Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BobT

Automotive climate control

10 posts in this topic

After starting a different thread about my truck thermostat, I decided to start this discussion. I bought my 2001 F-150 new in the fall of 2000. I have been very pleased with this truck all these years with maybe two exceptions. I’ll talk about one of them.

Probably my most prominent disappointment with this vehicle has been climate control. Don’t get me wrong. It works but just not up to my expectations. The cab heater has never really put out the kind of heat I have come to expect from my vehicles and I have not been impressed by the A/C either. I rarely use A/C because I don’t care much for conditioned air but on those occasions when I have used it, it really came up short.

Be that as it may, one feature that many manufacturers employ is to program the A/C compressor to engage when blend or defrost positions are selected. In other words, if you want to move air across your windshield, it will be conditioned. In the fall when the outside air isn’t hot, I like to use the blend position to defog my windshield but I don’t like the idea of wasting gas to run the A/C compressor. I’m not looking to cool my cab, just defog the windshield. Besides, the colder air from the defroster now causes condensation on the windshield, which is what I’m trying to eliminate by having the air blowing on the windshield in the first place. To counter this effect, I’m forced to turn up the temperature setting of the defroster. It’s like running your furnace and air conditioner at the same time.

I have been told that the reason for this is so that the compressor runs occasionally throughout the winter months to help keep things lubricated. I have a hard time buying the lubrication theory. I have some window air conditioners that we occasionally use during the hottest summer days. They are used just for a few nights from maybe late July through August but then sit idle for ten months of the year. I don’t plug them in and run them occasionally throughout the winter and yet they fire up and work just fine year after year. The same is true for our basement dehumidifier, which sits idle for about 8 months every year. I have never had a problem with these units.

Another reason I don’t buy it is because my 2001 Chrysler gives me the option to turn my A/C on at my discretion. The compressor does not run simply by selecting the blend or defrost positions and yet the system works just fine when I need it.

Can’t we end-users at least have one position where we can move natural outside air across our windshield?

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not true you chrysler compressor does run when you turn your defroster on. Being a former dealer tech, chrysler has numerous issues with its air cond. and it is true about the luberication issues. That is the main reason they do kick on with the defrost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your home equipment isn't subjected to the extremes that you vehicles equipment is subject to as well. Just the temp extremes they are subject to makees you wonder how they last as long as they do. Then add the fact that the compressors are slammed on at any number of different RPM's and they are subected to engine and road vibrations and there starts to be a huge difference in between the two systems! Then account for the rubber hoses and all of the gaskets that need to be used to make it serviceable and to account for engine/body movement and they will not be anywhere near as reliable as your home system. Although some manufactures have nailed reliability on there HVAC system, many have not!!

The conditioned air is dry air so it helps defog a windshield that much faster. I think you will find that most newer vehicles will get at least the same or better fuel economy running the a/c as they would with the windows down. I don't think fuel economy is as good of an argument as it once may have been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with what was said. If your looking to add to your economy, you would have to drive with your a/c off, and your windows up, not easy to do in the summer. I am pretty sure all models from the 90's until today cycle the compressor atleast for all defrost modes, and for two reasons. One, just to cycle the compressor and the oil into the entire system, to run the clutch so it doesnt just build up with rust, and as Airjer said, the evaporater removes moisture from the air in temps above 35 degrees, to assist in defrost mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The temperature extremes and weather, moisture, snow dust, dirt, etc. would promote issues that I didn't consider with my window units. Good points. Cycling the unit throughout the winter occasionally through the defrost selection is one way to do it so we don't forget to do it ourselves. Okay, makes sense.

I still have a problem with air conditioned air at moderate temps. What I'm referring to are those times when it's 60 degrees outside and humid and all I need to is to move some outside air across the windshield to defog. Outside air will do this just fine. When the air conditioner starts to pump out cold air at 50 or 60 degrees it causes the window to get cold and that's what caused the window to fog up in the first place. Being of the type that prefers to avoid conditioned air because it bothers my sinuses, I'd rather use outside air to do the job.

This is when I think it would be nice if the compressor only cycled automatically in defrost mode but not in blend mode.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About all you can do is unplug the compressor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disconnect the low or high pressure switch and then don't complain when the front seal on the comprssor leaks and you have a bigger bill to pay. I have an 01 supercrew that throws heat to no end. You may have a blend door problem if you are not getting enough heat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, remember the heat is waste heat anyway. If it isn't going into the Cab, it's going out the radiator. The AC is the only excess. But the AC running also drys out your carpet and interior much faster when you get it wet or snowy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you need to upgrade to a 1974 model wink !

Just open the wing windows and it is all good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you need to upgrade to a 1974 model wink !

Just open the wing windows and it is all good.

Now that's the best statement I've seen yet.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
    • Pick up a Jake morning.  Not going help the team score, if at all.  But it sure will taste good.
    • It's been very quiet in the woods the past few days.  Some gobbling this morning.
  • Our Sponsors