Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
justinlkgb

Shallow or deep

11 posts in this topic

So the last few outing have come up empty handed. Leaves me wondering where to try? Is it better to be in the shallow or deeper parts of the lake? Max depth in the lake I am refering to is 38ft. I have been trying to get away from the crowds/cities, but don't catch anything.

What time of day is best for the depth..ie(shallow water during sunrise???)

Thanks for any tips.

Justin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been fishing very shallow, less than 4 fow under the ice and doing well on panfish. 95% of the time, those portions of the lake that are that shallow have nobody on them. Just because it is shallow, doesn't mean fish wont be there.

The fish over the deep holes have been pressured for so long all winter long. Everybody tries to fish the deep holes, but usually the fish are smaller and less active. Seek out unused water and you just might be rewarded. Edges that drop to the deep holes, expansive weed flats, shallow rocks. Give em a shot. If it doesn't work out for you, at least you didn't do the same thing you have been doing for a while and coming up empty handed. You can eliminate water each time out if you take that approach to your fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I grew up on this lake, so I am thinking i have home field adv, but no go. I am trying to target areas around 10-15 feet or so where a I can remember weeds growing in the summer. Maybe I will try on top of them or shallower rather than the deep side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you fishing for? If sunnys I would says shallow, if crappies then shallow can work for sure but there are some big schools of fish in the deeper holes on most lakes. Seems to me the deep crappies bite best at night, if I were fishing crappies during daylight I would try to find somewhere other than the deep basin areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been catching panfish lately in 5ft of water. Both sunnies and crappies. You have to be over weeds! Find the weeds and find fish!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing to consider this time of year is the spawn. If you know were your panie's like to go to spawn, connect the dots between where they were to where they will be. Look for outside or inside corners or contures along that route. Something that may hold them up a little, like a sunken island or point, or better yet a weedbed, like milfoil or curly leaf. Drill and search.

With the new water from the runoff and snow melt, the deep water holes loose the primary reason for fish to be there. O2 levels are going to begin to even out and fish will roam again.

Drill and search. You will find them eventualy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caught a limit last night in 27 ftw,they haven't moved yet in each central Minnesota as yet,plus it was -8 last night,too darn cold for Feb 23rd!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caught a limit last night in 27 ftw,they haven't moved yet in each central Minnesota as yet,plus it was -8 last night,too darn cold for Feb 23rd!!!

There are fish that will stay shallow all winter long. Crappies included. Seach for green weeds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah its heating up on here now. I will be trying shallow on the next outing. With regard to structure, whats better than another.

I primarily fish for pannies, I don't eat fish, so I always catch and release the challenge is beating me this year.

Also on a side note, how accurate is the I finder GPS? I was out on a lake this weekend, and it said I should be in 35ft and I was in 16ft. Seemed like it was 50feet or so off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: bassphish2005
caught a limit last night in 27 ftw,they haven't moved yet in each central Minnesota as yet,plus it was -8 last night,too darn cold for Feb 23rd!!!

There are fish that will stay shallow all winter long. Crappies included. Seach for green weeds.

You got it Buddy! Green is GOLD!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors