Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
merkman

MnDNR Speared Muskie Citations

50 posts in this topic

The other thread has been locked but here is the offical response from the MnDNR.

Quote:

From: Patty Holt <Patty.Holt@dnr.state.mn.us>

To: merkman

Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:46:21 AM

Subject: Spearing muskie citations

I found three citations for this violation in the last 10 years.

Patty Holt

Arrests & Confiscations Supervisor

Division of Enforcement

651-355-0162

www.patty.holt@dnr.state.mn.us

>>> merkman <merkman> 2/11/2009 2:16 PM >>>

May be you can help me by either answering this question or directing me to someone who can.

How many citations have been given out in MN by MNDNR officials for individuals spearing muskies in the last 10 years?

Thank You

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One was issued for a fish speared from Lake Miltona in 2007. Another was from the Ottertail, Mn area in 2005. Anyone know any info on the third citation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One was issued for a fish speared from Lake Miltona in 2007. Another was from the Ottertail, Mn area in 2005. Anyone know any info on the third citation?

Interesting, are these lakes on the banned list right now?

I can ask for more clarification on the 3 that were found if that helps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Spearing is allowed on Miltona and Otter tail. Ottertail has special regs. (min 30 inches posession limit 1) Lots of big fish taken there this winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty tough to be able to spear out there with them regulations!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Spearing is allowed on Miltona and Otter tail. Ottertail has special regs. (min 30 inches posession limit 1) Lots of big fish taken there this winter.

This just gets more and more bizarre the more you dig.

So it seems, spearing was banned from "musky lakes" based on the fact that muskies may be inadvertently speared.

When you dig into the facts to get some non-biased measurable data, there were only 3 actual citations for spearing muskies in all of Minnesota over the last 10 years.

At least 2 of those 3 citations were not even on the lakes that are currently "protected".

I will be conservative here

15000+ spearing licenses sold per year (this number does not include kids or seniors who spear) X 10 years = 150,000 licenses issued in 10 years

Out of those 150,000 chances only 3 citations were given over the last 10 years.

WOW

That is .002 percent of the spearers over the last 10 years.

Or sport is being banned on “muskie lakes” for actions that have citations of less than 2 thousandths of a percent of the total licenses issued and we the ones being accused of being selfish for not sharing the lakes, since there are plenty of other places to spear.

WOW, That is all I can say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

Our sport is being banned on “muskie lakes” for...

IMO spearing is banned from "muskie lakes," because a few too many folks speared too many muskies on "accident." Too many poachers back in the day said they "accidentally" speared a muskie, when they knowingly poached it. Thus we have the MYTH that it isn't possible to tell the difference between pike and muskies while spearing.

I have heard some second hand reports about the closing of Lake Minnetonka to spearing. It seams that someone speared a 50" muskie, and than the lake was closed to spearing. I can't really say if that is the whole story, or even the true story. It would be interesting to know how many spearing citations were issued on the "muskie lakes" the ten years before they were closed to spearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Spearing is allowed on Miltona and Otter tail. Ottertail has special regs. (min 30 inches posession limit 1) Lots of big fish taken there this winter.

The article I read didn't state specifically Ottertail Lake, but the offending parties were all from the Ottertail area.

30 INCH MINIMUM! Wow, I've never heard of that one before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Otter Tail is a great lake for big pike. I'm not exactly certain why the 30-inch regulation is on the lake. There is a very healthy perch population in the lake so they have plenty of forage. The water is crystal clear and I spent a lot of time the winters of 07 and 08 on the lake sight fishing for perch in 8-10 FOW and I saw some some monster gators come through. I've also seen some dandy's in the summer when walleye fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least 2 of those 3 citations were not even on the lakes that are currently "protected".

I guess after thinking of it to be fair it only makes sense, since there are very few darkhouses on those lakes.

The big question I have now is:

How many citations have been given out in MN by MNDNR officials for individuals harvesting illegal muskies via angling in the last 10 years?

I will go and dig around some more.

I will post results here when they come in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with them banning us from muskie lakes. I think its a good thing so we dont have to worry about other worry about us out ther eon the lakes. I think we have alot of lakes in Minnesota that we can spear that we dont need these lakes to spear on!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with them banning us from muskie lakes....

Having spent most of this past winter enjoying spearing on a muskie lake, my opinion is drastically different than BassnSpears. Darn near feel insulted that another spear chucker doesn't want me to spear on a lake that I just showed that I could spear on WITHOUT spearing muskies. Sounds like an idea to "dumb-down" the system for the dumbest of people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with those who don't want to take that chance, keeping off those lakes, but it should be a personal decision not something imposed on people.

You shouldn’t be forced to spear on muskie lakes, and you shouldn’t be forced not to spear on muskie lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with them banning us from muskie lakes. I think its a good thing so we dont have to worry about other worry about us out ther eon the lakes. I think we have alot of lakes in Minnesota that we can spear that we dont need these lakes to spear on!

Should we quit driving because we might speed or run over someone? Don't use guns because you might shoot someone?

Come on.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not voicing my opinion whether spearing is good or bad one way or the other, though I used to spear and support the right to do so legally. My question is more whether you think that the number of issued citations is an accurate barometer of how many muskies get speared? I mean, whether accidental or accidently on purpose, do you really think a spearer will turn tehmselves in that speared a muskie, knowing it is illegal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did some research on this as well Merk and found that the only Muskie poaching violations were written to spearers, Ive looked for others but no luck, granted I did not call enforcement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like being singled out for any reason, It's like saying blue cars can't drive on I 94.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My question is more whether you think that the number of issued citations is an accurate barometer of how many muskies get speared? I mean, whether accidental or accidently on purpose, do you really think a spearer will turn tehmselves in that speared a muskie, knowing it is illegal?

I think it is one way to show measurable non biased numbers.

I agree it does not show the "whole picture"

If we compare these numbers to the number of angling citations given it should give a very good representation. I say this, since I can agree that I don't think most anglers or spearers will turn themselves in for taking illegal Muskie, knowing it is illegal.

It is kind of like two people weighing them selves on a bathroom scale.

The actual weight of the scale may be off by 20 lbs, but if 2 people weigh themselves on that same scale, then come back 2 weeks later and weigh themselves on that same scale again, it is easy to see how much weight either person lost. You might not know their true actual weight but the actual weight lost is accurate.

I agree it is not the "best" way to measure it. I also don't think you could ever get a perfect measurement. So you have to go with the best you have.

I will believe actual citations or MN DNR formally reported incidents way before listening to stories about somebody’s uncles dogs cousin who supposedly did something wrong.

Maybe there is a better way of measuring it; if there is, I am interested in knowing what that may be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did some research on this as well Merk and found that the only Muskie poaching violations were written to spearers, Ive looked for others but no luck, granted I did not call enforcement.

Post your results and cite your sources.

I am interested in seeing these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not voicing my opinion whether spearing is good or bad one way or the other, though I used to spear and support the right to do so legally. My question is more whether you think that the number of issued citations is an accurate barometer of how many muskies get speared? I mean, whether accidental or accidently on purpose, do you really think a spearer will turn tehmselves in that speared a muskie, knowing it is illegal?

You have to look at it like any minor crime, there are more people that do it than ones that get caught. That goes for everything (speeding, stealing, etc) including people that poach muskies by spear or hook and line. Why do they always have to use spearing as an example?

I would bet (based on numbers and statistics) that there are many more illegal muskies taken by hook and line than by spear. There are many more anglers than spearers so it would stand to reason that a few percent of each is engaging in illegal activity. They always say, "There are always a few bad apples..." They are right but there are always a few bad apples in the anglers as well, so with that reasoning nobody should be allowed to fish musky waters because they are such a precious resource that we can't afford to waste. Of course this is a ridiculous notion, but I hate this argument.

