Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott Stein

New Law

25 posts in this topic

has anybody heard anything about this new law that will require anyone who has not boughten a bow license before this coming year,to have to take a Bowhunter Ed Class in order to get a license? its kind of like the trapping license ordeal,take a whole day class,then a whole field day just in order to buy a license! imo its a pain in the rear,just thankful ive had a license b4 so if it becomes a law i will be exempt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see that law passed. Most new archers are ready to hunt but could use some help and direction in archery hunting.

The Archery hunters do not need any more bad wraps about poor archery hunters with bad ethics and wounded deer that with a little education could be better afield.

I believe we do owe it to the wildlife to be prepared as possible before we go hunting with a bow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im mixed, im lucky im going into my 9th year by my gf is thinking about starting and i know if i tell her she has to go to a class she will get mad, or she will make me go with her

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my gf is thinking about starting and i know if i tell her she has to go to a class she will get mad, or she will make me go with her

So go with her! I'm sure you could benefit from it- I'm sure we all could benefit from it.

I'm with harvey on this one. I'm generally against more regulation and greater governmental control/involvement, but I have to agree with harvey for the reasons he stated. If they required this for new archers, I'd take it even if it wasn't required for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be a good law. I have bow hunted for years, and see to many people who do not spend the time shooting there bow before going hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree to this law also for the above mentioned reasons.

I have and still bow hunt, I am still willing to take a class if there would be one closer to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad its a rumer! Most everything in this state is TOO controled and it all has a fee payible to the state!To participate.

Whatever I've done in Mn required some kind of a license/permit then follow up classes to keep it and everything has a charge.

No taxes but a fee for everything!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hunted for the first time last year with a bow and to be honest I think it's not that bad of an idea. I actually would have sat in on one if I had to. Maybe would have learned something. I know when I did hunter safety the instructor gave us soo many tips it was well worth it to do it in person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a Bowhunter Ed Instructor and I have not heard of this. I think it should be mandatory, it already is in several states. I agree with Harvey and Scoot and...all the rest.

Archery hunting is different enough from other forms of hunting that there should be some form of specific education geared towards the sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All kinds of bowhunter related stuff. From scents to scouting to stand placement, yardage estimation, equipment, treestand safety, blood trailing, shot placement, ethics, tresspass laws, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that there are too many laws already and we as hunter's are responsible for teaching new comers to hunt and fish. Part of the experience for the sportsman is to show others what we all enjoy about the outdoors. Please, we all have a duty to teach others how to shoot,fish, and be safe in whatever we do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Black Bay, that is the Hunter Ed class offered by the DNR. It only pays the instructor for the time he spends offering his time for this class. No profit here at all for the state.

I don't believe its my job to make sure all hunters have ethics and are ready to archery hunt but I will help out any newcomer to the sport if they are interested in learning. It really is the duty of the new archer to make sure they are in tune with the sport they are interested in.

Archery hunting for deer is growing and we need to make sure that the new archers have done what is needed to be a safe and qualified archers. Way to many poor archers with either no ethics or poor knowledge are giving the sport of archery hunting a bad wrap.

Yes, there will always be a bad hit and a lost deer even with expierenced archers but I would hope that all would take the time

needed to make sure they are as knowledgable as they can be before they hit the field to go hunting.

The Hunter Ed classes offer so much in regards to any sport. As mentioned above, one can learn every aspect of archery hunting and for sure make them a better archers.

It all comes down to one very important factor and that is we all as archers owe it to the animal to be well prepared to have a safe and successful hunt.

I surely don't mean to upset anyone but we really do need to help promote the sport of archery hunting and as I stated we owe it to the animal and all the other archers that go afield.

I'm by no means a supporter of more taxes or fees but the Hunter Ed classes are not that expensive and one will learn so much from it.

I have seen over the years so many that can shoot pretty good at 20 yards but they have no idea what they are trying to do when they take that questionable shot or shot at to long of a distance.

I realize that within time from expierence and hunting afield we will be a better archer but we should at a minimum start out with at least the best skills we can acquire.

I myself took this Hunter Ed class a few years back and was also asked if I would help teach one of these classes. If I had more time I would have also done that. After archery hunting for more than 20 years, I still learned things that others do to make my expierence outdoors better.

In regards to the cost of the class, with all the money we spend as archers, whats another $10 bucks to learn a few things or better yet, maybe help out a new comers to the sport?

