Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

Some great photo deals out there now

17 posts in this topic

Been surfing evilbay for some equip. and there's some real deals on there if you're looking to get into a DSLR.

I saw a new Canon Rebel XS for about $350-that's alot of camera for that much money. I ran one a few days ago and was very impressed.5D's for around a grand! Seeing many deals on lenses also.

A few weeks ago I picked up a new $700 Manfrotto carbon tripod for just under $200,and tonight I see someone is selling new Bogen 488RC4 ballheads for $79-or best offer! If you need a nice ballhead-pounce!

C'mon folks! Let's get the economy rolling! Whoopee!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for getting the economy rolling. I'm in business, after all. gringringrin

Thanks for the heads-up, buddy. Ya gotta love evilbay and some of the used photo gear boards. They consistently reward the discerning shopper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, if a person was interested in going DSLR, but can't afford all the fancy equip you guys have shocked the Rebel XS would be a good choice? Is there such a thing as a decent larger lens that can be had for under a grand?

Love looking at all the great photos you guys post so much that I'm ashamed of my p&s

Cybershot. Had a pretty decent SLR set-up before everything went digital, but now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DonBo, the XS is capable of taking superb images. For a long lens around $1,000, take a look at the Sigma 150-500 OS (optical stabilization). Really nice image quality with that lens. Going supertelephoto has a pretty strong learning curve, mostly surrounding learning how to steady the lens so your images aren't blurry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the OS is necessary with anything over, say, 400mm? I know some guys on here hand hold some pretty big lenses. Is that how you get away with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OS (or Canon's image stabilization or Nikon's vibration reduction) is a key when handholding larger glass. When using long glass that's not stabilized, I rarely shoot handheld, most often opting for a monopod or a tripod. In fact, a stabilized supertelephoto shot off a monopod is a deadly combination.

Canon's 500mm weighs 8 pounds, which puts it in the iffy category for handholding. You've got to be strong to do it. After yesterday, my left deltoids were letting me know all about it.

We were basically running and gunning, hopping out of the vehicle when we saw grab shot opportunities of wildlife, so I ended up taking off the monopod so it'd be easier to get the kit in and out of the vehicle in a hurry. Most times I'd be shooting that glass off the monopod or, if we were set up in a static situation, off a tripod or a beanbag rest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the OS is necessary with anything over, say, 400mm? I know some guys on here hand hold some pretty big lenses. Is that how you get away with it?

Shoot at a higher shutter speed. I handhold a heavy camera and long glass for VERY long periods of time but always make sure my shutter speeds are over 1/1000s by adjusting my ISO. It certainly can be done if you have fast enough glass, good enough light and good technique.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: DonBo
Think the OS is necessary with anything over, say, 400mm? I know some guys on here hand hold some pretty big lenses. Is that how you get away with it?

Shoot at a higher shutter speed. I handhold a heavy camera and long glass for VERY long periods of time but always make sure my shutter speeds are over 1/1000s by adjusting my ISO. It certainly can be done if you have fast enough glass, good enough light and good technique.

It's that "fast enough glass" that worries me. Aren't we talking lot's of zeros now? I'm just a working guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don,

Not necessarily. The compromise is shooting at higher ISO's. If you don't have fast glass you accept a bit more noise in your images. With todays sensors, and software to deal with noise, there is no reason you can't get excellent results with slower lenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then I may just have to start perussing some of the auction type sites and see what's available.

I know you guys will steer me in the right direction if I have any questions on decisions I may have to make, right? smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely. Our perspectives all differ a bit on here, as you've already seen, because we all have our own shooting styles, but you can definitely bank on us giving you the best we got. smilesmile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don,for what it's worth the best Canon telephoto lens for the dollar bar none-in my opinion- is the 70-300mm IS. Around $450-$550 new,it has the 2 mode IS system and is sharp. Couple it with a new Rebel XS and you will have an entire rig that is capable of more than alot of photographer's abilities-for under 1K. When weight is a concern I really miss that lens!

