Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gator Slayer

A DOG PARK!!!!!!!!!

75 posts in this topic

That's the first great expenditure from the Dedicated Funding Amendment. Oh don't forget there will be 11 people hired to manage those 7 "metro area" parks. All you who voted for this must be extremely proud. WOW will this improve our "quality environment." I can't wait to see what they suggest once they decide to get creative withthe spending.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused, are they building more parks? I know they already have a few around the cities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was one small part of the bill, yes. People in the city voted too and now have another green place to take their dog and let them run. I see no problem with that. Its better than building condos on that land right? It also dedicated funding for the arts as well...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I hope to He%% that money (it's only a MILLION DOLLARS) comes from the Artsie Fartsie Fund.. No it's not better than building condos.. Condos are space efficient the tighter we can pack the citiots the less impact on wildlife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to disagree when you say "a small part of the bill.MN house file 297 is 1 million dollars to start.Then additionally the county/state has to match that amount two to one.That comes out to 3 million dollars to establish said doggie park.NOT SMALL AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!c63I wonder if we (tax payers)will have to pay out any law suits if a couple of these dogs get into a scuffle and someone gets bitten???c63

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess nobody in the city has a voice on the issue? I guess being a "citiot" I look at it in a different light. Im not saying that i would even go there, but its going to be used for lots of other stuff too. Environment is more than just parks in rural areas. The way I looked at it was that the more funding that could be sent to the environment the better. There will still be more funding for the environment than there was before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have as much of a problem with dog parks as I do with the arts part of it. Dog parks aren't new. I've taken my dogs there from time to time, but haven't been there in a while. It's cool to let them run their tails off. I don't know that it's worth millions, but I'd rather have that than another worthless sculpture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

II'd rather have that than another worthless sculpture.

OOOOhhhhhhh but you're going to get both..... Let's not lose sight of the fact that they just added 11 more people to the government teet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont get me wrong, I would have rather seen it go to stocking programs or wma's or something like that. I really do hope thats where the majority of the funds will go. But, they have the pleasure of trying to please everyone, which obviously will never happen. There will be things that some people think are riduculous but to others are important. Thats where the issue is. They really went accross a broad spectrum of people with this one and are trying to make everyone count. (they probably should have narrowed the reach or the bill down a little but it would have never passed like that)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a lot of "important" people who sold this pig-in-a-poke to us saying that it would benefit the environment. Just like the lottery was supposed to. I would like to hear from them that this is the "greatest thing since sliced bread" for the outdoors person. CUZ THAT"S HOW THEY SOLD IT TO YOU!!!!!!!!! I obviously voted no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of you drive up 169? You know the dog training/running/trial WMA on west side up by Milaca area? Is that worthless too? Just wondering...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of you drive up 169? You know the dog training/running/trial WMA on west side up by Milaca area? Is that worthless too? Just wondering...

sounds like another great well kept secret---governementally funded

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at hf297 about the dog park and nowhere on there does it say anything about the funding from the amendment dollars.

The funding is from the parks and trails fund.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

e) No later than January 15, 2011, the chair of the Metropolitan Council must provide a program report along with any program recommendations to the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over environmental finance and, if such committees exist, the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over the allocation of constitutionally dedicated parks and trails funding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good news for us Citiots with Dogs!

Nothing but concrete around here for the most part ya know!.... smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: BoxMN
Do any of you drive up 169? You know the dog training/running/trial WMA on west side up by Milaca area? Is that worthless too? Just wondering...

sounds like another great well kept secret---governementally funded

Let's see... its a WMA, that comes from stamp money, doesn't it?

BTW - I don't use this or the dog parks. But it is greenspace. Have you ever been to a "dog park"? I have, and there is wetlands and buffer strips in the one I am aware of. Hmmm, just wondering, but maybe that is better than asphalt and concrete or more urban or suburban sprawl. It depends upon how it is designed, but it just might be in an area(s) where it will help filter runoff.

