Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Steve Foss

Your honest assessment, please

55 posts in this topic

I'm not looking for comments from an uber-picky photographer perspective, so if folks can take off that hat and put on the hat of a regular human being, please do, and let me know if this has impact for you.

Thanks so much in advance for looking and commenting, everyone. smilesmile

3403210828_696c64f8e2_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's terrific - haunting is probably the closest emotion I can label. It would take a special kind of "decor", but it is definitely a unique portrait. I like it - a lot smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the look of this wolf appearing out of "nowhere". It's like you know something's there, but you can't see it until he/she sticks it's head through the darkness.

Another thing that cathces my eye about this pic Steve is the fact this wolf is virtually unscathed. No scars or bald areas on the face to indicate any brawling has occurred. It's just a very very clean look.

Good job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my only suggestion would maybe be a closer crop, more like your avatar now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I know a tatoo artist could make it look the same I'd wear it, it kinda creaps up on you and before you no it it's to late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the bigger pic-coming out of all the blackness-those menacing eyes that just hold you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve- I am definitely not a photographer....but I think that pic is cool. I saw the pic as your avatar earlier today and it caught my eye immediately. I sat and stared at it and thought "wow". Nice.

Good job.

Thor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great pic, maybe one of if not the best wolf pic I have seen. I love wolves and have been looking reading about them for 35 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the effect, Steve. I'm kinda partial to that even with some the studio stuff I do. If I had any C&C, it would be that the canvas is just a bit too big for me. Personal preference of course - I get bit pretty hard on npn for not leaving enough canvas so you can take that nit with a grain of salt! smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone. Thanks for looking, thinking, commenting.

Ken, I take all nits with a grain of salt, especially when they come from photographers as stern as you look in your avatar. You darn teachers. You're so mean! gringringrin

I look at the eyes of the wolf and then I look at your avatar and I say to myself: Self, I wonder who would win that fight, but I'd REALLY like to be there with a camera when the black wolf and the Great White Finn rumble. Just ribbin ya, buddy. shockedshockedgringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't smile until Christmas! eek

Makes me glad I opted out of teaching at the last minute. I like to smile a lot. smilesmile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard somewhere you do requests. smile Could we see it in b/w?

IMO while it is a very cool shot, that glare in the wolf's left eye keeps me from being drawn into them. It just seems to me that their is too much(maybe wrong angle of)light to go with the desired effect of the background. Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the large canvas. It creates a lot of nothingness, if that's a word. The drama comes from the eyes coming out of the nothingness. There are lot's of "wolf people" that would love to have that hanging on the wall.

Very nice work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wolf. Finn. Hmmmmmmm. Note the Finn's got the same little region of glare in the same part of the eye as the wolf. Coincidence? gringrin

Jameson, I'd be a lot more likely to photoshop out the little bit of reflective glare in the eye than to turn it B&W. For me, it's those wild orange eyes that rivet the attention. It made me shiver when the wolf was looking at me from a few yards away, and it makes me shiver still. I never even noticed the reflection because every time I see any version of this image I'm taken right back to that moment. Thanks so much for catching that.

3402517207_05dcd95eea_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I look at the eyes of the wolf and then I look at your avatar and I say to myself: Self, I wonder who would win that fight

Good question. Who would win between a black wolf and a ummmm....Grey Wolf grin Just funnin' with ya Ken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very menacing. Its a scary version of my black lab!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Steve, I am just a regular human being and I think that it is awesome. I think a crop half way between what the picture is and what your avtar is would work great! As usual though you have done a great job with the camera!!! I don't know if it is standing there ready to attack me or standing there to let me know that I am not welcome. Great picture! Thanks for sharing! Take care and N Joy the Hunt././Jimbo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't decide. I think the avatar looks more intense because it is sharper. The comp looks fine.

Did you pet him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't decide. I think the avatar looks more intense because it is sharper. The comp looks fine.

Did you pet him?

I can't sharpen it much more. It printed quite nicely, though it looks softer for some reason online.

Pet her? Are you kidding me? Wolves bite Canon shooters harder than Nikon shooters bite Canon shooters! winkwink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very cool. The glare is a hard one for me. I remember an art teacher in high school telling me no glare in the eyes means the animal is dead. It is bright in the first one and looks good without it, but I think some glare is needed. Have you tried the picture with a little bit more face out, not much at all, and a hint of ears or the tips of the ears showing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When are those wolves most active?

