Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Cast A Way

New "one" over rule for 2009 ??

18 posts in this topic

I haven't picked up the new 2009 regs yet, but read in the paper that for 2009, you may only keep one walleye over 20" whether it's in your boat, freezer, or at the taxidermist. It takes effect on this years opener. If you have a over fish at the taxidermist - it is considered in your possesion until finished. If you have one in your freezer you may not take another until that one is consumed. SO ??

This also applies to the northern pike regs. of one over 30".

P1010062.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice catch. It is true. Last year it was limited to one a day now it is,like you say, only one is allowed in posession. IMO this is over the line.

This is confusing to me as I fish a boarder water and the regs only 6 with 15 inch minninum no mention of the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately a nice catch. Went unnoticed by me. Doesn't affect me in most cases, but I agree with the intent of the rule. Thanks for passing it along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice fish there!! i wish i could get something besides carp over 30".. whats on the illegal list for next year??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats on the illegal list for next year??

Hopefully 5 walleyes and 3 rods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isnt really a "new" rule this year. Both walleye and northern have been this way. For walleye it was changed a couple of years ago from one over 22 in. down to one over 20 inches in possesion and both daily and total possesion fit this. Northern was identical except that it is one over 30in allowed in possesion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isnt really a "new" rule this year. Both walleye and northern have been this way.

It is new because as stated, in the past it was one of 20" per day, now it is one over 20" in possesion.

I too feel this is a bit restrictive and unneeded (not to mention near impossible to enforce), at what point does a fish in taxidermy cease being a fish and start being a wall ornament?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...and are we now keeping entrails of the over 20's in our freezer for proof of length?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

at what point does a fish in taxidermy cease being a fish and start being a wall ornament?

After the flesh is thrown away and you pay the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prety soon their going to tell us how we can and cant fish on certain lakes like Wisconsin does. I mean stricter rules like you cant troll here but you can there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The St Croix has no max size length, just a 15" min also pool 3 and down is the same, how are they going to prove what body of water the fish came out of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i just have a feeling one day........ it's gonna be, if u caught it on the startboard side, the limit is 15" n if it was caught on the port side it's 16" or if it's hooked on the roof of the mouth it's 18" n the bottom it's 20".

then if u grinned once while reeling it's ...........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some rules are put in place as a feel good measure only. Take a state wide slot limit for example. There is no scientific reason for one but a lot of people think that there should be one. Banning lead is another one. I don't know if the "one over 20" is an example of such a rule but there several such rules presented every legislative session. Some stick some don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rules are there for the greater good. The question is do we call it conservation focusing on more of the utilitarian point of view and where does that stop or how far should we take it.

Or do we call it preservation trying to keep things natural and balanced.

Just something to ponder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or..............it is laws written by lawyers, for lawyers?????????

My feeling is, use your best judgement, do what is best for the lake at whiich you are fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My feeling is, use your best judgement, do what is best for the lake at whiich you are fishing.

I'm all for common sense and for doing what you think is right. And when it comes to laws and game regulations, the right thing to do is to follow the rules, and the best thing for the lake is to follow the rules the DNR and their biologists have put in place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do people really need to keep a limit of 20+" walleyes? I enjoy walleye just as much as the next guy, but over 18-19 and they are going back. I prefer 14-16" fish for cooking up. I have never kept one over 19.

Last year my uncle kept a 27" walleye and filleted the thing. I asked him how it tasted, and he said "Mercury". He knew I was giving him carp, but seriously.

