Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
opsirc

NEW YORK CITY FLY OVER

29 posts in this topic

How many saw this in the news. Some one came up with a nother bad idea and did not think it through. when will the stupidty end, some people just do not use their brains anymore. Nothing like flying a 747 over new york followed by two fighter jets to get the people going. And for a photo shoot, bet that cost the taxpayers a few bucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heads will roll on this one, I am sure. Mayor Bloomberg was none too happy.

DD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not very "green" is it?? Couldn't they take a picture on the ground?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ever hear of photoshop

Indeed, it's a lot cheaper and safer.

My favorite thing is the people who ran when they saw it. I consider myself to be pretty fleet of foot but outrunning a jet? I guess having lived near the airport for so long I find it pretty absurd. Not anymore but before they redid the runways 747's used to pass right over my house at maybe 500 feet. Low enough to shake the walls at least. September 11th it was actually pretty eerie to not have the airplanes passing overhead...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Some one came up with a nother bad idea and did not think it through. when will the stupidty end, some people just do not use their brains anymore.

No worries. It was AIRFORCE ONE. The ah, Prez. is ah, angry. Only one person in the world can get those planes in the air so it ah,---- won't happen again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um...ahh, never mind, been in timout too much already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine the different reaction we'd have from the media if this would have happened a year ago........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And for a photo shoot, bet that cost the taxpayers a few bucks.

Yep, $328,835.00 to be exact. I guess you have to "stimulate" the economy somehow. mad

From Bloomberg:

McCain, the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, asked Gates to provide a description of the mission, who ultimately approved it and an estimate of how much it cost.

The flight by the VC-25, a modified Boeing Co. 747, and two F-16 fighter jets cost $328,835, Air Force spokeswoman Vicki Stein said.

Three-Hour Mission

That includes $300,658 for the larger plane, which flew a three-hour mission, and about $28,178 for the F-16 jets, which flew 1.8 hours each, Stein said in an e-mailed statement.

The total includes fuel used in flight, fuel used to power ground equipment used to prepare the aircraft, and ground maintenance, Stein said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another wonderful use of taxpayer dollars!!!!! mad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't you think they have enough photo's of that airplane yet? I bet they have thousand's of pic's of that airplane in the air over various landmarks. Why do they NEED another?

I think they may have been up to something else. According to the radio this morning, the reason given for the fly-over has changed some from the intiatial "photo-op" response. Plus, now they are blaming some low-level staffer for non-communication.

Nice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One story I read said that if they didn't do this fly over mission they would have simply done some other mission which would have cost the same amount.

There are probably 100 missions a day (some valuable and some fairly stupid) that are run by the military that cost this much or more but most aren't done in such poor taste.

I wouldn't worry about the costs that much. Afterall, the defense budget needs to be spent on something. Its not like there are two wars going on that the money could go towards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, the lack of common sense in this country astounds me. Nobody questioned this plan??? What a bunch of boneheads.

All I can do is just shake my head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

makes me embarassed to be the same species as those morons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think thats the theme in every administration.

In this case I doubt that the upper most level people had much knowledge about this unless the actual purpose of the flight is substantially different then what is being reported. For now I'll take the stated purpose at face value. Not sure what other purpose they would have for a fly over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what was the actual purpose of all this? I mean outside of continually wasting out money. If this had been done during Bush can you imagine what the media would have been done. This is just sick and it keeps getting sicker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another call to the White House Military Office, headed by Clinton-era Army Secretary Louis Caldera, the reporter explained how the Air Force was answering only questions about the cost of the flight and not anything else. Cornered, the WHMO official punted: "You'll have to call the White House press office." But White House press secretary Robert Gibbs couldn't shed any light on the matter either. "They've had [such photos] for at least two decades," Gibbs told TIME on Wednesday. "Our point was that we don't need a new one." (The publicity pictures, apparently, are released to the media and also handed out as souvenirs to guests who travel aboard the presidential plane.)

