Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
CrappiesNCats

Discussion: CPR vs Economy and other Issues

19 posts in this topic

I don't want to get into an argument but was thinking after reading the Attitudes and Albert Lea threads.

Does a struggling economy hinder catch and release attitudes and practices? Encourage people to stretch (break) the law?

Curious. its just something I have been thinking about. I know we have a huge contingency of CPR folk here, but what do you think.

and: (perhaps this belongs in a seperate thread)

what can we do to change attitudes toward CPR, especially among different/prevalent south central mn cultures? or are we best served worrying about only ourselves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first part has already been discussed in here a couple times, most recently here:

http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1698030/1

As for the second part: EDU-MA-CATION is the only way, but at the end of the day, you can't make other people do what you want and you can't teach an old dog new tricks. It may appear as a cultural thing, and it may be some extent, but there are plenty of good ol' minnesota borne and raised folks without a CPR attitude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my .02

The DNR is paid to manage the fisheries. They set limits etc...I impose my own limits such as releasing 20"+ walleyes (spawners) and eating only the 15-20" fish. That being said, I absolutely will keep my limit of 'eyes. If its gonna hurt the fishery, then the DNR isn't doing their job in setting the limits correctly.

The only other fish I eat are panfish and occasionally a few northerns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'd rather take what I need, which isn't much, rather than basing my limits on what the DNR says. I have a tough time, even with 3 or 4 people eating a limit of walleyes. I don't like to keep / freeze fish much either, good economy or not. If my money was so tight I had to keep all the fish I could, I'd be fooling myself. Every fish fillet I've put on the table myself has cost me way more than a store bought fillet or meal of anykind. Nothing wrong with keeping fish Selectively, to keep and eat, but to rely on the lake as a foodshelf, I'm not so sure I agree.

I was just thinking about apex predators such as big pike and muskies and their effects on lakes. They do a great job at balancing out of balancing (perch, sunfish, ect) out over-populated / stunted fish lower on the pyramid, per se. But I don't think they store them anywhere, like we do. Wolves don't kill and store for later either. It was just a thought. We are the ultimate apex predator, and wonder why we harvest and collect fish like we do??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
If its gonna hurt the fishery, then the DNR isn't doing their job in setting the limits correctly.

I don't buy this argument.

The only way the DNR can accurately set the correct limits for all types of fish is to have near perfect information on every lake & then tailor the limits to every individual lake based on populations, cycles, baitfish, recruitment, etc.

Can you imagine the outcry if each lake had its own limit? Yikers.

So saying "It's the limit" isn't really a valid argument. I could take my limit of pike out of Mille Lacs three times per week & probably never impact the fishery. If I did the same on small metro lakes they'd be hammered fast & take years to recover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to agree with Wade on this one Max. The DNR bases their rules on creel surveys, netting results, etc. and they do impose special regs. on certain waters as a result. You're right that no one rule can be applied to all situations but they do the best they can with what they have to work with all while trying to satisfy their clients...us.

How I choose to harvest when I go fishing impacts the DNR test results and so they make the rules accordingly. They don't make the rules by drawing from a hat. At least I hope not.

I don't feel I'm qualified to decide how many fish I can harvest and what size from a particular body of water. Therefore, I trust that the DNR is keeping tabs on the fishery and setting limits and other restrictions as needed.

Bob

Edit: I'm not strictly a C&R fisherman and so I will harvest fish when I want a meal and I may even take a few more than a meal for the freezer (within legal limits) if I happen to catch a good bite. If that means I am robbing the fishery then so be it. I enjoy eating fish and I won't apologize for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sour economy doesn't mean I go fishing more often, it means I keep more of what I catch when I DO get fishing. I'm out there to have a great time and don't generally get bothered when I come home and have a meal that doesn't have fish in it. But since I'm going fishing anyway, and am in money saving mode now, it's cheaper to keep more of those fish for meals than it is to spend more money on other things for lunch/supper at the grocery store.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone really think the DNR just pulls some numbers out of the air for what it taken from a lake? I am sure they don't know the exact numbers, but there is a system they use and it is probably pretty accurate as to how much is taken. If not we would have a pretty lousy fishery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to digress and change subjects, but this very conversation is where the 2 line bill has issues.

All of the data and harvest rates the DNR uses is mostly through creel survey data and the like. It is this reason why I am not 100% for 2 lines.

No, they do not pull numbers out of a hat to set limits.

Yes, in a perfect world each lake would be managed individually.

I love fish, therefore, I eat them! No one should feel guilty about what they harvest as long as it's w/in the limit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it affects each person differently. If I'm unemployed and hungry, you bet I will live on fish if I have to. I'd call it cashing in my rainy day fund, since I rarely keep anything now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it affects each person differently. If I'm unemployed and hungry, you bet I will live on fish if I have to. I'd call it cashing in my rainy day fund, since I rarely keep anything now.

