Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. 😀

  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
musky hunter

Lots of small racks

Recommended Posts

I just picked up my deer at the meat processor in Poplar, Wi. Poplar is about 15 miles east of Superior, WI. The interesting thing is his backlog of deer. At least 150 were laid out on five hay wagons waiting to be butchered. Another hay wagon held the heads of the previously butchered deer, perhaps another 80 or so. Bucks easily outnumberd does by 3 or four to 1. But out of all those racks, not one was remotely close to a trophy. All were spindly, lots of 6's and 8's, one or two 10's and maybe one 12. But even those were small. The biggest of them all hardly had a base of 1" in diamater. Most of the deer came from northern Wisconsin, but one or two had Minnesota tags. The conclusion I come to, based on this small unscientific visual survey, is that typical woods deer in northern Wisconsin just don't seem to grow big racks. This would not be the place to find a Boone and Crocket trophy. Their body size, however, seems to be just fine with a proportional amount that would go 200 lbs easily. I'm sure someone out there is going to dissagree with me and I hope they post an opinion regarding rack sizes, particularly about northern Wisconsin. What I really find interesting is that only 30-50 miles away, just north and west of Duluth, is that some really nice deer have been taken this year with large racks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all scientific on my part and I have only hunted nothern wisconsin once but, having shot a trophy caliber buck I would not leave the head at the butcher. I would cape it myself or have them cape it on the spot and leave the carcass to be processed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could also be the Brown it's Down mentality, many think they have to kill a buck no matter the size. To get trophys you have the let the small ones go and shoot a doe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I live in the Mankato area but lived in Ashland for 5 years and my wife is from the Mason area which is just a bit east of you past Iron River. In the past 25 years that I have been back and forth from here to there it has been my experience that the corn fed deer around here grow bigger bodies earlier than the northern Wi deer do. The rack size per pound of body weight seems to be greater in Northern Wisconsin but I really don't see any really large deer there either. Usually at the Mother in laws there will be an 8 and a 10 pt buck eating in her back yard and the racks are respectable but not out of the ordinary.

It seems that the diet, minerals available etc in their diet can dictate whether their racks reach the full potential.

One thing is not a matter of debate to me- I have never eaten an antler but I have eaten deer from both areas and to me the taste of corn fed venison is far superior to the pine needle feed deer of that particular area and it isn't even close.

Of course my Brother in law doesn't see it that way and he prefers the taste of the woods fed venison over the field fed variety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with HNTNBUX

If I shot a Booner Buck, I wouldn't be leaving it at the processor with all the others.

Even if I shot a buck with a rack that I wanted to just put on a plaque, I'd cut the rack off when I dropped the deer off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree also. Even when I was young and we took our deer in we didn't leave the antlers on. I would never trust a trophy size rack to be left at a processor. It too easy for it to get "lost".

I can't speak to the overall antler quality of Northern WI bucks buts it is a known fact differnent geographical areas produce better antlers than others on a typical deer. Maybe the two situations came together to create what was seen at that processor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We (gun)hunt an area 25 miles south of Superior, for the past 20+ yrs, all public land. Oak ridges, swamps, etc., not a farm in sight. Another group has hunted the same area with us for almost the same amount of time. 'Small' racks/big body are the 'norm' for us to see; a booner or two show up here and there, but we know that the local hunters(us included) don't push the deer out of the thicker swamps either every year, so there are more around - how many and what size we will never know. The two wolf packs push the deer around, too - we expect boom/bust years and get it(more bust than boom), but that's hunting in NW WI. A few of us are from the Frederic area, where successful QDM plans have been in place for a number of yrs, but our preference is the 'big woods' and random size bucks it offers. We try to pass up the small bucks(6 pts or less), as does the other group, but we are meat hunters first, and will consider taking a large bodied 4-6 ptr, usually the 2nd weekend. We take out the surplus doe(s) when available (4 so far this yr), but continue to search for 'Brutus' and his brothers. Yes, we believe brown is down is the majority mentality for that area, for typical reasons: local economics, meat, lack of deer sighted, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll agree that maybe the big racks didn't make it to the meat cutter. And almost by definition, the trophy racks will only be produced by the top few percent of the herd under the best of conditions. But two deer struck me as indicative of the situation. One was a mature 10 point, with a large neck of unusually full proprotions and an above average body size. Had to be near his prime, but a nice but relatively small rack. The other deer had a very tall rack, almost looked like a juvenile 3x3 elk, but they were rather stick like and slender. My point is that even the older ones can't always produce big racks, and the reasons probably have to do with diet.

I think this speaks more to succes of areas that can respond favorably to QDM because they are predisposed to producing quality bucks because soils, genetics, climate, and food sources make it possible. I have dreams of bagging a 150+" buck, but those dreams might be unrealistic in some of these northern locations.

By the way, my little six pointer produced an absulutely thrilling hunt, as I'm sure all those other deer produced trophy memories for the hunters that bagged them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the bucks in NW WI have had pretty lame racks. Lots of points but they are narrow, skinny, short, tight baskets, etc. Big bodies though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Little late to the answers, but I switched over to NAP KILLZONE and could not be happier.  They are the cats meow.  I like them better than the Rage I was shooting before.  The pictures are from a doe I shot at 13 yards.  Needless to say she didn't go more than 30 yards before she piled up.
    • The whole reason behind getting a new bow is that my 17 year old son is now standing 6'3" and the little bear bow he has is too small for him.  He likes to bow hunt, but with sports and school activities he doesn't get out a ton, so i am going to crank down the poundage on my Elite and he wants to shoot that.  So Dad is in the market for a new bow.  I can't say a bad word about the Elite, its been a great bow for me.  I have always shot a double cam bow and was just looking for opinions about what other folks like.  Not sure if a solo cam will be smoother with the draw or not.  Soon as I have time, I want to get out and shoot some bows and see what I like.
    • Thanks MJ   It's nice for the picture and follow up video you catch a lot that gets missed after the picture.
    • i was just there on the 11th of Aug, yea i was way less then impressed with the cave. wont bother me none, but then again that wasthe first time in 5 years i've been in a cabelas.
    • Hello from the NW Angle!   Minnesota walleye fishing has been great using bottom bouncers and a night crawler. Anglers are being selective to fill limits with 16-18” fish as well as a few over 28 released. Most success has been in the mud, off of structure in 21-23 feet and 26-30 feet. The largest fish seem to come from South of Garden Island on crank-baits.   Canadian walleye are also most effectively targeted with bottom bouncers and spinners. Depth has not been as important as being at the bottom of a break line in the flat. Gold with chartreuse has been best as of late.  Musky activity has slowed from the prior weeks but expect it to ramp up with the full moon approaching. Perch have been schooled up on and around reefs topping out around 30 feet.   Water temps remain consistently in the low to mid 70’s.    Remember - fall is the time for trophy fish up at the NW Angle!   Until next week,   Sunset Lodge
    • It seems to be working😉
    • I've heard good things about the Browning's. 
    • Just curious- what about your old now is making you switch?   I've shot both and have no real concerns with either. Elite makes a nice bow and has several good options over the past few years. But... regardless of brand there are lots of good options out there. Shoot what feels good to you and hits where you're aiming. Totally generic,  but good advice IMO. 
    • I was surprised by that too Wanderer. I bought 2 of them about a month ago and am giving them a whirl. I've got 3 on bear baits right now. I'll have a feel for them in a couple weeks. 
    • I did not last year and I am not sure about this year.  I would sure like to.  New job and some new help at the hunt didnt allow me time to volunteer last year.  Hope this year is different.
×