Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Luck e 1

How many pounds thrust on trolling motor?

20 posts in this topic

I have a 14 foot aluminum lund with a 25 horse motor (not a four stroke).

Can anyone tell me if there is really an advantage to going to a 55lb thrust over a 40lb thrust?

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If price differnce doesn't stop you I would go for it. 40lbs will be enough, but the 55lb will be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having more thrust than you "need" is a good thing, for those few times when you might want it. But 40 lbs on a 14' boat would be a great setup, and 55 lbs would border on overkill (well, maybe not overkill because there really isn't such a thing when it comes to powering boats). But there's lots of guys out there with 55 lb motors on 16 and 17 foot console boats ..... I think you could leave a wake with a 55lb motor on your 14' boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will also depend on what you plan on using your trolling motor for and how fast you plan on going with it.

If you are going to use it to pull crank baits I would still say go bigger, the larger motor will save battery life at equal speeds. If you will only use it for back trolling, casting, or positioning while drifting then the 40 will fit your needs great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I be inclinded to agree with perchjerker. When the 40 lbs won't do it anymore the 25 hp can take over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you fish rivers go 55. Better to have too much power than not enough. Plus you will save battery life going half speed rather than 3/4 or more all day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 14 ft Lund with a 15 horse. I currently have a transom mount 36 lb thrust trolling motor. For fishing on calm days on lakes, that is generally enough. Fishing on the St. Croix it works fine. But right now, fishing on the Sippi either Pool 2 or Pool 4 it doesn't cut it. If and when I upgrade, I plan to build a mount for a bow mount trolling motor up front and put a 55 lb or better on there. Some will say I am crazy, but having more power is better than not enough.

With a 36 lb thrust motor, the best I can do on the river right now is hold in place at full throttle. Get a snag, fire up the gas motor. Get a big fish, if she runs up stream it is gonna be tough. I can maneuver the boat around in the current to keep lined up for drifts, but that is about it. I do a lot of casting too for bass and skies in the summer, so a bow mount will serve me 1000x better than my current transom mount.

I say go big, or go downstream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bow mount or transom? I think you need more thrust in a transom mount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a little 12' jonboat that I use on the city lakes & small rivers. Last year I upgraded from 36lb to 55lb thrust. I love the extra speed at full throttle but it drains my 12v battery a lot quicker. Now I carry 2 batteries for longer trips. Cutting through the milfoil is easier now & I have a lot more power in reverse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40LB works great on my 16' Lund Rebel...40LB will be fine for your 14' Lund. 55LB will just be overkill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing as overkill.....IMO. Go for all the pocketbook will allow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last time you heard someone say they wish they had a smaller trolling motor?

I went with the 55lb bow mount on my 14ft Lund. It will pull me upstream in a 3 mph current. Nice when you snag and don't want to run to the back to start the main motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
When was the last time you heard someone say they wish they had a smaller trolling motor?

Good point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last time you heard someone say they wish they had a smaller trolling motor?

I may have muttered that last night when I was installing my new one wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can never have to much power. I went from a 55lb to a 70lb on a 17 1/2' boat, and it was a big difference. Now I have a 19 1/2' boat with a 80lb. Like said above the bigger the better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucke 1 I just posted a Minkota endura 55 On hsolist 2 in perfect condition only used once before I bought a new boat. Shoot me a Email if interested...

Lukejames25@msn.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help everyone...

Trollin- I literally picked up the same model yesterday! Same price and everything.

the guy still had the box, receipt to cabelas, and everything.

The funny thing is I had been looking for the last two months. That's the way it goes.

sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a 30 on my 13' boat and it pulls it ok wish i had a 40lb.. man it really goes when you hooker up to 24 volts! goes about 6mph at wot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
    • If you guys (Dave et al) are so "end the war on drugs" you ought to be able to say what that means.  How can you advocate something that you can't, or won't, define?    
    • You dont care about his statements on the 2nd amendment or his ties with radical mooslims as you put it?  
    •   I don't reside in his district and have no power to vote for or against him so I don't spend much of my free time thinking about him.
    •   But your OK with paying for people to sit in prison?   The reason you want to keep drugs criminalized is because they are dangerous, is it not?
  • Our Sponsors