Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
wmn luv me walleye fearme

auger question

8 posts in this topic

looking on the used equipment section and thinking about buying a year old strikemaster mag 2000 8", for around 200. 1 year used but supposedly never used and still in the box. Looks like they go new for about 250 or so? I am pretty ignorant on power augers as i've been using a hand one since I moved here a couple years back and looking to get some advice and see if that is a decent auger and worth the money or any other suggestions
thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walleye,

The Strikemaster Mag 2000 is not a bad auger at all. I am assuming you are looking at the 8" model. Yes, they run about $250 in most stores new. However, if you have the extra money laying around I would personally go for the Strikemaster Lazer Augers. A little more expensive but well worth it in my opinion.

Good Luck smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Chev_trucks501 I would spend the extra cash, it is not that the Regular mag 2000 is not a great auger, it is. But, if your going to drill any amount of holes it will really wear you out less if you move up to the Lazer. Take my advice and get what ever brand, make or modlel you end up with, get it tuned shortly after you get it. I didn't do that and it ran poorly enough for long enough that I ended up needing to have the carb replaced. Since I don't now didley about 2 cycles it cost me 75 clams for parts and labor, big investment for a year old auger. This doesn't happen to every one but, it happens enough to make it worth a mention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree on the lazer upgrade. I've got one. Love it. Now, not to queer any deal for anyone, but is saving $50 enough to go without the warranty you'd get from a new one? If this one's only a year old, is the warranty transferable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise, roughly how much would the lazer run? and whats so much better about it? (sharper blade, etc
thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

never mind the above , i had one of my co-workers at work explain the 2 blade 1 blade concept and the sharpness. Sounds like it would be worth the extra money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a proud owner of a mag 2000. This is a fine machine, in my opinion, and is worth every penny. Sure, the lazer is faster, but I've found other ways to save time.

I get up earlier than the lazer boys. I sleep in my ice fishing clothes. My gear is packed in my rig the night before. I skip breakfast. I drive through red lights. I drive faster than the posted speed limit.
I pick up my minnows the night before and bait the hooks in the truck while I'm driving.

So while those lazer boys are congratulating themselves on drilling a hole through three feet of ice in 36 seconds, I'm dropping my third fish into the bucket!

200 bucks for the mag isn't a bad price, especially in like-new condition. Spend the money you save on your kids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soldier: Those are good thoughts. Plenty of guys take a strange amount of pride in cutting a hole 2.3 seconds faster than their neighbors. I like a fast-drilling auger too (I have a lazer, a Strikemaster XL-3000 with powerpoint), but that couple seconds saved doesn't make any difference in the scheme of things. And no matter how fast your drill works, someone's always faster.


------------------
Steve Foss
Superior, Wis.
stfcatfish@yahoo.com

[This message has been edited by stfcatfish (edited 11-14-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
    • Signs of life? Not sure how Dubs and the PK lets Ovi score over and over from the same spot.
    •   No argument from demorats and phoney libertarians in 2006.     Chump Shumer voted yes for a border in 2006 and again in 2010.   Q: What changes to our current immigration policy do you support? A: I support further securing our borders; prohibiting hiring of undocumented immigrants by requiring job applicants to present a secure Social Security card; creating jobs by attracting the world's best and brightest to America, and keeping them here; requiring undocumented immigrants to register with the government, pay taxes, and earn legal [status or face deportation.] Source: League of Women Voters 2010 Candidate Questionnaire , Aug 11, 2010 Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. Within 18 months, achieves operational control over U.S. land and maritime borders, including: 1) systematic border surveillance through more effective use of personnel and technology; and 2) physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful border entry. Defines "operational control" as the prevention of all unlawful U.S. entries, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, narcotics, and other contraband. Proponents support voting YES because: It is obvious there is no more defining issue in our Nation today than stopping illegal immigration. The most basic obligation of any government is to secure the Nation's borders. One issue in which there appears to be a consensus between the Senate and the House is on the issue of building a secure fence. So rather than wait until comprehensive legislation is enacted, we should move forward on targeted legislation which is effective and meaningful. Reference: Secure Fence Act; Bill H R 6061 ; vote number 2006-262 on Sep 29, 2006 http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Charles_Schumer_Immigration.htm#2006-262      
    •   And still...   A YUUGE nothing burger..   Bigley !!
    • One billion dollars for 62 of the 1500 miles of border and that is a cheap,easy section.   Oh My
  • Our Sponsors