Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
canman

Is 200khz single frequency good enough for fishfinder?

7 posts in this topic

Alright everyone. Is getting a single frequency (200khz) good enough for fishing walleyes? Up to 60 feet of water? What are your recommendations? I want to upgrade and would like some additional advice based upon your experience.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so. But if you're not sure the dual beam models are not that much more money, and then you have the narrower beam if you want / need it.

I used to have dual beam units but never used the narrower beam, my last several units have been 200 khz only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in the answer too, since I will be upgrading my transom graph in a year or so.

And it also brings up a question I've had in my mind. Right now I have a dual freq. And I fish primarily on a lake with irregular breaks that can change depths very quickly. Most of the fish are on outer weedline in 16-22 feet.

Last year I ran it at a wider cone angle so I would have a better chance of marking fish. But if I'm understanding how it works correctly, the narrower cone angle would be more accurate to the actual bottom depth directly below me. Disadvantage being I will mark less fish with smaller cone. Is this thinking correct? If so, I would could troll more accurately with the narrower beam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Solbes I’m thinking you are correct. The way I understand it is(someone please correct me if I am wrong) the higher frequency signal(i.e. 200kHz) gives a more narrow "cone angle" and a lower freq (i.e. 50kHz) gives a wider cone angle.

The 200 then gives more detail over less area where the 50 would give less detail over more area. The lower freq also does better at penetrating deeper water. I was told, when using a 200kHz you will see an area about 1/3 of your depth. So, for all you math whiz's, in 30ft you will see about 10ft circle. (and in 12ft only a 4ft..not very much)

For fishing walleyes in 60 ft or less, I would think a 200kHz would be everything you need and then some. However, I do think running a split freq screen would give you a better idea of what’s happening down there. I am looking to upgrading to a dual freq 200/50 ducer for that purpose and for better tracking of rigger balls at depths of 100ft+ (more for salmon, not walleye). My main unit is a LCX27, which has dual freq capabilities but only came with a 200kHz skimmer transducer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not 100% positive, but I think kHz measures power put out by the unit and the cone angle is measured in degrees. Dual frequency may have more to do with rejecting interference.

When you are reading your depth finder, the number of feet it tells you you are at is the shallowest reading it decifers. For instance, if you are on a flat and it reads 30 feet of water, it is pretty close. If you are along a steep break where the bottom falls from 30 feet to 40 feet within the cone angle, you might be in 35 feet. This would have to be a very steep drop since you are reading about a ten foot difference within a ten foot circle.

I thought about this a minute and "googled" how a fish finder works. The top result of that search gives a pretty good tutoral about how these things work. I think I'm partially correct, but check it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help. The 200khz will be all I need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lower khz (ie. 50) will have a narrower beam, so if you're on a steep break you will have less of "dead zone" with the 50 than the 200. But in 16-22 feet you're not talking about a very big difference in the cone size. I still prefer the overall performance better with the wider beam 200 khz ..... but like I said earlier, the dual beam models are not much more money so if you think you might want to use the dual beam it's not a big deal to get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I was out last night on a local lake and was surprised to see the water temp down to 57.  Caught a couple cookie cutter fish, but not the big ones I was looking for. Fished a lot of weeds in the 6-9ft range, but not a lot going on there. The biggest one was still shallow in some reeds, so not sure if we are still in the spawn/post spawn stage.     Whats everyone else seeing out there for a bite and fishing conditions. Big weekend coming up, Good luck!! 
    • Maxine_Partain, Welcome to the forum.  There seem to be a lot of folks from Canada joining up in the last half a year which is nice. The sad thing is they all seem to make about 3 posts on the same day they joined and then they never come back which is sad. Hopefully you will keep posting.
    •   Hazel Hain, Welcome to the forum.  There seem to be a lot of folks from Canada joining up in the last half a year which is nice. The sad thing is they all seem to make about 3 posts on the same day they joined and then they never come back which is sad. Hopefully you will keep posting.
    • hi and welcome to HSO. I think you mean double hung not double pane. if you have moisture between the panes you have a seal failure. depending on the brand you might be able to just replace the glass. If you have lots of rot you may need to do a complete replacement. Best to have a window person pop by and check out the situation. 
    • Some times it's just nice getting out of town and when your with the right people a wet weekend can still be fun. This weekend should be better!
    • Cool story! 
    • Reb's old girlfriend might have had a diaphragm, but you would find that one in the lower unit - not in the carburetor...
    • Most of the homeowner's expense comes from heating and cooling inside a home. Double pane windows have gasses like argon or krypton filled to displace the air between the panels. But the problem is when this leaks from the window panes and settles down at the bottom. 1) The main problem that would arise is condensation. The moisture level goes high thus causing mold, mildew and rotting wood sills. 2) If the gas leaks, the window will not provide better insulation. 3) The windows start to make squeaky sounds thus it is hard to close and open. 4) It also affects the stripping to loose. I live here in Canada. In our house, we have double pane windows in almost all the rooms. Now I could see that some of the windows to be in a foggy condition. Will it be due to the gas in the window panes? Should I need to replace the windows? I have heard that casement windows.are good compared to double pane windows. I would like to know the benefits of casement windows. Will it cut down my utility bills? Please do share your thoughts and valuable suggestions. Thanks for the time.
    • We spent last weekend in the camper, holed up hiding from the rain. Not the worst thing ever, but a hike would've been nice. Hopefully we'll have better weather over Memorial Day. It looks good now so I'm excited. 
    • I am in a confusion on which one to choose. I have anyways decided to separate the bath area from the toilet. Which one would be better? I don't have enough area in the bathroom. One of my friends said that when it comes to energy efficiency and water conservation, a quick shower virtually always beats a bath. Is it true??   Although it is good for relaxing and ideal for bathing small children, I think it will be difficult for older people and people with injuries to get in and out. When it comes to the case of water heaters also I think it will be difficult to fill the tub. I think all these issues can be sorted out using a shower. Showers always need only less water. But if there is any leak, it will be difficult to fix.   I personally prefer bathtubs. Although it has many disadvantages compared to showers, the relaxation and freshness we get after bathing in a tube are very different. What is your opinion? Based on your opinion, I want to fix my decision and approach a plumbing company for installing it. Feel free to share your thoughts.
  • Our Sponsors