Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Deitz Dittrich

BassMaster 11:00 Update...

38 posts in this topic

unofficial standings as of 11am their time.

Aaron Martens: 14-13

McClelland: 13-8

Dave Wolak: 10-8

Jami Fralick: 10-4

Dean Rojas: 9-8

Jordon: 9-3

Kevin Wirth: 8-12

Skeet Reese: 8-0

Edwin Evers: 8-0

Boyd Duckett: 7-2

Bryan Schmidt: 6-0

Fred Roumbanis: 6-0

Greg Pugh: 5-11

Brent Chapman: 5-8

Scott Rook: 5-3

Bobby Lane: 4-10

Randy Howell: 3-14

Terry Scroggins: 3-8

Mark Davis: 3-8

Terry Fitzpatrick: 3-7

Timmy Horton: 3-0

Bernie Schultz: 3-0

Matt Herren: 3-0

Brian Snowden: 3-0

Alton Jones: 2-8

Shaw Grigsby: 2-8

Todd Faircloth: 2-5

David Williams: 2-0

Kenyon Hill: 2-0

Rick Clunn: 1-8

Ken Baumgardner: 1-6

Michael Iaconelli : 1-4

Mike Burns: 1-0

Steve Kennedy: 1-0

Waine Pittman: 1-0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where's KVD on this list? Still Zero?

I looked at a bunch of photos from the practice days and preview week, and it looked like a lot of people were going to be fishing very shallow cover. Southern backwaters are a different animal, that is for sure.

Clunn looks to only have one fish as well huh. Hope that shallow water tactic works for him. They should all be in Riverpros if they knew what was good for them down there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

new update.

12:10 p.m. ET

Unofficial standings as of 12:10 p.m. ET:

Aaron Martens: 17-1

Scott Rook: 15-4

Jami Fralick: 14-12

Mike McClelland: 13-8

Bill Lowen: 12-8

Dave Wolak: 10-8

Edwin Evers: 10-5

Dean Rojas: 9-8

Fred Roumbanis: 9-8

Kelly Jordon: 9-7

Skeet Reese: 9-4

Kevin Wirth: 8-12

Boyd Duckett: 8-7

Bobby Lane: 8-1

Mark Davis: 8-1

Greg Pugh: 7-15

Brent Chapman: 7-8

Matt Herren: 7-8

Terry Fitzpatrick: 6-9

Bryan Schmidt: 6-1

Davy Hite: 6-1

Rick Clunn: 6-1

Terry Scroggins: 5-8

Brian Snowden: 4-1

Shaw Grigsby: 4-1

Randy Howell: 3-14

Ken Baumgardner: 3-9

Bernie Schultz: 3-1

Steve Kennedy: 3-1

Timmy Horton: 3-1

Alton Jones: 2-8

Todd Faircloth: 2-5

David Williams: 2-1

Kenyon Hill: 2-1

Michael Iaconelli: 1-4

Mike Burns: 1-1

Waine Pittman: 1-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another update.

It was just a matter of time before Scott Rook finished out his limit. It appears as if that final fish was in the 3-pound range.

He's now in the lead with 18-5, bumping Fralick to second (17-10) and Martens to third (17-1).

No other big moves taking place at the time.

— Steve Bowman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to remember that these are weights guessed by observers from the back of the boat. Who knows if they can even judge a fish?!? And maybe the reason there isn't any info coming from Hack, Klein and KVD might be due to technical difficulties!?! Go Rook!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Fralick! I think it would be cool if a Midwest boy that fishes the mighty Mississippi a lot won the Classic.

Hester.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unofficial standings from the 2009 Bassmaster Classic

Updates from BASSTrakk as of 2/20/2009 1:15 p.m. EST

By The Editors of

Bassmaster.com

(Archive)

Updated: February 20, 2009, 1:16 PM ET

Comment

Email

Print

2009 Classic archive | Photo galleries | Classic blog | Live coverage

Rank Angler Weight (lbs-oz) # of fish

1 Scott Rook 18-05 5

2 Jami Fralick 17-10 5

3 Aaron Martens 17-01 5

4 Fred Roumbanis 15-00 5

5 Dave Wolak 14-00 5

6 Boyd Duckett 13-10 5

7 Mike McClelland 13-08 5

8 Edwin Evers 12-10 5

9 Bill Lowen 12-08 5

10 Bobby Lane 12-00 4

11 Dean Rojas 11-08 5

12 Kelly Jordon 11-05 5

13 Randy Howell 10-06 4

14 Kevin Wirth 10-04 5

15 Alton Jones 9-14 5

16 Matt Herren 9-08 4

17 Skeet Reese 9-04 3

18 Brian Snowden 8-05 3

19 Greg Pugh 8-03 5

20 Davy Hite 8-00 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im glad too see that im not the only nut that keeps refreshing my page every minute waiting/hoping for there to be a new update!!! I am looking at the Classic Blog and the Unofficial Standings on the Bassmaster homepage!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rank Angler Weight # of fish

1 Michael Iaconelli 20-10 5

2 Scott Rook 20-05 5

3 Boyd Duckett 17-10 5

3 Jami Fralick 17-10 5

5 Aaron Martens 16-01 5

6 Fred Roumbanis 15-00 5

7 Kelly Jordon 14-13 5

8 Bobby Lane 14-05 5

8 Edwin Evers 14-05 5

10 Mike McClelland 14-01 5

11 Bill Lowen 14-00 5

11 Dave Wolak 14-00 5

13 Brian Snowden 13-10 5

14 Alton Jones 13-06 5

14 Randy Howell 13-06 5

16 Skeet Reese 12-15 5

17 Bryan Schmidt 12-00 5

17 Mike Burns 12-00 5

19 Dean Rojas 11-08 5

20 Davy Hite 11-00 4

20 Greg Hackney 11-00 5

20 Steve Kennedy 11-00 5

23 Brent Chapman 10-14 5

24 Rick Clunn 10-06 5

25 Kevin Wirth 10-04 5

26 Jay Evans 10-02 5

27 David Williams 10-00 5

28 Mark Davis 9-08 5

28 Matt Herren 9-08 4

30 Todd Faircloth 9-03 4

31 Greg Pugh 8-03 5

32 Shaw Grigsby 7-08 5

33 Bernie Schultz 7-02 3

34 Timmy Horton 7-00 4

35 Kenyon Hill 6-12 4

36 Waine Pittman 6-10 3

37 Ish Monroe 6-09 2

37 Ken Baumgardner 6-09 4

37 Terry Fitzpatrick 6-09 3

40 Casey Ashley 6-05 3

41 Terry Scroggins 5-15 5

42 Kim Bain-Moore 3-13 3

43 Gary Klein 3-06 2

44 Kevin VanDam 3-00 3

45 Peter Thliveros 2-00 1

46 Kotaro Kiriyama 1-05 1

47 Byron Velvick 1-00 1

Where did Ike come from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did Ike come from?

He must have found a pattern, You ever watch his city limits show the guy will get skunked all day long then he catches one fish with like an hour left and catches his limit on that exact pattern

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What points. This doens't go towards angler of the year. Kelly Jordan is way out front so far with 19-10 today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors