

HA! He had a good month selling shopping carts and had the extra cash to add on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one trip in the BWCA the rangers said to leave fish guts etc on rocks so the gull would eat them. They said to not dump them in the water cause with the cold water they don't decompose very fast or at all. I guess it could also create too many nutrients but that's just my theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing it has to do with the volume of guts that would be laying around. One guy throwing ten panfish carcasses down the hole probably isn't a big deal. 100 guys doing it starts to be a big deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fivebucks, that makes sense to me. If the bacteria can't break down the carcases until water warms in the spring, you could get a bloom of bacteria. The ammonia levels might also get too high, which in fish tanks will poison and kill your fish pretty quickly. In a smaller lake I could see those things being a problem for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TruthWalleyes -

What if you were to just gut the fish? Still have the whole fish minus the guts.

Most of the big landings on Michigan have grinders, not sure where it goes after that though.

In the summer, throw them in a cooler to keep chilled, or livewell to keep alive. . Removing the guts and leaving them in a hot boat probably isn't helping much anyway.

In the winter, a bucket with snow/water works great. I'm not a fan of thawing fish to clean them...just won't do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Granted, it was in the summer, but when we stopped for shore lunch on LOTW on the Canadian side, the guides threw the fish carcases in the water. By the time we finished lunch the crayfish had the skeletons picked clean. I would thing about the same thing would happen in the winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a funny thread,,, I've spent quite a little time fishing down

south and throwing fish guts in the lake is common practice believe it

or not. Most resorts have a fish cleaning station on the end of the dock.

First time I saw it done I was quite surprised, then the guide asked what

do you do withem up north? I told him we had to "dispose" of them, he just

shook his head and said "dang fool Yankees" grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

did the same thing down on Table Rock Reseviour. running water, cleaning table, hose and you just shoved the heads guts and skin down a little slide right in the water off the dock. lots of turtles in the area [and water moccasins]. good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HA! He had a good month selling shopping carts and had the extra cash to add on.

Plus the creaky boards will help alert him to any samsquanch visits....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I fished Cordova, AK some time ago, there was a fish cleaning station on the shore out to sea. A ramp with a spout at the top to get some water flowing flushed carcasses/guts to the ocean.

One day there were some harbor seals and a sea lion at the base of the slide, chowing on fish guts while we were disposing of our non-edible salmon parts. It was kinda cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think if we all started dieing and decomposing werever we died im talking about 10 ppl dead for every one person now think how smelly and dirty life would be and how diseases can spread cause of so many carcasses laying around. Thats what i pictured when i read this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't the exact rationale as to why Minnesota and Wisconsin have laws against this, but I can guess pretty well as to what happens scientifically (i.e., science and law often have, shall we say, a "curious" relationship).

When fish guts are thrown into a lake, they will decompose, which will consume oxygen and release ammonia (ammonia is toxic to fish). This similar to what would happen if a fish died in your aquarium at home. In the summer, this shouldn't be a huge problem (in the sense of "the solution to pollution is dilution"), unless a lot of people are doing it (which is probably why it's no problem to do this in Alaska).

Ecologically, it could cause some strange/undesirable things to happen. The last time that I went camping in the BWCAW, I was told to bury my fish guts because they attracted gulls, which were out-competing loons.

I would imagine that if everyone did this all winter, then it would create a major STINK in the spring at ice-out time. It would also attract a lot of flies, undesirable rodents (rats!), and birds (rats with wings!). These are all known to spread disease, which is a bad thing too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • I'm OK with the replay if it's used for a challenge.  The automatic review is pretty lame though.   And I agree with Dave about the playcall.  If he would have thrown to an open receiver nobody would have said it was an awful call.  Cousins effed that up.
    • I have an terrova with Ipilot, (not link),   I lay the trolling motor in the bottom of the boat which is stored in covered storage.  It has been fine for several years.   Gets darn cold up around Cook.   No problem.  On the other hand I bring my depth finders and transducer home and store above freezing due to bad experiences with Lowrance transducers in previous years and ambiguity in documents about my elite 7s I have two  
    • ^^^^^^^^   1. zimmerman and stefanski should be fired, cousins benched. (or released)   2. the review by the "experts" in NY has destroyed any legitimacy this sport may have had.   Should note cousins contract. speilman got played. (he should go too)    
    • Ive never really been a fan of replay.  I think we've all seen cases where the refs still screwed it up after replay so we're trading one bad call for another.  Its interesting to hear the rules guy they have commenting on the broadcasts.  They always give their opinions on how they see the play and whether it should be overturned or not.  Yesterday there were 2 reviews that they disagreed with how the officials called the play after review which shows how its all still subjective.    You can look at every single play during a game and probably find something to call on both teams if you look hard enough which I think is a case of what happened during Diggs touchdown that was called back.  Cook either ran into the defender or intentionally tried to block him.  I'm not sure its 100% clear either way and isn't the benchmark supposed to be "clear and indisputable"?  Unfortunately now that replay is a thing pandora is out of its box and I don't think it can ever be put back in.  
    • 1. I think the play call was fine, Cousins just F'ed it up. Play action on first down after you have been running up and down the field on a team is pretty standard but throwing into triple coverage on a play like that is not.   2. Anyone who has ever advocated for instant replay review in sports is now getting what they deserve in my opinion. I could have told you that there would be a natural progression that would lead to this point and beyond. I say get rid of replay review in it's entirety and live and die by what referees call on the field. I was told at the beginning stages of replay that the reason was "so we get the calls right". If that is really the reason, you should be happy they got it right. 
    • Only 2 comments on the game.    1. What a lousy throw by Cousins in the endzone and what a lousy play call.  They were running the ball right down the Packers throats, why would you not keep running it.  2. I think I hate the new PI replay.  To take a touchdown off the board because they noticed someone maybe sorta blocking when they reviewed the scoring play is kind of a joke.  The PI wasn't called on the field and no one challenged it.  When you're reviewing the scoring play it seems like you should only be reviewing if the player got the ball across the line without losing control.  Pretty soon they'll be reviewing every lineman to make sure they weren't holding on the play as well and that none of them moved a thousandth of a second before the snap.  If that happens I hope they also review every defensive player to make sure they didn't move early, hold, or engage a receiver after 5 yards.  It really feels like we've gone too far with this replay thing and they're using it as a answer to everything when sometime you're just exchanging one bad call for another.    I think thats all I've got besides the fact that I haven't been real impressed with the NFC north so far.  The Packers and Vikings look average to decent but hardly superbowl contenders.  The Bears squeaked out a win but they are looking like they don't have much to work with at QB.  And the Lions as usual aren't worth talking about.  
    • The roof is finally on and I got some of the wiring started.  The tin came in over the weekend so I was able to pick that up last night.  I will start to put that up this week if the weather permits.
    • This is where:   Big Dave2 HSO Legacy Member Don't know much about football, huh?   😁   Doesn't matter if we have a good QB. We're a running team! 🙄
    • I hope they draft a good QB next year. That was a shiatty play call on first and goal to begin with. Pack aren't that impressive, neither are the Vikes.
×
×
  • Create New...