Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Nick Kuhn

First in the nation:

Recommended Posts

Anyone else read this?

Nation's First 'Underwater Wind Turbine' Installed in Old Man River

By Alexis Madrigal EmailDecember 22, 2008 | 8:08:03 PMCategories: Energy, Environment

Hydrokinetic

The nation's first commercial hydrokinetic turbine, which harnesses the power from moving water without the construction of a dam, has splashed into the waters of the Mississippi River near Hastings, Minnesota.

The 35-kilowatt turbine is positioned downstream from an existing hydroelectric-plant dam and — together with another turbine to be installed soon — will increase the capacity of the plant by more than 5 percent. The numbers aren't big, but the rig's installation could be the start of an important trend in green energy.

And that could mean more of these "wind turbines for the water" will be generating clean energy soon.

"We don't require that massive dam construction, we're just using the natural flow of the stream," said Mark Stover, a vice president at Hydro Green Energy, the Houston-based company leading the project. "It's underwater windpower if you will, but we have 840 or 850 times the energy density of wind."

Hydrokinetic turbines like those produced by Hydro Green and Verdant capture the mechanical energy of the water's flow and turn it into energy, without need for a dam. The problem for companies like Hydro Green is that their relatively low-impact turbines are forced into the same regulatory bucket as huge hydroelectric dams. The regulatory hurdles have made it difficult to actually get water flowing through projects.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has oversight of all projects that involve making power from water, and the agency has recently shown signs of easing up on this new industry. In the meantime, the first places where hydrokinetic power makes in impact could be at existing dam sites where the regulatory red tape has already been cut.

“I am thrilled to support today's historic order that allows for harnessing more power from the Mississippi River,” FERC Commissioner Philip Moeller said in a release. “I hope this is the first of thousands of similar projects that produce clean and renewable power from in-stream flows at existing dams.”

Moeller's enthusiasm could encourage other companies that are trying similar strategies to tap tidal or current power.

Verdant has been testing its own turbine design to capture tidal flow in New York's East River, but it hasn't been easy.

"Verdant has spent more money on permitting their East River project that than they did on hardware," said Roger Bedard, a researcher at the Electric Power Research Institute, who has studied water-current–based energy generation.

Hydro Green's Stover hopes that his company's new unit will help shorten that regulatory process by generating environmental impact data that could ease concerns the turbines will disrupt river ecosystems and habitats.

And in the meantime, investors will continue to scour the planet for companies and technologies that could benefit from Barack Obama's plans to create green jobs. Congress already passed a bill this year to extend tax incentives for hydrokinetic projects through 2016.

"After the wind and solar craze, people said, 'What else is out there?'" Stover said. "The investment community is quite interested."

Image: Mark Stover/Hydro Green Energy, LLC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would almost guess that they have a RPM controller on them like the wind turbines do. If they turn at the same speed , i don't think there would be much problem for the fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would almost guess that they have a RPM controller on them like the wind turbines do. If they turn at the same speed , i don't think there would be much problem for the fish.

Water is much more dense and they'd operate at a much lower speed. I would imagine fish could pass through it unharmed, though they probably would avoid it altogether. Windmills do kill birds though, they aren't 100% eco-friendly. The braking is just to keep the windmill from spinning out of control and destroying itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dam-based and dam-free hydro are essentially the same — water turns a turbine to generate electricity. The differences are noteworthy: Dams create “head” — a drop through which water falls to generate more power. During high or low water, however, dam-based hydro may operate less efficiently or shut down. Dam-free’s advantage is, well, it doesn’t require a dam. Hydro Green’s enclosed, horizontal-axis barge-mounted units with rotors 12 feet in diameter needs 22 feet of stream depth. Another plus: If it doesn’t work, yank it out. Hydro Green plans barge-mounted units with collapsible gantries that can lift turbines out of the river for routine maintenance or outright removal. In theory, dam-free turbines work wherever current flows — and work best in deep and fast water.

One of the issues is whether turbines harm migrating salmon and other fish. Dam-free hydro developers say the turbines turn slowly enough to allow fish to escape.

LeClaire, Iowa, gave up on hydro after trying since 1979. A federal Fish and Wildlife Service requirement for a 1,400 foot “fish rack” barrier killed the project. The rack bumped costs 57 percent to $110 million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont fall out of the boat. wink

Its nice to see that they are doing something like that. I have always wondered if that would work well or not. Dams kind of multiply the energy of the water with gravity makeing the turbines spin faster so im curious if it will really put out enough to be worthwhile. It sounds like they have done some serious research, so we will find out I guess.

No kind of power we have today is casualty free. Its just a matter of what kind, and how much of a casualty we are willing to accept. With the minimal impact of something like this, it should be a good thing. Like LIMITOUT said it can be removed if its a no go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

who cares about the fish making it through what if I fall out of my boat??again

lol that's what I was thinking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

who cares about the fish making it through what if I fall out of my boat??again

That might not be as big a problem for areas like Minnesota but if memory serves me correctly, it has been determined that building dams on rivers frequented by certain species can have a dramatic impact on their ability to survive.

I'm thinking of salmon for one where they spend much of their life in the ocean but rely on getting back to certain inland locations to spawn. We cut that path off to build our power plants without providing some means for the fish to pass by and we can dramatically impact their life cycle.