"It was a mistake," President Obama had said of the incident the day before, "and it will not happen again." The White House has steadfastly refused to rule out firing Caldera, whom Obama appointed with a glowing recommendation. "Louis has served his country with distinction in uniform and in government, and his pedigree is second to none," the President said at the time. "I know he'll bring to the White House the same dedication and integrity that have earned him the highest praise in every post."

Seems like the Media was all over it today from what I saw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if Obama admits it was a mistake, how about he pays us back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a conspiracy here. I think he did it to mess with ya , he is testing you to see how far he can get you off your rocker. laugh. I think he likes pushing them buttons just to get you all riled up.

Man if we had all the presidents pay us back for all the stupid stuff they were affiliated to there would be no deficit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet Obama would pay us back for this mistake if George W. agreed to pay us back for the Iraq war mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, I know to me wasting money on a photo op and fighting terrorism and to keep our freedom is on the same plane. crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think the Iraq war was a flawlessly run campaign? I wasn't talking about the merit of the war but simply how it was conducted. Sending troops into battle without the proper equipment is a flaw much bigger then a bungled photo op.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never said that and I don't want to turn this into another war thread to get shut down. But you can't compare the two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree its not the time or place to discuss that. And you're right you can't compare the two as they are on much different scales.

But I think the point to be made is that there are plenty of mistakes to be pointed out no matter what President you want to discuss.

Really I doubt Obama had anything to do with this. Does it really take a Presidential order to conduct a photo shoot? I suspect not, I assume someone much lower made the decision and thats the guy that should pay for the mistake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   (Really needs to pay more attention to what the trulolo singer is actually saying..)      
    •   Because you have an affinity for such things??..    No, seriously, you need to take a good look at your browser's advanced settings.  Some browsers can be set so they will automatically wipe your cookies and search history every time you shut the browser down.  Not sure which browsers have this capability, but the one I use is Epic.    
    •   If we retrace what happened to get Obamacare passed in the first place, we need to remember the narrative that was used by the Democrats that there were 49 million Americans with no insurance.  Now they are saying 24 million Americans will lose their insurance if the law is struck down.  So I'm taking that to mean they actually got 24 million people to sign up in the exchanges under the law after 7 years.  So about as "successful" as the REAL ID Act...   Between the healthcare industry, big pharma, and the insurance industry, somewhere between $300 and $400 million was spent in lobbying to get the ACA passed.   The Koch brothers are pledging $300 to $400 million in the 2018 election cycle to strike the legislation down, and have also stated they will not support any politician in the future who votes for Ryan-Care.   It's how things work in the real world, like it, or not....
    •   Can anyone explain why I get ads here for dating sites with a picture of a big busted older woman   or Russian and oriental girls looking for marriage when I don't even go on those sites?
    •    In a  free market, ObamaCare would have collapsed two years ago. And all the promises made regarding it are and have been falling apart.   But government does not let boondoggles collapse. ObamaCare will be funded, unfortunately, with more debt and printing to keep it and all it's problems on life support   Think "too big to fail" and QE    
    •   Nunes Backs Down From Assertion Trump Was Monitored   Keep reading your fake news Uncle Bill. Also Nunes canned the next committee hearing on Russia. He is basically a Trump crony at this point, trying his best to obstruct the committees investigation.   There's Trump's transition team. Now go back and watch the Comey hearing. I think you will hear a certain 2 GOP representatives who are only worried about who is leaking intelligence rather than what the intelligence says (or literally the exact same thing Trump says).
    •   They could for example sell the information to your insurance company that would promptly adjust your rates if you showed a tendency toward unhealthy behaviors. It doesn't take much imagination.   There is actually a plan to fight this one. The goal is to crowd source some funding, then purchase the data for congressmen and publish them all to the public.     
    • Ah......the wet dream again.  To make varsity, you have to keep your material fresh and creative. While everyone else is playing Chess, you are still playing Boggle.
    • Maybe you could ask Rick for some HSO decals to go on the front of those bad boys eh?    All kidding aside, nice work.
  • Our Sponsors