A poacher obviously doesn't care about the laws, so making more isn't going to stop them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TIP NEWS

Poacher fined $6,000, jailed

Sept. 27, 2005

DNR Reports

A Detroit Lakes man has plead guilty to poaching charges in Becker County District Court.

Minnesota conservation officers ticketed xxxxxxx, 30, last October with three gross misdemeanors after a search warrant was served. xxxxx admitted to illegally spearing a muskie, taking deer over the limit and shooting a 500 pound black bear without the required game tag.

xxxxxpled guilty Sept. 6 to all three counts, paid $5,100 in restitution, was sentenced 365 days in jail (320 days stayed), was fined $3,000 plus court costs ($2,000 stayed). He was placed on two years probation with condition that he doesn't hunt or fish anywhere in the world for two years. He lost his hunting and fishing licenses for five years in Minnesota and the other 17 states that comprise the Wildlife Violator Compact for five years. Compact states include Minnesota, Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. xxxxxx will be immediately remanded to jail and serve the entire sentence if he violates any provisions of his probation.

xxxxxxs father, Walter Robert xxxxxx, 57, Frazee, was also charged in the incident and pled guilty to three misdemeanor counts of possessing an untagged gill net, possessing ducks taken illegally and possessing untagged waterfowl. He was fined $500.

“A CO has only one set of eyes,” said State Conservation Officer Chris Vinton of Detroit Lakes. “I cover 650 square miles. If the public out here is concerned about natural resources, every person is another set of eyes that can help catch those violating the law.”

Anyone witnessing a wildlife violation is encouraged to contact the nearest conservation officer or call the toll-free Turn In Poachers hotline at 1-800-652-9093.

DNR Site

Field Notes: TIP Line Rings

A 14-year-old boy shot his first buck, an eight-pointer, from a roadway at the urging of his father. A county worker speared a muskie in a ditch. From inside his residence, a rural homeowner shot a trophy deer as it fed from a pile of corn.

