Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
tray

Using two poles for summer fishing?

Recommended Posts

Last sping there was talk of being able to run two lines this year. Has anyone heard of thing about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the incentive for the legislature to do this?

Look at it this way, limits on fish are being lowered to conserve the resource, slot restrictions are becoming common to manage size, and more pressure is hitting the lakes every year. Why would two lines be endorsed as an idea in alignment with those trends?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at it this way it would clear up a lot of lake congestion. Two lines and smaller limits would mean less time on the water and therefore possibly less traffic on lakes.

Maybe it would be a good thing but personally I have a hard enough time fishing with one line on occasion and would not even want to hassle with two lines. Again that is just me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last sping there was talk of being able to run two lines this year. Has anyone heard of thing about this?

Yes, last year a bill was in the legislature to allow two lines on open water but it did not pass.

The bill was introduced again this year and it is in the House version of the Omnibus Game and Fish bill but not the Senate's. It will probably come down to the conference committee again (as it did last year where it was removed) unless an amendment is made and accepted when the Senate votes on their Omnibus bill this session.

Both Omnibus Game and Fish bills should be hitting the floor in the next week or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at it this way it would clear up a lot of lake congestion. Two lines and smaller limits would mean less time on the water and therefore possibly less traffic on lakes.

Maybe it would be a good thing but personally I have a hard enough time fishing with one line on occasion and would not even want to hassle with two lines. Again that is just me.

I believe it is up to 3 lines in the summer now in sconie, as it reads it is illegal to fish with more than 3 hooks, baits or lure.

I think with all culling or holding one back from the limit I don't think the lakes will clear any sooner.

To me it dont much matter, I'm like you Bottle Fish one is enough for me. On occasion I will do 2 on the St.Croix but not often at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have wanted 2 lines for years. Especially when I am trolling crankbaits and am alone or when fishing is slow. Nice to see when one color or bait is better than another. I fished the Croix for years that way. Now that I live in Baudette I wish I could on the Rainy. As mentioned here there are times when 2 lines is a pain but I would like to make that decision myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to see you be able to use 2 lines when trolling at least. There aren't too many other times I want to use 2 lines anyway. I'll be doing a lot of fishing by myself this year as I am new to the state and don't know anybody yet to go fishing with so I'd like to be able to troll with 2 lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just becasue you CAN fish with 2 lines, doesnt mean you will.

I live in a state and fish in a different state that allows multiple lines and the only time Id ever have two lines in the water is trolling plugs alone in the boat. Or, possibly perch fishing with a dead stick.

Tis better to fish one line well, than 2 lines poorly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ya it would take alittle gettin use to

pullin cranks and bobber fishing it would be cool

depends on how you runing ur boat if i'am on the bow steering with my feet then you could rig or jig with both hand but it would take some gettin use to if ur running a tiller i dunno

i'm old but up for new tricks lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minnesota DNR studies have shown that around 7% of all fishermen actually catch a limit of fish. If every one used two lines more would catch limits thereby hurting the resource. (Think of it this way, if you went fishing today by yourself, and then the next day went fishing with your buddy. You don't think you'd catch more fish fishing with your buddy? That one line vs two). Having a limit wouldn't make a difference. Otherwise, why stop at two? Let everyone use ten lines. You can't compare to what other states are doing. Wisconsin doesn't allow trolling, and many of their lakes in the ceded areas have limits as low as only one fish. As someone has already said, a year or two ago there was talk of lowering the limit for walleyes to as low as two, and with slot limits, and many lakes going to a limit of four why would you want to risk hurting the resource by allowing two lines. Just doesn't make sense. Most people are happy with it just the way it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people are happy with it just the way it is.

Informal polls taken here (a fishing HSOforum) have shown otherwise, and by a fairly wide margin at that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, one line HAD to be bobber only, so it wouldn't be practical to ALWAYS use 2 lines.

I lived in SD for a few years, no closed season and 2 lines anytime. It certainly didn't hurt the resource. I caught more walleyes there than in most lakes here in MN. And yes, I have heard the argument "well there is less people than in MN." , but there are more lakes here. To me, it won't matter much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minnesota DNR studies have shown that around 7% of all fishermen actually catch a limit of fish.

just curious, do these studies publish what % of fishermen are catch and release only?

I'd gladly take a limit of 1 or 0 walleye/northerns/bass for 2 lines in open water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont believe it would hurt fishin limits are limits

if they do they do if not thats fine to i'll be fishing either way lol

and catching fish !!! lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A poll taken here is not a good indication of people's thinking across Minnesota. It's not a good sampling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the mn dnr sets the walleye limit at 4 or 6 or whatever for that matter(not to mention slots), they must be prepared for the worst case scenario: Most people taking limits of fish most or every time they go fishing.

