Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
SDPROV

LMS-520C Lowrance

10 posts in this topic

I am looking to upgrade my electronics in the boat! I am looking at the LMS-520C. Anyone with this unit care to respond good or bad. Just looking for peoples thoughts on this unit! This unit does use the navonic chips correct? Thank you Sdprov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Lms 522c, I love it. I only had one issue with it not picking up satelites, but I was using for 12 hrs straight. I have no idea if that has something to do with it. I think the only diffrence between the 520 and the 522 is the extrnal sat reciever on the 522. I use the lake master chip and it works well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the 520c last year and liked it. fishhuntwork is right the only difference between the 520 and 522 is that the 522 has internal gps. I went with the 520 so that I would have the external gps and could use one gps with two units. I don't think the 522 can share gps location, I could be wrong on that. Plus I wanted the gps close to the bow and trolling motor transducer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used 520s and like them, they will work with LakeMaster or Nav chips. The 520 is discontinued for 2009, it has been replaced by the HDS-5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 510 and a 5200 at the helm and a 520 at the bow. The lowarances are very easy to use all three have the same buttons and menus which is nice. I'd suggest the external GPS of the 520 if you decide you want to add another unit as you can share the one "puck" with two units.

If you fish a lot of shallow weedy water you may be disapointed with the 520. It seems these units are powerful enough that the struggle in the shallow weeds. ie cabbage, milfoil, coontail out to 16fow or so. The depth will start flashing and doesn't come back until your off the edge a ways. There are a few settings you can mess with to remedy but if you search other boards this issue will come up often.

Overall a good unit though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have both and i like them a vary good unit for walleye, muskie, and vary good for trolling lake you don't fish much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the 520 last year for the bow of the boat, and was able to hook up to the trolling motor ducer ,and network with the 28HD on the console, they share the same GPS antenna, so I did not have to buy the ducer or the antenna which saved me tons of cash. the 520 worked very well, and was glad I bought it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run a 520 and am happy with it. Havn't had problems in shallow weeds. Turn off the "auto" feature and you will be fine. I swear I can tell the difference between milfoil and other vegetation when reading in 12 to 16 feet of water. Perchjerker is right, it is being discontinued. I would buy the new version -the HD 5. These units will be compatible with lowrance's new sideviewing transducer that is coming out in July.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm installing a 520 tomorrow up front. Been running it for a week or so in my truck and really like it so far. Its hard to not buy a proven product at the closeout price. I bought mine at Reeds. Good deal, great service, no tax, no delivery. The main reason I bought it, is to record map data. I have a Eagle 480 up front now, that I will be retiring. I also have a LCX15 and a Hbird 997 on the dash. Its just what I needed.

Looking forward to using it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have two of them and they have a very nice screen for a 5" display. I'd bet there are some screaming deals on model-end closeouts right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Love the curvature of the antlers.   Beautiful mount!
    • Not a monster for sure but he makes the season a success. I wasnt going to be able to hunt tomorrow because of a first communion, not afternoon today because of my dads birthday, and only evenings Monday&Tuesday.  So time was limited and i am more than happy to eat jake. Here he is.
    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
  • Our Sponsors