This was a shot from my 70-300IS-it would do better than this,but it's the only one I could find quickly.

3390305061_9b788ae4a7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Canon Rebel XT as well as a XSi and they are both fantastic cameras. I use Tameron lenses with mine and they are pretty good lenses for the money. They dont have the IS options but I use my tripod quite abit and I end up with some nice images...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great info guys. And the hunt begins...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DonBo, I have the xti and use the 70-300IS Marinermagnum mentioned. Any problems I do have (and I do) are due only to my skills or lack thereof--not the lens. I'll get it, and the lens will serve me well on the journey. I can get some photos that I am very happy with, so I know the equipment capability is there. I do avoid ISO's over 400, though I think 800 should be usable with good exposure and noise reduction pp. I got some yesterday in gray conditions that are I like, but would never assume to print in large sizes. I would love the bigger stuff, but let's face it--I would need some serious weight lifting program, and the skills still need to be in place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt a decent SLR and glass will give some pretty impressive pics. What I find interesting is a fella in a local camera club I go to now and again. We have gone on some pic taking excursions where he leaves his SLR at home and out does all of us with his point and shoot. His keen eye and artistic ability allow him to work within the limits of his p&s and put out some fantastic pictures! Not sure what the point of this is but I do know the man is a artist with $150 tool or a $3000 tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot depends on the artistic abilities of the photographer. Keep the rules of photography in mind while you are taking the photos and you will become a photographer with what ever equipment you have.

I usually remember the rule of thirds... Divide your screen into thirds both horizontally and vertically. Place your subject on one of the intersecting lines instead of centering. Also make sure that the photograph keeps your eyes moving withing the picture. Photographs that have lines the lead your eyes right out of the photograph can be distracting and will not keep your interest very long...

Just a couple things to remember...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Thanks for bringing that to my attention.  I am now going to add this quick connector to the coax side and plug that into the wall plate for quick on and off.
    • I have had the Ion for two season's.  It works as good if not better than any auger I have previously owned.  The battery did not show any signs of degradation in it's second season,  I will soon see what the battery does in season three.    I use it in a 9 hole wheel house, opening 7 of the holes everytime I have gone fishing.  Additionally, I go outside the house and always pop open a half dozen extra holes.  I have never had to worry about the charge when setting up for each trip. The battery (older version) does all of those holes including reversing the auger on each hole to remove as much slush as possible.  It usually runs longer in reverse than it does drilling the hole.    I often intentionally drill old holes when I am outside to see if I can experience any lose in power or battery life and haven't had any complaints yet.   20 plus inches of ice hasn't change any of these results.   Since the new battery also works in the older version of the auger I was thinking about buying the newer battery but after some thinking about it there isn't any reason to spend the $200 for a backup that I don't currently need (knock on wood).
    • I was gonna go catfishing but then I remembered I had all my teeth 
    • Why do you guys take pictures with the bait?
       

       
    • No beer in a boat has to be the 2nd stupidest law in the history of the world next to when Wisconsin had the no trolling law   I believe he was talking more about the coverage than the care.
    • The new X battery does work with the previous model for sure.  It gives you the same +60% efficiency with either unit.
    • If you plan on reopening any holes, go with the Ion.  The Lazer blades don't reopen holes  
    • I am planing on getting an electric auger and I was trying to decide between the new ION X or strikemaster lithium lazer.  I know no one has experience with the new Ion but wondering how the older models have been holding up (does the batteries still hold a good charge) and kinda the same think with the strikemaster.  I have seen the electra lazer and not to impressed with it that is why I am wondering if the lithium is any better.  Hope you guys can help    Thanks Bobby
    • If I am thinking of this right you will plug that directly into your camera and have a coax cable running to the wall plate then? If that is the case the only thing I can think of is it will be a pain to plug and unplug the wire when you want to use it. If you are keeping it hooked up all the time then I don't see a problem.
  • Our Sponsors