That’s why the dnr set's a # limit; because in their opinion, that’s how many fish can be safely taken and still sustain the population.

Personally I would like to see MN allow the use of two lines in summer. I mostly CPR and only keep what I can cook fresh (no freezing of fillets for me), so for me and others who would do the same, the use of an extra line would have no impact on the overall fish population. As stated above, it would only make my time on the water more efficient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A poll taken here is not a good indication of people's thinking across Minnesota. It's not a good sampling.

I disagree with that, this site represents a good cross section of fishermen in MN. I really don't care how the non-fishers feel about the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<If the mn dnr sets the walleye limit at 4 or 6 or whatever for that matter(not to mention slots), they must be prepared for the worst case scenario: Most people taking limits of fish most or every time they go fishing.

That’s why the dnr set's a # limit; because in their opinion, that’s how many fish can be safely taken and still sustain the population.>>

Makes sense, but that's not how it works. I talked to the DNR, and they set limits by what's actually happening. Think Mille Lacs.

<<I disagree with that, this site represents a good cross section of fishermen in MN. I really don't care how the non-fishers feel about the issue.>>

It's the method that's used. It's not random. Having people respond to a poll is much different then random calling and getting opinions. It's not scientific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • I've always been partial to the fold down couch in the back but I'd want to have storage under it and a fold down bunk above it. One thing to keep in mind is the heater.  I know you said the current heater stays for this season and maybe next but if you're doing work on the layout now you should probably plan for the new heater now even if its not going in for a year or two.  You'd hate to do all this work adjusting the layout only to find out you should have done something differently to accommodate the new heater. 
    • If mine,  I would add those drop down bunks and some pedestal boat seats.  With a smaller house like that I would want as much open area as possible.  I think those big couch/sofas take too much room.  You can always drop the bunk and take a snooze without taking up floor fishing space.  Just some thoughts.......
    • I tried a glass of a buddy's Templeton Rye last night and was impressed. I'm not big of Rye's but this one was very smooth. I can't say I'd ever buy a bottle but someone else's booze is always up near the top of the list of my favorites. I still prefer the $15 Trader Joe's bourbon though. 
    • I didn't figure anyone at cabelas would be any help. I have scoured the gun and haven't ever been able to find any markings of any kind. I forgot to mention in the previous post that it's a 16 gauge.  If nothing else, it'll look cool hanging over my basement bar. 
    • Ha I remember showing ya a thing or 2!!! Not sure where your son got his fishin prowess from though! Yea well!! oh I changed my poopy pants!
    • I can't see the pics?
    • You might be better off trying to do some research on your own on the old shotgun. I think it would be a waste of time taking it to Cabela's since most of the folks  who work there now think  any gun made before 1970 is an antique. The gun surely is made in Europe and might have originated in one of the English or Belgian or even German "guild" shops, little outfits that cranked out inexpensive guns that did not even bear maker's names since they were made by a "bunch" of guys. Your best bet would be to trace or photograph the proof marks and go from there.  That is,  I'm assuming it has proof marks :).
    • For an exciting adventure in shooting grab an old "trapdoor" Springfield and rattle off a few rounds of 45-70 or 45-90.  If you're of skinny build and little weight it'll give you a THUMP you'll remember!   Perfect deer cartridge for MN though since that big ol' bullet will go churning through the brush like a D-8 Cat until it hit's it's target. Have been around the old '94 30-30 since way back when and while it is handy it is not that accurate and lacks the knock-down power of many, many of today's rounds. But if you just have to have one as I always say, it''s your money. Keep in mind you can buy the .35 Remington in a pump action,   which a lot of MN duck hunters find easy to use come deer season.
    • I have an old Damascus barreled shotgun that was passed on to me by my grandpa. The story I have always heard and been told is that it was brought over from Denmark by my great grandfather in 1915. It has no markings indicating where it was made or anything else that I could use to figure out some history on the gun. It is a pin fire and has a stag carved into the underside of the stock. Anyone have any ideas on where I could find any info on this? I had thought about bringing it to Cabelas and see if they knew anything about it. I'm not concerned about the value. I'd just like to know a little more about it or even get pointed in the right direction. 
    • I like the .30-.30 because of availability and affordability of the ammo but I think the .35 Remington may be a better overall round. I don't know anything about the .45-70 Gov. though.
  • Our Sponsors