Thats what I did at school. Now I dont keep a thing. I dont have any problem with keeping fish if you need to eat. It kept me going through some tough times and Im sure not going to feel bad about it. While I never broke a law, I did eat fish 3-4 times a week.

As long as its within the laws I have no problem. When people start stuffing the freezer and going over the limit, then its a problem.

Im sure there are a few more people out there keeping fish now, but I think most people still go fishing to have fun, not get food. There are lots of easier/more reliable ways to get some food other than fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am probably a 90% CPR type of person, the other 10% is usually because my kids want to keep their catch, we all like fish, but just not very often, or if the fish gets injured, then I will keep it, instead of sending it back to die. If I needed to live off of fishing, I think I would starve, I spend way more on fishing then I do food!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what can we do to change attitudes toward CPR, especially among different/prevalent south central mn cultures? or are we best served worrying about only ourselves?

Don't need to do much I don't think. Catch and release is huge everywhere you go, even southern MN. Most fisherman I know and that goes for almost everywhre in the state are more C&R,(actually I would call it selective harvest like In-fisherman does)than catch and keep everything.

Sometimes the C&R crowd gets a little overzealous IMO. As long as you eat what you keep and are not keeping a huge amount of fish, there is nothing wrong with keeping some for the table.

Oh and yes, I release the big ones back in the lake, and release the eaters into hot peanut oil, fish taste good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
How I choose to harvest when I go fishing impacts the DNR test results and so they make the rules accordingly. They don't make the rules by drawing from a hat. At least I hope not.

Oh yes, I wasn't saying that the DNR is pulling this stuff out of their arses. Just that I don't like hearing the argument "If the DNR says it's OK to take three pike a day & I can do that & it hurts the fishery, it's the DNR screwing up." I think folks have to use their heads based on the lake they're fishing (& I suspect folks here have better heads on their shoulders in this regard than the general population).

As for the original post, I've given it some thought. If I, personally, was laid off, I would eat more of the fish that I caught. I can't speak for others, but my 2-3 meals per year out of metro waters would definitely rise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Steve Foss,

Since you've been in this thread, I wanted to say that the pic in the Fall issue of the Boundary Waters Journal of the black wolf was fantastic. Stellar work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm up and down on CPR. I do it now more than I ever have. I have my own slot on the Croix. I keep between 16 and 20 inchers. Mainly try to stay with 18 inchers if I'm keeping any. Now, I don't need to keep a limit. A couple is fine. There are times i would keep a limit if I have had a hard time getting in my slot and get into a hot bite. I love to eat fish about once a week, sometimes a couple of times. I've kept a limit of 6, filleted 'em up and took 'em to work to have a small fish fry. They all enjoyed that. I do that at least once a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poeple do lie on creel surveys.

Soooo therefore the data collected is worthless and should be thrown away. People lie on this site about being C&R proponents too. I know plenty that would claim to support it without actually practicing.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't fish for food. that being said, nothing beats fried lake trout or a nice walleye dinner. if i get hungry enough i can always shoot a deer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Shame on you for questioning  these great and wonderful plans.  Have you no faith?  Besides it's pure nonsense.  She made a lot of claims that her plans would not add anything to the deficit or debt   But we have heard those same claims many times over.  It's a mystery why people still believe that everything is going to be funded through just simply raising taxes on people making over $250,000 a year just because "their " candidate said so When a candidate comes up with more spending ideas and tells you that the "rich" are going to be the ones that are going to fund them ,what they really mean is they're  going to fund them through printing and borrowing. They just use accounting tricks and schemes to hide the cost but I prefer math   Personally, I prefer any candidate I were to support tell us how they're going to get us out of this fiscal mess we're in    
    • I agree he should not have been playing in the world cup.
    • Im going to run my Elite 5 on the dash also, soley as my gps. So that will free up space on the Garmin for the side imaging...Now I cant wait for spring to try out all the new toys haha....I've always heard Garmin were really nice I just never saw any of their units that had the features I wanted and were in my $$ range.. I think I'll be really happy with it...Im curious how the preloaded maps are that come with it (lakevu??) I think its called. It would be sweet if it would take my Garmin upper midwest fishing guide chip, but I doubt it does.
    • I don't think it will adhere to the surface very well under 50 degrees.  Especially on the bottom, it could create some real problems if it doesn't stick very well!
    • Sure wakes ya up when nodding off and that reel goes ZINGGGG!!
    • lol sugar coat it all you want Nick the Gophers are a 7th best team in the Big 10 period. They don't have a meaningful win this entire season and they didn't beat any other team in the big 10 with a winning record except for Northwestern who are 5-4 in conference play but 6-6 overall. That isnt trolling at all, its facts.   I hope they can recruit by selling a trip to the Holiday Bowl this year. Big things happening for the Gophers!
    • that sounds great!!!  they were good pictures too!
    • I use the same set up and I think it's the only way to go.
  • Our Sponsors