What great about the Archery forum here on Fishing Minnesota is a newcomer can learn many things about the sport by asking questions and learning from the other archers here on Fishing Minnesota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings on this. Yes its good to teach hunter ethics, proper shot placement, range estimation, etc. but we don't want to make it too difficult to recruit future bow hunters. If a kid or anybody for that matter decides in June that hes wants to buy a bow and hunt that fall but then finds out he needs to take a class before he can buy an license, and most classes are held in the winter, you're making it into an 18 month ordeal just for them to archery hunt. That will discourage new hunters.

Plus I wasn't that impressed with the class I went to (in order to be able to hunt out of state). It lasted from 8 AM to 6:30 PM on a Sat, it got to be an ordeal. Do they really need to go over the history of archery and big game identification?? I think most people can identify an elk from a moose, especially at archery distances. Shorten up the class, cover the main points, and call it a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be opposed to the course being mandatory. I took it 7-8 years ago and it was pretty painless. I'm signing my fiance up for it this spring, not because she needs it to hunt here in MN, but because it's a great class for all experience levels, especially newcomers. Besides, it'll give the flexibility to participate in metro and out-of-state hunts. Not a bad deal for devoting one day to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why pick on bow hunters -

How about a mandatory class for fisherman on the proper way to release a fish?

How about a refresher course ever 5 years for firearms?

If you own a boat you must take a class on how to identify and remove invasive species.

Next thing I will have to take a class on how to pick up [PoorWordUsage] from my dog.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things. First, Harvey, the instructors DO NOT get any of the money. It is all volunteer. Some of it may go to the venue hosting the class.

Next, Blackjack. Every instructor will cover different material. I'm sorry your class was not everything you were hoping for but these classes are geared towards newer hunters. The thing that really makes the classes loose some of the fun is experienced archers who think they know it all (I'm not saying this is you) and are not happy about "having" to take the class in order to do their special hunt.

Still, like Harvey said most everyone who takes a class should walk out at the end of the day having learned something new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to take the bowhunter ed coarse to go hunting out west. I personaly feel everyone who bowhunts should take it. Everyone who buys a rifle tag born after 12/31/79 has to have firearms safty to get a tag, why not the same for bohunter ed.

I think the way it is now is pathetic. If you are born after the above date, you can still buy a archery tag and hunt, but you missed out on many of the other things, saftey wise, learned in the firearms coarse.

I would like to see it passed. If you have not taken it, you should. You never know when you will get a chance to go to a mountain state and hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never taken the class, but I dont think it is a bad idea. I personally think the best teacher when it comes to the outdoors is going to be your dad or a father-like figure that takes the time to take you afield and really show you what its like. But for those who cant experience that taking classes from experienced people would be a good option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm kind of torn on the issue. On one hand the idea of more education is a good thing, but the mandatory nature and the imposing of ANOTHER regulation is hard to swallow.

Also, just because people have to take the class, doesn't mean they are dialed in and get a lot out of it. It is better than nothing, but just because they take the class doesn't mean they won't make a bad shot or show some poor hunting ethics.

Just like anything else it is going to be what you make of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great post. It opened up my mind to the fact we could all use some new knowledge regarding a sport we enjoy. Plus I think I might take the class if its available near me. This way i can use the criculum(sp) to teach my two younger bow hunters coming up in the ranks. We can all use a little extra education and take in anothers perspective.

On this note I think there should be a manditor class and testing for boat drivers and even licenses just like driving a car. A boat is just as dangeours as a car but thats another subject and posting.