I don't know there proposed areas, so can't say for sure. But since you guys don't either (or do you?) can you with 100% say it won't help with water quality? BTW, WMA's and parks and yes even dog parks harbor wildlife more than just the birds and deer we shoot in the fall. I guess maybe some of you don't think that parks of any sort are good for us cidiots...

...btw, I am not saying this would be my choice for spending the money, but can't say it is worthless venture and poor use of this $$ either.

Keep the flames coming at all who supported the amendment. I am sure you will regardless, and usually before the details are given, as usual. smile

edit - BTW, parks are specifically mentioned as one of the areas $$ will go to. So how is this in not keeping with the goal/task of the amendment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a lot of "important" people who sold this pig-in-a-poke to us saying that it would benefit the environment. Just like the lottery was supposed to. I would like to hear from them that this is the "greatest thing since sliced bread" for the outdoors person. CUZ THAT"S HOW THEY SOLD IT TO YOU!!!!!!!!! I obviously voted no.

Voted no as well. Learned lessons with the lottery. I didn't trust them before the vote and they are living up to my expectations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Gator Slayer
There were a lot of "important" people who sold this pig-in-a-poke to us saying that it would benefit the environment. Just like the lottery was supposed to. I would like to hear from them that this is the "greatest thing since sliced bread" for the outdoors person. CUZ THAT"S HOW THEY SOLD IT TO YOU!!!!!!!!! I obviously voted no.

Voted no as well. Learned lessons with the lottery. I didn't trust them before the vote and they are living up to my expectations.

I kinda feel sorry for those that really believed this money was going to go where they were told it was going to go. A person has high ideals and believes that the govt wants to follow the same ideals and then finds later that they were literally scammed, bummer.

I used to have those high ideals and believed in politicians, but looking back and comparing words to actions, they just don't match up. Tend to take most of what they say with grain or 20 of salt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess maybe some of you don't think that parks of any sort are good for us cidiots...

...btw, I am not saying this would be my choice for spending the money, but can't say it is worthless venture and poor use of this $$ either.

Keep the flames coming at all who supported the amendment. I am sure you will regardless, and usually before the details are given, as usual. smile

edit - BTW, parks are specifically mentioned as one of the areas $$ will go to. So how is this in not keeping with the goal/task of the amendment?

What details do you need BOX, it's all right there in the house bill. Any of my facts wrong?

I see no one mentions the 11 additional Governement employees who will oversee the parks.

No one mentions the 2 million additional dollars out of our pockets (County and State comitment)

If you want parks, take back the ones you have from the gangbangers. I can't wait for the first report of someone's pocket dog getting eaten by a gangbanger's rottie or Am Staff. "and the gov did nothing to protect my dog." $$$$$ I've been to a couple dog parks, weren't much more than fenced in football fields (easier upkeep).

50% of our waters are polluted (Or so we were constantly told before the scam, err I mean election) and we're spending the first 3 million on a dog park.

I don't see how taking land within the city and making it off limits helps slow sprawl... seems to me it would make it worse by taking it out of development.

Like I've said the supporters MUST be proud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is everyone who is against the Dog Park monies coming from the new clean water amendment not see how the a Dog Park could help keep waters cleaner?

The Off Leash Dog Area (OLDA) that was recently built in Minnewashta Regional park should help keep the waters of Lake Minnewashta cleaner. How? Folks used to walk their dogs on a walking trail that ropes along the shoreline of the lake. In theory, making it very easy for the dog's waste to wash into the lake. Sure, dog owners are supposed to clean up the doo doo from their dogs, but it's hard to contain the pee. Now most folks bring their dogs to the OLDA instead of walking the trails. The OLDA is not near the shoreline. Also the people visiting the OLDA police each other, so much more of the doo doo gets picked up, too.

