Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
CrappiesNCats

Discussion: CPR vs Economy and other Issues

19 posts in this topic

I don't want to get into an argument but was thinking after reading the Attitudes and Albert Lea threads.

Does a struggling economy hinder catch and release attitudes and practices? Encourage people to stretch (break) the law?

Curious. its just something I have been thinking about. I know we have a huge contingency of CPR folk here, but what do you think.

and: (perhaps this belongs in a seperate thread)

what can we do to change attitudes toward CPR, especially among different/prevalent south central mn cultures? or are we best served worrying about only ourselves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first part has already been discussed in here a couple times, most recently here:

http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1698030/1

As for the second part: EDU-MA-CATION is the only way, but at the end of the day, you can't make other people do what you want and you can't teach an old dog new tricks. It may appear as a cultural thing, and it may be some extent, but there are plenty of good ol' minnesota borne and raised folks without a CPR attitude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my .02

The DNR is paid to manage the fisheries. They set limits etc...I impose my own limits such as releasing 20"+ walleyes (spawners) and eating only the 15-20" fish. That being said, I absolutely will keep my limit of 'eyes. If its gonna hurt the fishery, then the DNR isn't doing their job in setting the limits correctly.

The only other fish I eat are panfish and occasionally a few northerns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'd rather take what I need, which isn't much, rather than basing my limits on what the DNR says. I have a tough time, even with 3 or 4 people eating a limit of walleyes. I don't like to keep / freeze fish much either, good economy or not. If my money was so tight I had to keep all the fish I could, I'd be fooling myself. Every fish fillet I've put on the table myself has cost me way more than a store bought fillet or meal of anykind. Nothing wrong with keeping fish Selectively, to keep and eat, but to rely on the lake as a foodshelf, I'm not so sure I agree.

I was just thinking about apex predators such as big pike and muskies and their effects on lakes. They do a great job at balancing out of balancing (perch, sunfish, ect) out over-populated / stunted fish lower on the pyramid, per se. But I don't think they store them anywhere, like we do. Wolves don't kill and store for later either. It was just a thought. We are the ultimate apex predator, and wonder why we harvest and collect fish like we do??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
If its gonna hurt the fishery, then the DNR isn't doing their job in setting the limits correctly.

I don't buy this argument.

The only way the DNR can accurately set the correct limits for all types of fish is to have near perfect information on every lake & then tailor the limits to every individual lake based on populations, cycles, baitfish, recruitment, etc.

Can you imagine the outcry if each lake had its own limit? Yikers.

So saying "It's the limit" isn't really a valid argument. I could take my limit of pike out of Mille Lacs three times per week & probably never impact the fishery. If I did the same on small metro lakes they'd be hammered fast & take years to recover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to agree with Wade on this one Max. The DNR bases their rules on creel surveys, netting results, etc. and they do impose special regs. on certain waters as a result. You're right that no one rule can be applied to all situations but they do the best they can with what they have to work with all while trying to satisfy their clients...us.

How I choose to harvest when I go fishing impacts the DNR test results and so they make the rules accordingly. They don't make the rules by drawing from a hat. At least I hope not.

I don't feel I'm qualified to decide how many fish I can harvest and what size from a particular body of water. Therefore, I trust that the DNR is keeping tabs on the fishery and setting limits and other restrictions as needed.

Bob

Edit: I'm not strictly a C&R fisherman and so I will harvest fish when I want a meal and I may even take a few more than a meal for the freezer (within legal limits) if I happen to catch a good bite. If that means I am robbing the fishery then so be it. I enjoy eating fish and I won't apologize for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sour economy doesn't mean I go fishing more often, it means I keep more of what I catch when I DO get fishing. I'm out there to have a great time and don't generally get bothered when I come home and have a meal that doesn't have fish in it. But since I'm going fishing anyway, and am in money saving mode now, it's cheaper to keep more of those fish for meals than it is to spend more money on other things for lunch/supper at the grocery store.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone really think the DNR just pulls some numbers out of the air for what it taken from a lake? I am sure they don't know the exact numbers, but there is a system they use and it is probably pretty accurate as to how much is taken. If not we would have a pretty lousy fishery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to digress and change subjects, but this very conversation is where the 2 line bill has issues.

All of the data and harvest rates the DNR uses is mostly through creel survey data and the like. It is this reason why I am not 100% for 2 lines.

No, they do not pull numbers out of a hat to set limits.

Yes, in a perfect world each lake would be managed individually.

I love fish, therefore, I eat them! No one should feel guilty about what they harvest as long as it's w/in the limit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it affects each person differently. If I'm unemployed and hungry, you bet I will live on fish if I have to. I'd call it cashing in my rainy day fund, since I rarely keep anything now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it affects each person differently. If I'm unemployed and hungry, you bet I will live on fish if I have to. I'd call it cashing in my rainy day fund, since I rarely keep anything now.