mr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am going to have to disagree with this law. I belive that the best way to become a great bowhunter is by learning everything out in the field on your own. This was only my second year bowhunting and I have learned so much about deer and there habbitat, the importance of scouting, and being scent free. the first year hunting i spent about 60 hours in the stand and didn't even see a deer. Last season I took time before the season to scout my surrounding area and foung a good spot to hunt. The first time hunting it I saw my first deer. But it also saw me and I got busted. Later that night I shot my first deer. Threwout the season I picked up a few tricks of the trade by spending time in the stand, watching deer bust me, and learning from these mistakes that I have made. This to me is a much better learning experence than any class could give me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you pass on your once in a lifetime moose tag just because their is a manditory class involved if you dont go your tag is no good and there goes your lifetime hunt. My dad had surgery for prostate cancer 3 days before our class if he didnt go he could not hunt with me he sat in pain through the class so he could hunt. Guess what the old guy also shot our moose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • wear a good balaclava and get a open face with a cold weather breath box never had a problem
    • In my opinion I would look for a nice used wingmaster 2 of my friends have bought a new 870 express about a year apart and they both had the same shell extraction problems. Maybe just a fluke but when I see two different people have the same problem with a Gun makes me think to find a different choice. Heck I have a Mossberg 500 that I treat like poop and I have never had one single malfunction.   I have shot my friends newer express and I can really tell the difference in quality beside my wingmaster  
    • I have Ice Kings.  They are in a word, awesome.  They are about 20-25 years old. Dang I hate dating myself but I have never even bought new liners for these boots.  They are probably one of the finest products I won.  I have never had so much as a chill i my feet.  I usually fish outside but if I am in a flip over, my feet are usually on the ice.  Again, never a chill.  I typically wear a midnight smart wool sock.   For some reason I have been considering new boots.  I guess it is the weight, I would love to have something that is not s heavy and also has better traction.   Today I visited Joe's Sporting Goods and saw some really nice boots (they have a great selection) by Muck, Lacrosse, Sorel, Baffin and some other Canadian made boot that looked very nice. I checked out the ice Kings........they are not the same boot as I have, they don't seem to have the quality to me.  They might be as warm but the rubber feels more stiff almost like it would crack, the uppers are solid leather, mine are leather and corder combo.  The liner also seemed thinner.   After looking at all the boots, I am surprised none offer water proof uppers. Also I am not entirely certain why some seem extend up to your knee with insulation.  Just seems like Over kill because most who would where these boots owed also have some sort of insulated pant on.  Overall I found the boots to be pretty heavy, I was surprised with 20 years past boots have not advanced more.
    • But will be missed but most.............you mad bro?    
    • You boxed yourself.   He was not supporting the Vikings stadium, he was saying that Republicans supported it and now are feigning outrage over the cook subsidy. And then not to be outdone the Republicans are now celebrating the Carrier subsidy.   Pretty much just reinforced his point.      
    • Think we should change the topic to "Trump for Trees."........and all will be well.
    • Had to go all the way back to Missouri to hunt in the snow this year! Beautiful morning but not much movement. Did see some late rut activity Friday.
    • Dotch, you guys over there are almost famous....   Almost because it is Waseca, but whatever.    Mark Seeley's weather blog... http://blog-weathertalk.extension.umn.edu/   .... Waseca now reports 54.13 inches of precipitation for 2016 and this is a new statewide annual precipitation record, surpassing the old one of 53.52" at St Francis (Anoka County) in 1991.
      ....   And an interesting thought...(from Mark, not me) Commentary on Winter TIME: No question will be answered this week, but I want to take TIME to make a comment about Winter TIME. Managing the TIME in the Winter Season in Minnesota is a different ball game than other seasons of the year, because everything takes longer. No question winter will be felt more frequently soon in the daily weather, and snowfalls will become more frequent this month. The rash of bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicular accidents reported during the snow storms towards the end of November reminded me about adjusting for Winter TIME. Our concept of time needs to be adjusted. Lengthen the time intervals that you have intuitively built-into your everyday habits and tasks. It takes longer to walk places, longer to drive places, longer to dress and undress, longer to warm up the car, longer to degomble (shed snow) when you come into the house. You need to make time to shovel snow, scrape the windshield, clean the furnace filters, When you walk take shorter steps and not too fast...put the boots, gloves and hat on when you go outside....check on the neighbor if their place hasn't been shoveled...everything should slow down..except for the long Minnesota goodbye..that is better shortened...just say goodbye, open the door, leave and close the door behind you....no need to stand in an open doorway for minutes conversing about last minute stuff. Winter TIME is an adjustment that may save you anxiety, regret, or even injury.
    • Would you use a bobber on your rattle reel with these? I would think a lively minnow would pull the line out of the contacts.
    • My my, how the mighty have fallen...  I went back to the thread on the cook subsidy, and what did I find in the second post from you, on the second page....     Gee, you were ok with the 66 million because it wasn't a stadium or something, but now all butt hurt over 7 million of Indiana money?    Now that there is a funny joke.  
  • Our Sponsors