I guess I will just keep fishing Pool 2 and put em all back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We need the real German RH1 here. He would pick them out Pronto!
    • In the end, LMIT met his karmic retribution when he got kicked in the head by a mule and came back as D2E. 
    •   Attached is what you can get with the $40 package with SlingTV. Looks like they have history but not discovery. They also have $20 and $25 packages. The only thing I watched with any regularity when I had it was ESPN so I dropped it. 
    • I'm also a moderator, and just about to shut your  garbage mouth posts down. Go get yourself an education, which you still have not provided proof of, and never will,  because there IS nothing to provide. You are nothing but an  ill-advised rabble rouser. There is no room here for your continual name calling and personal attacks/bashing.  I will warn you now to go read the rules of the site before your name-calling posts start to disappear in entirety.
    • Well said Del! There weren't issues till he decided to stick his nose in it. The mod for that thread did just fine.
    • I meant harmless in the sense they don't kill fish. With that being said, I'm sure the host fish would prefer that it not have a lamprey attached to it, but at the end of the day, the fish will live...literally. Lampreys are very common in the upper St. Croix River system. I see them attached to redhorse all the time, which makes sense, as redhorse are by far the most abundant fish in the system. If the lampreys haven't "crashed" that system after several thousand years of coexistence, I'm liking gamefishes' chances for the next several thousand years also 
    • John Podesta May Have Violated Federal Law By Not Disclosing 75,000 Stock Shares 3/26/2017 Daily Caller   John Podesta, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 national campaign chairman, may have violated federal law by failing to disclose the receipt of 75,000 shares of stock from a Kremlin-financed company when he joined the Obama White House in 2014, according to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. Joule Unlimited Technologies — financed in part by a Russian firm —  originally awarded Podesta 100,000 shares of stock options when in 2010 he joined that board along with its Dutch-based entities: Joule Global Holdings, BV and the Stichting Joule Global Foundation. When Podesta announced his departure from the Joule board in January 2014 to become President Obama’s special counsellor, the company officially issued him 75,000 common shares of stock. The Schedule B section of the federal government’s form 278 which — requires financial disclosures for government officials — required Podesta to “report any purchase, sale or exchange by you, your spouse, or dependent children…of any property, stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities when the amount of the transaction exceeded $1,000.”   Podesta’s form 278 Schedule B is blank regarding his receipt of any stock from any company. Liberals and conservatives alike tell TheDCNF Podesta should have disclosed the stock. “Well Podesta should certainly have been more upfront in filling this out.  Clearly, it should have been fully disclosed,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the liberal group Public Citizen which was founded by Ralph Nader.  “That’s the point of the personal financial disclosure forms, especially for anyone entering the White House,” he told TheDCNF in an interview. “If the transfer of stock took place, it had to be disclosed,” added former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova in an interview. “If he didn’t, clearly it’s a violation.”   OH, MY...   And there is soo much more to this story...   Absolute criminals...   Link
    • Schumer goes off on Trump supporter at NYC restaurant, witness says Published March 27, 2017 New York Post   Witness: Schumer went off on Trump supporter at restaurant Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., caused a scene at a Manhattan restaurant when he began yelling at a wealthy and well-connected Donald Trump supporter that the POTUS is “a liar.” Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, lost his cool on Sunday night at Upper East Side restaurant Sette Mezzo, according to witnesses. He was dining with friends when he encountered Joseph A. Califano Jr. — the former U.S. secretary of health, education and welfare under President Jimmy Carter and domestic policy adviser to President Lyndon B. Johnson — and his wife, Hilary, who were having a quiet dinner. Onlookers said Schumer was incensed that Hilary — the daughter of William S. Paley, the founder and chairman of CBS — had voted for Trump, even though her husband, Joseph, is a well-known Democrat. One witness said of the restaurant rant, “They are a highly respected couple, and Schumer made a scene, yelling, ‘She voted for Trump!’ The Califanos left the restaurant, but Schumer followed them outside.” On the sidewalk, Schumer carried on with his fantastical filibuster: “ ‘How could you vote for Trump? He’s a liar!’ He kept repeating, ‘He’s a liar!’ ” Hilary confirmed the confrontation, telling Page Six, “Sen. Schumer was really rude . . . He’s our senator, and I don’t really like him. Yes, I voted for Trump. Schumer joined us outside and he told me Trump was a liar. I should have told him that Hillary Clinton was a liar, but I was so surprised I didn’t say anything.”   Sheezus....   What an unhinged lunatic a-hole....   Could you imagine if this had been paul ryan acting in this way ??   I think a knee to the groin was in order..
  • Our Sponsors