Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
gunflint

Rope Formula

10 posts in this topic

Is there a standard when it comes to rope dimension? What is the thinnest rope for a 20# anchor? What about mooring lines for the boat? I'm getting tired of tripping of large diameter rope all over the boat. Two anchor lines, mooring lines etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can go with a braided fish line but the determining factor is what feels good pulling it from the bottom. I prefer at least a half-inch nylon or poly. Cheap plastic doesn't weather well and ends up as slivers in your hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the anchor winch setups use only 3/16 nylon. If you go that route, be sure to check it and replace it before it wears thin and breaks.

A shock absorbing bungee setup can allow you to get by using the thinner rope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also add a 3'lenght of chain at my anchor and to the rope. This really helps the anchor hold well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1/4" even 3/16 will hold a 20# anchor in a solid core nylon braid on boats of 17' or less, the solid core construction is key to added strength. A 3' cable or chain length above the anchor will eliminate most concerns for cut-offs in sharp rock environments.

Thinner anchor lines are less bulky but are also harder on the hands and more difficult to get to hold in standard cleats. For this reason 3/8 solid core nylon braids are as thin as I go, and 1/2" is my personal favorite to use. I do a lot of anchor sets in a day when guiding catfish, and the easy on the hands factor is an issue for me as is easy and solid rope retention on my cleats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinner anchor lines are less bulky but are also harder on the hands and more difficult to get to hold in standard cleats.

Last year early May out in front of the wigwam, my buddies rope had about 5 too many years on his rope, and with the current his anchor was acting more like a heavy wind sock. It was really not fun pulling up every 10 mins for 2 hrs. I was picking slivers out of my hand for a day or two. A little extreme of an example, but next time we go, I'm buying him a new rope!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a braided nylon rope. It has no memory, is limp, has shock absorbing stretch, and while I use smaller dia, it is soft and not abrasive on the hands. Ties well, and cleats up perfectly. When I pull anchor the rope will lay in the bottom of an icecream bucket or stay in a small pile on the floor. When the day is over its easily gathered with no twisting.

I's stay away from any twisted polypropylene or manila type ropes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use 1/2" on my anchors with 4' shock bungie things betweeen the rope and anchor. I also wind my rope up on extension cord reels to keep the mess at a min. Docking ropes are always tied to a cleat loose ends tucked away or stashed in a close by compartment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was up at Gander a couple of days ago looking around. I looked at the MN Kota Deck Hand 40. The rope was not more than 3/8th of an inch and was an 800 lb test nylon. I use a 5/8th nylon no tangle ropes. I've got lots of storage in my boat so storage is not a problem, but I've seen some boats with rope bags in them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a 35# navy and a waterspike that i use in different situations. both have 1/2 inch rope. 1/2 inch is as small dia as i would use for reasons mentioned above. i also use a gripper style cleat on my bow to hold the anchor rope, they require a spicefic dia rope to work without slipage. i keep them in a stroage tub with holes drilled in the bottom so water will drain out. i don't use a lid as the tub didn't come with one. i found it in the ditch by my house. the deckhands look good on paper, but i just can't trust one of those holding a 35# anchor ripping accross mille lacs in a good chop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Where did you hear that food plots were to be banned?   I have seen about banning "feeding deer"  which I took to mean the classic set up a feeder and dump corn and alfalfa in it.     Jumping on areas immediately has been shown to be successful in preventing isolated cases from spreading and becoming endemic.   Once it becomes established in the herd, it seems as if controlling it is no longer possible.   It also seems as if CWD is fairly hard to catch for a deer, or else it would be all over everywhere and all the deer in an area like Dane county would have it.    Oh, and the infected deer could have come from a deer farm, or from Iowa where it has been detected in the county bordering MN on the SE.    
    • I wouldn't call myself wealthy, but I've made good life choices that have enabled me to buy my own land.  Still pack my own lunch and watch for sales at the grocery store.  I don't own land in SE MN, I own land in northern MN.  The reason I am concerned is that this will serve as a template for herd control tactics in other parts of MN.  Understand that the game management agencies have conferences where they talk about managing hunters.  You don't have to look any further than the work of Dr. Gary Alt in Pennsylvania.    I can't put my finger on exactly what is going on with the results the DNR has presented.  Were the samples snuck in by a nefarious actor?  I wouldn't rule it out.  Was the disease always here and just finally discovered?  I don't see why not.  Is there a unique environmental reason that CWD hasn't gotten a broad foothold here?  It's possible.    If the agency had some credibility going into this, I'd be on board pounding kool aid myself, but they don't.  So color me skeptical.  None of the WI border counties along zone 3 have CWD according to this map.  However, Burnett and Polk do and there is no monitoring on our side up there.  Can a scientist explain that to me?  Because the geographic barriers up there are non-existent compared to  the Mississippi River along zone 3.       
    • I made the decision to replace the pump every few years rather than the carpet.
    • On my aluminum skid house I've been using thread cutting stainless steel screws from Fastenal
    • There might be a pleasant surprise in the works.   In the meantime, it is entertaining to watch anyway....      
    • Huh---Guess you must have the butthurt.
    • You are cooking it before you eat it right? I've only heard people using Cure when using dehydrators or may be for jerky when using burger. I have never used the stuff but don't like or make dehydrated jerky.   Seem to still be alive!
    • Creepworm, I am somewhat angry.  The reason it's fool hardy to consider food plots any more threat than a farm field is that the intentions of the planter don't change the flavor of the forage.  A food plot is no more attractive than the edge of a 160 acre bean field that meets a fence line, swamp edge, or grove.     Now imagine there are no farm fields or food plots at all, not even a decent yielding apple tree.  Deer will still communicate via scrape trees and licking branches during the rut.  If the current belief is that the prions spread via saliva, what's to stop wild deer from licking a branch that an infected buck has licked?  What's to stop a buck from rubbing their face all over a contaminated branch?    My fear is that lots of deer are going to be slaughtered in an area that just happens to have been a hot target for eradication before CWD was found.  I'm also worried we're going to get all kinds of bad rules imposed that won't do squat to actually stop the spread if the disease is actually in MN.  I'm worried we'll lose a critical habitat tool that allows us in harsh winter kill areas to help the deer make it through winter (food plots).    It'd be interesting to watch the DNR try to ban food plots.  Good luck defining what is and is not a food plot. 
    • Don't know how they got there.  Maybe they got confused with CWD and wandered up from Iowa.   Or maybe there are a few more but they didn't happen to get shot or didn't get tested.     So, you are a wealthy land owner?  Is the land in 348?     Sure, you are free to question the DNR.   I never said you weren't.   And you, so far as I know, are free to refuse to cooperate with the program to control CWD.   As I have said, that is exactly the response of the land owners in Wisconsin that I recall from back in the day.     However I am curious.   Are you accusing the DNR of planting or fabricating this instance of cwd for some nefarious purpose, like killing most of the deer in that area for unknown reasons?   Or do you just think that these were the only two sick deer and everything will be fine without any action? 
    • Nice product.  Would work great with my Lindell Ice Rigs....
  • Our Sponsors