This ONE Dog Park is helping us keep the areas water cleaner. I would like to know how the new proposed dog park doesn't help keep our waters clean. Does the new Dog Park include paving the ground and draining all the run-off into our lakes and streams?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • any ideas on where or what to fish around there between oct 10 15?  
    • Gotta love rural America!
    • I don't think you need to do much scouting lol, that one in the picture is all you need to know however many people are getting giants on trailcam NOW, that they won't get come November. Are you bowhunting ? I'd assume maybe posting this in the archery forum and I'd assume my stand would be in appleville for now, one stand on each end, I'd try to figure the bedding area he or other nice bucks tend to use and then play the wind 100% of the time. Hunt weather changes types of days and if you have the chance I'd hunt as much as possible the 7 days before rifle opens, by then you should see ground scrapes in that area, I wouldn't hesitate to hunt 25 yards from the biggest freshest scrape you find come later October/first 4 days of November you could see him or another at high noon etc. 2 o'clock etc. they cruise daylight hours heavy then because they've already smelled or bred their first doe of the year and the woods are usually left quiet for rifle season so they travel like crazy.
    • I settled on the Muzzy 3 blade after going back and forth on all of the options.  I've been out tearing up my target with them the last several days and they've been shooting well for me.  I was a bit nervous the first day out with them as they were terrible groups and about 4-5 inches high and left.  I took a day of off shooting and came back and started shooting again and all of a sudden the groups where down to 3" and right on target.  Been shooting fine ever since.  I guess we all have our bad days. One of the big reasons I went with Muzzy is because I'm shooting a lighter draw weight so everything I've seen said to stick with fixed blades when shooting lower weights.  They've also been around forever and have stood the test of time.  Plus you can get a 6 pack + practice head for $37 at fleet farm so they are about $6/head versus $10-15 for alot of other brands.
    • Selfish lives matter, he's has the right to leave this country also, do it and see how things are in other countries. He needs a haircut really bad. Big tough guy Colon Kaepernick speaks we should all listen, I'd like to see how far a military man's boot could fit into that colon.
    • I've done some practice in a seated position as well and was shooting just fine so that is also an option.  I think i've got my bases covered to adapt to whatever the deer may throw at me.
    • Don't get it either fishuhalik, he's gonna burn quite a few dollars making that hiatus to go shoot up the local mallards, some honkers and maybe some shovelers,gadwalls, idk lol. Tomorrow morning I'm going to do in some honkers first, then hit the river woodies (solid bank type river easy walking) then put binocs on those mallards and if any appear green headed they're going to get it to and I'm riding a bicycle to my hunting spot(s). A mini ND run in a way lol. This is not the year in this area where you should feel the need to hunt outstate, but most still are going. Like last weekend, I guess I'll battle these swarms of ducks and geese, alone. Roosters in this east central mn area also it showed ->49 per square mile on the charts yet everyone bails for Morris, Marshall, or the Dakota's or Iowa. Must have money to burn but oh well thank you, I'll be on my bike for those soon enough also lol. Good luck everyone, heard if true the morning should be fairly cloudy burning off around noon kinda hope they're right, that sun can be nasty some mornings, next need a wasp/skeeter killing freeze ! 
    • I shot a lot of deer with the good old Bear Super Razorhead.  In 2008 when I finally bought a new bow, I bought carbon arrows for the first time and used Rocket Steelheads.  I've shot 12 to 15 deer since then with the Steelheads, both 100s and 125s.  All but one has been a pass through.  I think they are an amazing head.  The 125s are my favorite, but they quit making them.  I bought a bunch on hsolist so have probably a 10 year supply.  Not sure if I should buy more or finally move on to a new head when I run out.
    • Maybe, but the total kill and the kill of big bucks had been declining significantly before the tough winters hit.  Look at the kill stats from the early 2000s on.  Massive increase in doe harvest when bonus tags were allowed.  That, combined with wolf predation and winter drove the herd down extremely low.  IMVHO, you can't keep whacking the heck out of does when you have other very significant mortality factors at play. On a positive note, talking to one of the environmental staff this past June, he said they had been seeing more big bucks this year.  Hopefully one walks past me.   Good luck everyone!
    • Anyfish2 has good advice!
  • Our Sponsors