Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jkjkoda

Hand held drill auger attchment

11 posts in this topic

Has any one used these? How well do they work? Hom many holes can you really drill? 10 inches of ice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Ice Master Ice Auger/Power Drill Conversion Kit. I use it on a Black and Decker 18 volt cordless drill. Have attached a 6" Mora and a 5" Lazer.

It will eventually get through the ice, but I can crank through the ice by hand much faster.

I'm sure the brand/type/power of drill has much to do with the results. I'm going to lug it out again for late ice and next season's early ice just to see if it works any better.

The ice I first tried it on was at least 8" and the most recent time I tried it about 2 feet. Again the results weren't really impressive and it seemed like it was somewhat hard on the drill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has any one used the nills hand auger to redrill holes in a fish house im thinking of getting one just for that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a buddy of mine uses one on his dewalt 18XRP he loves it. he says he get 4 holes with 16 inches of ice on 2 warm fully charged batteries. he said the hammer feature makes the battery go longer.

if it was me i would just use the handle on a 5-6 inch hand auger. especially if its only 10 inches of ice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, that sounds like more work than just hand drilling the holes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a guy with a plug in drill and a generator and he zipped through the ice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an 18volt DeWalt. With it I can get about 22 holes in 8" of ice PER battery. 2 fully charged batteries = about 40 holes.

Now that is with a 6" Mora bit and good blades. I think if you had a better drill like a 6" Lazer or (I hate to admit it) a nils, you will likely have better results.

I realy like mine. I think in early season when the ice is a bit thinner, and the fish are shallower and spookier, is when it realy shines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 19.2 Craftsman hammer drill on low with a 6" Nils auger. It has worked great! The most I have drilled this year is 20 hole in one day and still had battery left. This was in 16" of ice. I also have the Craftsman radio that works on the same battery so I just throw in 3 or 4 batterys for the day of fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5" Lazer.

It will eventually get through the ice, but I can crank through the ice by hand much faster.

I tried the same 5" lazer auger on my Black and Decker 18 volt. It will cut, but I'd have to agree it leaves a lot to be desired. Seems hard to get it started straight too, lots of wobble. I thought it might be convenient for new early season thin ice, but I can cut it faster by hand.

I also have two gas augers so I really didn't need it but thought the lightweight part would be nice if it worked good.

Just my two cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think drills are made to be augers and I think you will be buying a new drill much sooner than you would want to. Just my 2 cents worth. Smitty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Love the curvature of the antlers.   Beautiful mount!
    • Not a monster for sure but he makes the season a success. I wasnt going to be able to hunt tomorrow because of a first communion, not afternoon today because of my dads birthday, and only evenings Monday&Tuesday.  So time was limited and i am more than happy to eat jake. Here he is.
    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
  • Our Sponsors