Me and Micpic need to head up that way with our blinds and a couple bags of those Beggin' Strips thingys to toss at 'em when they won't close the distance.

Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Hwood. I have tried it with a bit more detail. The more ear/outline detail that shows, the less menacing and more intimate it looks.

I like it equally both ways for different reasons, if you know what I mean.

And please don't take me wrong in what I'm about to say, anyone, but I struggle to take nature images that appeal to most men. Almost all of my nature work is based on instinct and emotion, and for some reason it tends to appeal to women more than men. In this case, I think the implied menace is more of an attraction for men.

Dang. I can't believe I just made that distinction. Generalizations are almost always wrong to some degree (how's that for a generalization?)

Don't kill me for it, please. shockedshockedshocked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   NSA To Provide "Smoking Gun" Proof Obama Spied On Trump Mar 24, 2017 5:43 AM   Yesterday, Republican Devin Nunez Nunes held an explosive press conference outside the White House in which he told reporters that communications from the Trump team were picked up and disseminated within the government during the 2016 campaign.  Not surprisingly, the comments ruffled some liberal feathers and the mainstream media launched an immediate smear campaign calling for Nunes to resign his post immediately.  Now, according to Fox News sources, congressional investigators expect that a potential “smoking gun” from the NSA establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee as early as tomorrow.   The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.   The FBI hasn’t been responsive to the House Intelligence Committee’s request for documents, but the National Security Agency is expected to produce documents to the committee by Friday. The NSA document production is expected to produce more intelligence than Nunes has so far seen or described – including what one source described as a potential “smoking gun” establishing the spying.   Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretappedhim in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.   The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.   Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing. If true, of course, this could put a 'slight' taint Obama's claim of a "scandal free" eight years in the White House.   **snip**   .........If Nunes is correct, and Trump was being wiretapped for reasons having nothing to do with Russia, that entire narrative falls apart, and the press will now have to spend the next few weeks building up an entirely new narrative to "justify" why Trump was being wiretapped on Obama's watch.   Link     Delicious...  
    • My wife and I like to float down the Crow from Rockford to the Mississippi. Hardly anyone on the river except Bald Eagles. Found some nice chicken of the woods mushrooms last summer.
    • Trump got the information from Nunes. Nunes heads the House intel committee, but Nunes also was a member of Trump's transition team. Nunes then fed information to Trump (information that apparently nobody else on the intelligence committee has) about incidental observation of Trump and his transition team (a team that includes Nunes himself). 
    • A better question would be are you right?  Even the articles you link to don't really support your "most likely" assertions so you have to resort to everything is a lie as evidence, like Donald's twitter, and anyone that doesn't believe your alternative facts is an Obama luvin' librul. 
    • What projects have you worked on? Big or small lets see um. Anything, guns, boats, cars, Decoys.    I had fun reworking a few old Harley Golf carts. Didn't have any digital before shots to post. The carts I got were in very bad shape. Had to do a lot of fiberglass body work on them and some mechanical work to get them running. Just used boat seats as I didn't want to throw a bunch of cash at reworking the old seats and one cart had no seats at all when I got it. I took all the big chrome front bumper and bag bars off and glassed over the holes. Everyone had cracks in the front nose cones and rear ends. Not perfect but fun. Top picture is one of the nicer ones I started reworking.
    • Do you have any thoughts about what state you're heading to for this?  CO is draw only but there are lots of decent options available with 0 points. MT had leftover tags which is good because you missed the deadline already. WY has options you could draw. ND has passed. NM passed. UT not a good option with no points I think. ID may have some options but not certain. SD and NE may have some good options but I've never hunted either.   That's some basic info on states. Once you pick a state and get a tag it's really not complicated for the most part. Get elevated, glass up a muley, bed him, sneak in him without being smelled it seen, shoot him!   My son and I just found out we drew ND muley tags this year so we're pumped about that!
    • Just random ones I like. 1) Grand Marais fall. 2) HSO member Laker fishing. 3) Door County Wis.
    •   Yep and the Hawks won again!
    • Choosing 3 "best photos" is tough, but here are 3 of my favorites right now.  Cottonwood vs. Lightning Morel cluster  Pup in the snow
  • Our Sponsors