Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gus

Anyone own a Alumacraft Classic 165CS

15 posts in this topic

Looking at buying a new boat. The most common package I see is with a 50HP 2 stroke yammi. Anyone comment on how that motor handles the boat with and without a load? How does the motor troll?

Does anyone know if the Classic was always rated for 75HP max? All I can find data on is the 09 boats which are rated for 75max but I found another document that said the classic was rated for 50 max, however that document does not say what year boat or when it was published.

Wondering what your opinions are. Ideally I'd love to go max HP and 4 stroke but I think that is going to add way too much to the price tag. Wondering if there is a good compromise or not. Please let me know your comments guys. Any other comparably priced combos I should really look at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dad has this boat. His is an an older version, but basically in brand new condition still with a 50 hp 4 stroke Yamaha. Comfortable for 2 or 3 people to fish from. His had trouble with getting on plane with 3 adults in it and our gear. With 2 people, it moved along at about 30 mph and handled well. I owned a similar make of boat (SmokerCraft) that had a 70 hp Evinrude. Huge difference in getting on plane with the extra horsepower! Go big or go home if you can. Otherwise, just enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gus, I agree with the above post. Mine is a 2002, but they called it a Navigator 165CS back then. Don't confuse it with the deeper, wider Navigator they have now, it is the exact same boat as the Classic 165CS.

The 50hp is OK with two people (28 mph), sucks with more. If I had my choice again, I would look for a 60-75hp 2 stroke, don't like the weight of the 4 strokes.

I know Sandmand has a 75hp Merc on his Classic and from reading his posts, it performs well. Not sure if Evinrude makes a e-tec 60hp, but if they do it would well worth the look.

Bottom line is I really like the boat, but a 50hp is not big enough for it. They offer this size to keep the price low and (hopefully) the sales up.

Good luck

157084627_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at a Classic last year, '08. They were rated for 75 max last year. I have a Lund Rebel which competes with the Classic. Mine has a 75 Yamaha 4s on it. It's very quiet and has plenty of get up. I wouldn't go heavier than this (369 lbs) for weight distribution. I also wouldn't buy anything less than a 60 hp for maintainint proper boat performance. I considered Yamaha 4s and 2S Evinrude Etechs primarily. Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked up the '08 Classic 165 CS with a 50/2 yamaha right before walleye opener last year. I'd have to agree with the other opinions that the 50 does the job but it is rated for the 75. I can't argue one bit against the 50 but the 75 could only be faster. Just picked her up out of storage last weekend so we're ready to go.

IMO - 3 people in the boat can work but it's a real comfortable 2 person boat with all the gear and other stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... but it's a real comfortable 2 person boat with all the gear and other stuff.

Yeah, I agree. I just wish it would jump out of the hole a little quicker. I might ad a hydrofoil fin to the motor on mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish-I-were-fishin - do you have a tach on your boat?

9 times out of 10 if you think you need to add a hydrafoil you have a propping issue that would resolve it. In this case, you'd need to drop pitch, lose a little top end speed, but pick up holeshot.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideally I'd love to go max HP and 4 stroke but I think that is going to add way too much to the price tag.

I've had 2 boats over the years that were under powered and wasn't happy with either one. If you can swing it, max out the HP. Maybe add another year on the payments or whatever but IMO you'll be happier if you do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses guys. After talking it over with the mrs. we are going to wait a year so we can get what we really want. This will be our first NEW boat and we don't want to make compromises to afford it. We have a boat (78 Lund Pike) that will keep us on the water, so the new and shiny will have to wait a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses guys. After talking it over with the mrs. we are going to wait a year so we can get what we really want... so the new and shiny will have to wait a year.

You just ruined somebody's day. Boat salesman need your money THIS year smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good call on waiting to get what you really want. Fall pricing can be excellent anyway. Also check out the competition, if you haven't already. Decide which one has the best layout, features, etc. I looked at the 16' Crestliner Fishhawk, Lund Rebel, and Alumacraft Classic. All similar, but all had different positives. Very similar pricing for these three. One of the dealers in town essentially sold me a Rebel for just a tad more than a Classic. Pricing for all three were within about $1000 or so with similar features, though the Crestliner was on liquidation from CP going out of business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tracker has a sweet looking boat (Pro Guide V-16) also. Watch out though, they always list those rigs with a dinky motor.