I had another one but I cant find it then we cant forget the recent one last month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Tomorrow we will be back at it
    • I am giving it a last hurrah tomorrow. Sorry I haven't been able to check in here much. I have hardly been able to get out this year between work, a baby at home, and a recent trip out of the country for a relative's wedding.    Last time I was out I had a real nice Tom within 20 yards after a very long standoff. I think I screwed it up by rushing myself a bit. He stood around 50 yards out literally strutting back and forth like someone had drawn a line in the mud that he wouldnt cross. He must not have wanted to fight with the strutter decoy we had out. He did that for 45 minutes to an hour and finally came our way after a hen led him towards us.    They came past us but were outside the decoys and angling slightly away from us. Then the tom turned and started angling straight at the strutter decoy. That meant he was basically quartering to me and when he was 15-17 yards or so out I drew because in the back of my mind i was thinking if he kept moving that way and past the decoy he would quickly be in a spot I would have had no shot.   In hindsight I think he had realized (once he got close enough) that he would have been able to whoop up on the decoy and he was coming in to do just that. I probably should have waited to see, but I didn't and right as I hit the backwall of my draw his head popped up on alert and he turned around and walked straight away knowing something wasn't quite right. I could have easily shot at him at 20 yards but he was facing away and I just didn't feel comfortable. I am confident I would have hit my mark but I didn't like shooting at something walking straight away when I am not experienced with bow hunting turkeys.   I know some people will say that I should have shot, but I have been bow hunting for awhile and never wounded anything because of a poor shot or poor shot selection, so I didn't want that to be a first. Hopefully I get a shot at redemption tomorrow!
    • Way to go team!! I sure took the avg score down with my jake
    • nice story, fishing has a way of easing the pains we have. even when we hurt like crazy when done for the day we are looking forward to the next outing.
    • way to go, guys yep, the toms not about to give up even though its close to closing time have seen several strutters the past couple weeks and heard gobbles yesterday while fishing
    • great job. makes it 5 for 5 for team 5 congrats on a nice tom, 57 and that willl give our team score a boost
    • One More Cast      Photo by:  Roger Abraham   If any of you out there are regular readers of my tales, you have followed my recent struggles with back and knees.  I can’t put a name to this drive I have to be on the stream as of late.  It borders on obsession. I guess in my mind if I am healthy enough to fish the world is right with me and I am not getting old and feeble.      Today I was a witness to that I am not the only one.  Lots of anglers and hunters live to go out into the outdoors. .  It is what drives them.  It makes them feel alive.  It is their passion.  I told my fishing buddy Abe today my thoughts.  I told him how I was feeling a little old.  I guess my 60th birthday coming up next month makes me feel mortal.  Abe laughed and said I was a young buck compared to him.  Abe turns 76 this year.     Abe told me tales about catching big trout in tiny streams in Wisconsin and out west.  The twinkle in his eye when he reminisced I had seen before in many trout anglers.      We fished a stretch for 2 hours.  I sat down and rested often.  Abe kept on fishing. He got hung up in a box elder branch and lost a lure.  Abe told me box elders trees were his nemesis when he fished.   He asked me which tree was my kryptonite.  I told him, "ones with branches."  We both had a chuckle and continued fishing.   I thought to myself this guy is really driven.  I hope I am like him at 76.     We got to the vehicle and Abe wanted to continue fishing.  Abe’s waders sprang a leak earlier and he fell in the water a couple times.  He was quite wet.  He wanted to change in to dry clothes before we continue.  Abe peeled off his wet shirt and there were two things stuck to his chest.  He could tell by my questioning look he needed to tell me what was up.     Abe told me he had been having heart problems lately and he was supposed to be wearing a heart monitor.  He left it in the car because he was afraid of getting the electronics wet.  Here I have been whining about being old and the guy I was fishing with left his heart monitor in his vehicle.      Abe reassured me that he was in no danger and he could continue fishing.  I started brainstorming on a place to fish where it was not so hard walking.  Now that I knew he was not as healthy as he looked I wanted an easy place to fish.  I knew the place and it was upstream 5 miles.     We arrived at the well manicured field.  It looked like a golf green.  I picked the area because the farmer kept sheep and goats on the land and the weeds and brush were gone because of the goats.  We walked and fished.     Abe told tales of the old days and of fish lost and landed.  I walked a little forward to fish and looked back to check up on Abe.  What I saw when I looked back scared me and I immediately asked Abe if he was ok.  Abe was laying flat on the ground face down.  I thought the worst and he could tell by my face.  He told me to calm down.  His back was acting up and he needed to straight it out and that was the best way to do it.   We fished a little bit more and he took a photo of me.  He liked the lighting. He told me it captured the essence of trout fishing.  He did not have a camera.  I let him use mine.  He was not camera savvy and needed an impromptu lesson on how to use it.   We drove to his car and we talked about our love of the outdoors. We shook hands and headed our separate ways and promised to fish again soon.  As I drove home I smiled and thought about how I am going to be when I am 76.  I hope I am like Abe and my eyes still twinkle when I talk of chasing trout and I am still driven to make one more cast.
    • The past week has had me having multiple close calls and missing a brute at 45 yards.  Tonight I talked my dad to give it another try and there were birds in the field when we got there.  Birds ended up leaving as we tried to sneak in.  A short 20 minutes later they were back and we watched and worked the big group of toms and hens for more than 2 hours before we got one to commit.  Dad shot him with his 20 gauge at 48 yards,(this thing shoots an awesome pattern).  The 3 year old was down and only flopped a few times.   Nice 1+ inch spurs, 10" beard and heavy.  A good evening for sure!
    • Sorry to disappoint guys, but this tom was not my first bird of the season. Apparently that's part of the rules. The score won't count towards the team. I don't have any measurements for the jake I shot so we will have a zero from me.    At least my freezer is full. 
  • Our Sponsors