Thats what I did at school. Now I dont keep a thing. I dont have any problem with keeping fish if you need to eat. It kept me going through some tough times and Im sure not going to feel bad about it. While I never broke a law, I did eat fish 3-4 times a week.

As long as its within the laws I have no problem. When people start stuffing the freezer and going over the limit, then its a problem.

Im sure there are a few more people out there keeping fish now, but I think most people still go fishing to have fun, not get food. There are lots of easier/more reliable ways to get some food other than fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am probably a 90% CPR type of person, the other 10% is usually because my kids want to keep their catch, we all like fish, but just not very often, or if the fish gets injured, then I will keep it, instead of sending it back to die. If I needed to live off of fishing, I think I would starve, I spend way more on fishing then I do food!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what can we do to change attitudes toward CPR, especially among different/prevalent south central mn cultures? or are we best served worrying about only ourselves?

Don't need to do much I don't think. Catch and release is huge everywhere you go, even southern MN. Most fisherman I know and that goes for almost everywhre in the state are more C&R,(actually I would call it selective harvest like In-fisherman does)than catch and keep everything.

Sometimes the C&R crowd gets a little overzealous IMO. As long as you eat what you keep and are not keeping a huge amount of fish, there is nothing wrong with keeping some for the table.

Oh and yes, I release the big ones back in the lake, and release the eaters into hot peanut oil, fish taste good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
How I choose to harvest when I go fishing impacts the DNR test results and so they make the rules accordingly. They don't make the rules by drawing from a hat. At least I hope not.

Oh yes, I wasn't saying that the DNR is pulling this stuff out of their arses. Just that I don't like hearing the argument "If the DNR says it's OK to take three pike a day & I can do that & it hurts the fishery, it's the DNR screwing up." I think folks have to use their heads based on the lake they're fishing (& I suspect folks here have better heads on their shoulders in this regard than the general population).

As for the original post, I've given it some thought. If I, personally, was laid off, I would eat more of the fish that I caught. I can't speak for others, but my 2-3 meals per year out of metro waters would definitely rise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Steve Foss,

Since you've been in this thread, I wanted to say that the pic in the Fall issue of the Boundary Waters Journal of the black wolf was fantastic. Stellar work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm up and down on CPR. I do it now more than I ever have. I have my own slot on the Croix. I keep between 16 and 20 inchers. Mainly try to stay with 18 inchers if I'm keeping any. Now, I don't need to keep a limit. A couple is fine. There are times i would keep a limit if I have had a hard time getting in my slot and get into a hot bite. I love to eat fish about once a week, sometimes a couple of times. I've kept a limit of 6, filleted 'em up and took 'em to work to have a small fish fry. They all enjoyed that. I do that at least once a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poeple do lie on creel surveys.

Soooo therefore the data collected is worthless and should be thrown away. People lie on this site about being C&R proponents too. I know plenty that would claim to support it without actually practicing.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't fish for food. that being said, nothing beats fried lake trout or a nice walleye dinner. if i get hungry enough i can always shoot a deer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Yah - great looking decoys! MJ - I'm just letting you know I'm breaking into your house and stealing your spear rack.  And mount. I found a rickety old 5 tine when I cleaned out the garage.  I might give it a try this season.
    • I can't identify any of those for sure, and certainly wouldn't recommend eating any of them.  The first pic might be some older honey mushrooms, but it's pretty tough to tell.  I've got about 8 mushrooms that I can positively id.  Beyond that, it's just not worth being wrong.  There are still some fresh hen of the woods mushrooms around the metro if you get out into some oak woods.  You can find them around the base of big mature oaks and they are pretty easy to identify.  Found about 20 on Wednesday.  Many were a little old, but was able to take 4 nice ones home.  Here's a pic of one that I left behind.
    • I'm putting it on my calendar.  Don't forget the Nord Lord trophy since it has a new home to go to. 
    • Detroit News breaks 143 year tradition, endorses Gary Johnson.   The endorsement is the first time in the paper’s 143-year history it has endorsed someone other than the Republican Party’s nominee. http://www.breitbart.com/news/detroit-news-breaks-tradition-endorses-libertarian-gary-johnson/  
    • Kind of like Trump did Monday night.
    • Gets on a bunch of talk shows. Jumps another 5 points in the polls.. This just ain't working the way it's supposed to...
    • Looks like it's unanimous then. Good thing my vote goes to Hillary since it seems everyone thinks she is the best person for the job.
    • In your situation I'd try to be standing around the time you expect the deer to show up since it sounds like your upper body will have branch cover but not lose drawing ability. I usually set up off to the side and a little behind the tree from the direction I expect the deer to come from.  That way I get the full benefit of the cover of the tree I'm in. I stand a lot though; I rarely sit.  My ears tell me quite a bit but I'm usually looking around that tree all the time and my body is close to it.  I seem to be able to get away with quite a bit of movement and am rarely at 15 feet or higher.
    • Most big spending Republicans do.
    • In the Boilermakers building;
  • Our Sponsors