Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BLACKJACK

Remington Wingmaster vrs Express

10 posts in this topic


Awhile back there was a thread on whether the Remington Express is as reliable as the Wingmaster - can someone point me to the thread? I couldn't find it with the search...

Was just out to the Remington web page and they said the Express had the same action as the Wingmaster, do people argee with that?

What do people think about the 1187 SPS Super
Magnum, is it reliable? I'm looking for a gun that shoots 3" shells for goose hunting and thought this would be a good one, and might as well be able to shoot the 3 1/2 inch shells.

Thanks for the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blackjack, I would definately go with something that shoots 3 1/2 inch. I picked up a Mossberg 585 this year that shoots 3 1/2 and am really impressed with the knockdown power on the flying rats. I know that they say the express has the same action as the wingmaster, but I personally don't think they are built as well.

Thats my $.02

Capt'n

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I truly believe that the only diff between the wingmaster & the express is the wood. Wingmaster's have nice looking wood and the express has plain wood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the only differences are the wood (birch vs. Walnut) and the blueing or lack thereof. I have been using a 28 gauge express for grouse the last two years and the action is the same as my 870 LW 20 gauge. I do wonder how well the lighter wood will hold up to moisture and abuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

blackjack,

i think the thread you're looking for is in thw waterfowl forum. look on page 3 under the heading of "shotguns".

------------------
Roop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blackjack,

Well the Rem 870 Wingmaster vs. the Rem 870 Express. The Wingmaster is a high gloss blued finish and a higher grade (than express) wood stock and forearm. It also has a polished bolt in the action. Some say it helps with cycling I have my doubts. The so called "guts" of both guns are exactly the same. They both run on the same principal and the parts can be used interchangably. So in the respect the Wingmaster and the Express are exactly the same.

As far as 3 1/2 inch guns go the Rem 11-87 is not too bad. I prefer Benelli over anything but that choice also carries a hefty price tag. I still shoot a 3" shell for all my hunting though. Have not found a game bird I couldn't take down with a 3"er! Hope this helps.

Good Luck smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The parts may be identical and interchangeable but the finish on said parts is night and day different. Wingmaster cycles way smoother. Have heard them shoot side by side on the trap range and there is a sound difference. I don't know what the price difference is but from what I last remember, it was more than the price of a nice looking stock. When the dull finish first came out on guns, it was more expensive than a blued gun. I've had a wingmaster for over 20 years and still going strong. Had an express for about 10 and don't see myself getting a whole lot more rounds through it. Got about 2000 rounds through a Nova and it is my gun of choice right now. Just waiting to see how it holds up in the long run. 3 1/2" shells really rock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought an 870 Express combo 10 + years ago and it's still goin strong I keep it clean but don't baby it in the field. She's got some battle scars for sure but works like a champ on deer and waterfowl.
The Express has a flat finish stock and barrel wheras the Wingmaster has a blued finish. If your worried about durabilty or value for your buck all I can say is I'm WAY SATISFIED with mine.
I used to own a Wingmaster. A good gun without a doubt !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a 11-87 SuperMagnum 3.5" last spring and love it! Very soft recoil even with 3.5" shells! Went to South Dakota for the spring snow goose hunt and the 3.5" 1 9/16oz. t's and f shot did the best job at those birds. Tha 3" shells didn't do so well as both me and my son shooting 3.5" shells took most of the snows that flew over.
Can't wait untill next spring to do that again!!

------------------
F-STOP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Youtube is the way to go. So many cool little self filmed fishing shows on there. Heck I have a channel myself where I record my fishing trips. Uncut angling is cool, I also like Peelindrag because he is out of Michigan like me. Screw those commercial filled, cheesy scripted fishing shows on tv. Times have changed in my opinion.
    • Krylon and Rustoleum both have aerosol primers for plastic.  
    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
  • Our Sponsors