I don't know this for fact but am relying on my memory so take it with a grain of salt.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont take it the wrong way Bobt I am glad that this will allow us to use the water to provide clean energy without the use of dams. another big plus is no permanent structure. Just makes me wonder what will happen one some dummy gets drunk and decides to swim somewere they are not suppose to be.. (chum)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope there are safeguards to protect us from our own stupidity or lack of foresight.

I agree that the idea of the underwater turbine is better than building dams.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very slow rpm, might harm a couple fish but very rarily. something like 20 or 30 rpm. it is fixed under a "barge" of sorts and will be close to the dam were no boats are allowed. I think more use of these should be looked into.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: bottom-bouncer
who cares about the fish making it through what if I fall out of my boat??again

lol that's what I was thinking

If you fall out of the boat all I can say is thanks for the chum. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It slices, it dices, it makes gallons of Boater Puree in minutes. It's Boater Blender, yes Boater Blender.

Boater Blender...Coming soon to a crowded (but not for long if it's working right) waterway near you.

Boater Blender is endorsed by some of the finest cannibal tribes in the Amazon and South Pacific regions, where they have been using them for years to help their young'uns and elders who cannot thoroughly chew the fat of/with their "friends". They love it and they'd love you too.

Boater Blender....Take one for a spin today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very slow rpm, might harm a couple fish but very rarily. something like 20 or 30 rpm. it is fixed under a "barge" of sorts and will be close to the dam were no boats are allowed. I think more use of these should be looked into.

Yep these are put just below dams. The only 2 ways you're going to get chopped up by these is falling out of your boat upstream from the dam and go over it them through the turbine, or by getting your boat right up to the tailrace and then falling out. In either case you're dead with or without the turbine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not to blow original subject but a privete party offered to run a electic generating turbine or two of much smmaer size in the DNRs Mill Pond rebuild up here in New London mn and was actually shut down

With the first rbuild in 100 years you would think it would have generated some interest but no support from what i have heard.

You would think Excell or someone would like this

oh well back to your original post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • I tried a few new ones the last couple weeks. The first was Evan Williams 1783. Very good over ice or mixed with a splash of water. Plenty smooth and good enough that I got a second bottle to replace the one that somehow became empty. Price was about $16.    12 foot beard. This was ok and smooth enough to drink over ice. The best part about this one was that someone else bought it. Price was about $30 a bottle. It was good enough to drink on someone else's dime but I don't think I'd buy it myself.    I also tried a bottle of Redemption. This was very good over ice and about the closest thing I've found to the Trader Joe's bourbon that I like. Price was about $18 a bottle. Definitely one that I would buy again.    I dont know why but I like the bottle with a cork and not a screw off cap. The Redemption and Beard both had corks. 
    • came to $200, which if I would have known prior to digging in, I would have dropped the trailer off that night to save myself the time with a big smile; he said their shop puts a spiral groove into the pivot assembly so the grease is evenly distributed; just said to keep greasing it. they did check the other side and it was taking on grease and to just stay on top of it. Just mentioned its a poor design on those axles, not just a IC problem but the other brands have the same issues; just need to stay on top of the maintenance!!
    • I realize its still April but this bad stretch of baseball has been awful. Hopefully getting back into a routine schedule and a few games back home they can get back on track.   Thankfully Cleveland isn't completely running away with the division yet. Not sure at this point if Wildcard will even be an option for another team in this division this year.
    • Well cant say I am not surprised with the outcome from that series. I think it was good for players like KAT to get a taste of the playoffs and see first hand what it takes to compete in the playoffs etc. Hopefully it was a good learning experience.   I am more disappointed with Wiggins than anything. He was a ghost for most of the season and especially in this playoff series. That max deal looks worse and worse. 
    • Archery hunting turkeys is difficult at best, but when it all comes together It's as exciting as it gets. 
    • Figured you'd like that news bb, not sure I want to get rid of Granlund, he seems to be one of the few on the team to create offence and has always been decent in the playoffs, at least better than most of the others not named Parise. Zucker has some ugly playoff numbers too but we need his speed and 30 goals scorers just don't grow on trees, just hope he can find a way to step up when we need him. 

      We do appear set on D, our group did great on offense but still held their own in the D zone. Really like Seeler, I've probably said that too much but the way he played down the stretch and in the playoffs he could be an elite bottom pair guy, just need someone else to push Prosser to the press box.

      Foligno is a pretty decent 4th liner, just not at that stupid money we gave him, the 4th line was one of the bright spots in the playoffs. Hopefully Ek can break out a little bit next year, kid has all the tools to be the next Koivu but hopefully with more goal scoring. I'd give Nino another chance too, he was clearly off this year due to injuries and is just about always good for 25 goals when healthy. Agreed on Coyle, love his size and skill but he is just not the sum of his parts but watch us trade him and have him go on a tear.    Sounds like Leopold has his eyes on Fenton out of Nashville but lets hope they look everywhere. Should be an interesting off season.  One more note, just don't know about Dubs, we have had plenty of time to see what he is and right now he is half amazing and keeping us in games at times and sometimes letting in softies at bad times. Not going to hold game 5 against him, I don't even know what that was. Just not sure we will be able to find/trade someone better short term. It's like many of the others guys in a way, not the main reason we lost but not stepping up when needed the most. 
    •  Indeed I am pretty confident I will get one this weekend I am able to hunt fri to monday morning  
    • Yes the trout was biting also, we both brought home 5      
    • After hunting Archery only for the last 10 years their is nothing I would change. It is darn frustrating but that is what makes it so fun. 
    • Hope your trout fishing was as good as your turkey hunting. Beautiful morning, beautiful bird. Congrats.