Cabalas sells Lowe and they look good too. Missing a compartment on the drivers side however. Not sure why they did this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt want to be the first to say you might want to check around but...I would get a Lund or G3. For one reason, the SporTrak. Its a great idea. Having drilled a few holes and more importantly filled a few old holes in gunwhales, I wouldnt get a boat without it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....I would get a Lund or G3. For one reason, the SporTrak. Its a great idea. ... I wouldnt get a boat without it.

What is it? Some sort of channel mounting rail?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll give my 2 cents on comparing the three I looked at:

Size: beam width Fishhawk, Rebel, Classic in that order

Rear Casting Deck: best on Fishhawk since it extends on sides all the way to transom.

Rod Lockers: bigger opening on Lund and double rod lockers. Good on Classic also. Single for Crestliner.

Layout: more room in bow for Fishhawk, more room behind console in Lund. Personal preference based on intended use.

Livewell: long livewell on Lund

Classic: Came with water separator filter from factory. I think it had the thickest aluminum out of the three. Did not charge for re-rigging with other motor choices. Nice looking dash. Did not have carpeting on inside of boat walls. Why I don't know; this would really class it up IMO. I didn't like how they didn't hide all the control wires either.

Rebel: IPS hull. Before mentioned sportrack and protrack to eliminate drilling holes for holders and snap covers. Aft jump seats are really nice option to give the boat more seating capacity and flip down casting deck. Slick looking dash. My favorite layout and interior/exterior appearance. For some reason, no bow storage vinyl cover on this. No bow storage area for trolling battery either (a must for weight distribution). I had to convert mine and re-route the wires.

Fishhawk: Cargo nets in bow were standard. Feels like bigger boat than other two, partially because of lack of starboard rod locker. Extreme bow storage is limited. Nice battery compartment in bow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • LOL Then YOU my friend are the one who jumped to conclusions in your last post because that was a direct quote from the post you were replying to. You did say it was NOT a joke, right?
    • Finally saw a few divers myself today.  In town.    Yah, I don't think it would make much of a difference if they let us just keep going.  
    • Whoooaaa...slow down big fella. Of course I do not think one party is any more "evil" than the other.  I don't think ANY of them are evil, they just have, more or less, different basic principles. You my friend,  have some serious attitude problems and seem to be very prone to jumping to conclusions and letting your paranoid tendency's run away with you. I have many friends on both sides of the two MAJOR parties and have worked with a couple of genuine Libertarians too. I can only recall a couple individuals I would consider might be "evil" in your sense of the word. Shucks,   I don't even think YOU are evil.   Ha Ha HA!
    • Salami ready to eat. 1/2 goose.....1/2 beef. Much firmer than using pork.Love this seasoning. Garlic, smoke and peppercorns. I always add extra garlic to it. Lately I have gone to using powdered smoke. 1 tsp. per pound of meat. Gives me a consistent flavor every time. No guessing how much smoke to have. Also allows to use the oven inside instead of out in the cold.   Summer sausage in the oven now while I watch football.  
    • --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------             You might want to read what was actually typed:     Do you really believe your side is good and the other is evil? If you do, that's the part that is a big joke.
    • below is a link for doing pork loin jerky. you can use any whole meat for this.       click here :)
    • Nice conspiracy theory.  So how come after they tested additional thousands of deer they didn't find any more, if they were looking for an excuse?      What were you expecting as far as policing the borders?  How many folks would be necessary, and how on earth would they do it?   But whatever.  You sound just like those guys back in the day over by Madison Wisconsin that had big money in their deer hunting land and raising trophy bucks.  No way were they going to kill a bunch of their deer.    And look at it now.  30 percent infection levels.     It's like AIS.   They are doing what they can within the limits of budget, manpower, and politics.     Look at the map of cwd infested counties in Wisconsin... I posted it up above.   Do you want Minnesota to look like that?  Do you want to eat deer with CWD?  
  • Our Sponsors